sedetrad was the one who first brought it up, not me. If I didn't care about this forum, then I would not even say a word if some previously banned troublemaker came back on here. It's not taking over Matthew's responsibility. How do you think Matthew knows who people are on other accounts? The users on this forum let him know. When Hobson came back a month ago on another account, several people here pointed out how familiar his posting style looked and PMed Matthew about it. I've been here long enough to know how things work here.
It makes sense to PM Matthew if one has suspicions. But I do not see what good these public accusations do. People cannot prove they are who they say they are. They are left with a stain on their name, whether they deserve it or not.
Accusing a person of lying is very serious. It is not something to do based on a feeling or intuition.
PMing Matthew actually isn't something I want to do for two reasons. For one thing, he's extremely busy and has been especially busy lately and probably does not even have time to check his PMs. And I want to let others here know that Nonno is likely Father Cedaka. Something I notice is that those who accuse him of being Father C get thumbed-down while those who say he's not get thumbed-up. I believe they are from him and I believe he's Father C.
And like Raoul said, it's not a sin to accuse Nonno of lying if you have sufficient reasons to believe what you believe in. I've been on here long enough to know every trick that people such as Hobson and others who come back use. I know what I'm talking about, and have every right to be suspicious. There's no rule on this forum that says I can't be.