Author Topic: "Removing All Doubt" (Read 17003 times)

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #45 on:** June 28, 2011, 08:06:18 AM »

Quote from: Nonno

Just like Liberals, when they disagree with something solid, rather than attempt rebuttal or just plain admit they can't make the attempt, instead, resort to such things as personal attack.

Speaking of personal attacks, what are your thoughts on AC's shameless, disgusting attack on the character of the recently-deceased Abbot Leonard?

Why did you avoid my thoughts about the real reason people are laughing at AC's colossal stupidity?

Quote

So, I am supposed to succuмb to this diversion of personal interrogation and suspicion? If I am silent, am I guilty? If I deny it, I am a liar? Let me know if these are the only two choices. Really.

I don't care about it one way or another, but I can see why a diversion might help your situation...

Now, what are your thoughts about AC's revolting comments about Abbot Leonard? My personal take it that is will end having a similar effect as his Schiavo-gate insanity -- i.e., yet more people will see that his colossal arrogance and tactlessness are only surpassed by his utter lack of normal human feeling.

SJB · « **Reply #46 on:** June 28, 2011, 08:57:57 AM »

Quote from: Nonno

So, I am supposed to succuмb to this diversion of personal interrogation and suspicion? If I am silent, am I guilty? If I deny it, I am a liar? Let me know if these are the only two choices. Really.

The old quidlibet piece (since deleted, btw) comes to mind, Say Something, Say Nothing.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #47 on:** June 28, 2011, 09:37:40 AM »

Nonno, just admit you're Father C. It's so obvious, your posting style gave you away. Not to mention that you thumb-down my posts rather than directly address them, and you're sticking up for Father C (yourself) on this thread. I know you're him. Just admit it. Why the need to keep coming on CatholicInfo after being banned? As a priest, don't you have better things to do?

ColdFusion · « **Reply #48 on:** June 28, 2011, 10:13:55 AM »

Quote from: Nonno

Amazing stuff going on now. Just like Liberals, when they disagree with something solid, rather than attempt rebuttal or just plain admit they can't make the attempt, instead, resort to such things as personal attack. Somehow the identity of the author becomes an issue rather than admit what he says has a solid foundation. Is this allowable by the rules of this forum?

So, I am supposed to succuмb to this diversion of personal interrogation and suspicion? If I am silent, am I guilty? If I deny it, I am a liar? Let me know if these are the only two choices. Really.

Yeah, it's him.

Chi Roh · « **Reply #49 on:** June 28, 2011, 01:41:35 PM »

Quote from: Nonno

...rather than attempt rebuttal or just plain admit they can't make the attempt, instead, resort to such things as personal attack...

So talking of 'admitting' rather than 'attacking'; would you care to answer a relatively neutral Englishman if you are nothing more than Anthony Cekada? Given the speculation on here, I'd love to know...

With prayers from the English Sede Mission :pop:

Craig (yep, my REAL name :cool: )