Author Topic: "Removing All Doubt" (Read 15489 times)

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #45 on:** June 28, 2011, 08:06:18 AM »

Quote from: Nonno

Just like Liberals, when they disagree with something solid, rather than attempt rebuttal or just plain admit they can't make the attempt, instead, resort to such things as personal attack.

Speaking of personal attacks, what are your thoughts on AC's shameless, disgusting attack on the character of the recently-deceased Abbot Leonard?

Why did you avoid my thoughts about the real reason people are laughing at AC's colossal stupidity?

Quote

So, I am supposed to succuмb to this diversion of personal interrogation and suspicion? If I am silent, am I guilty? If I deny it, I am a liar? Let me know if these are the only two choices. Really.

I don't care about it one way or another, but I can see why a diversion might help your situation...

Now, what are your thoughts about AC's revolting comments about Abbot Leonard? My personal take it that is will end having a similar effect as his Schiavo-gate insanity -- i.e., yet more people will see that his colossal arrogance and tactlessness are only surpassed by his utter lack of normal human feeling.

SJB · « **Reply #46 on:** June 28, 2011, 08:57:57 AM »

Quote from: Nonno

So, I am supposed to succuмb to this diversion of personal interrogation and suspicion? If I am silent, am I guilty? If I deny it, I am a liar? Let me know if these are the only two choices. Really.

The old quidlibet piece (since deleted, btw) comes to mind, Say Something, Say Nothing.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #47 on:** June 28, 2011, 09:37:40 AM »

Nonno, just admit you're Father C. It's so obvious, your posting style gave you away. Not to mention that you thumb-down my posts rather than directly address them, and you're sticking up for Father C (yourself) on this thread. I know you're him. Just admit it. Why the need to keep coming on CatholicInfo after being banned? As a priest, don't you have better things to do?

ColdFusion · « **Reply #48 on:** June 28, 2011, 10:13:55 AM »

Quote from: Nonno

Amazing stuff going on now. Just like Liberals, when they disagree with something solid, rather than attempt rebuttal or just plain admit they can't make the attempt, instead, resort to such things as personal attack. Somehow the identity of the author becomes an issue rather than admit what he says has a solid foundation. Is this allowable by the rules of this forum?

So, I am supposed to succuмb to this diversion of personal interrogation and suspicion? If I am silent, am I guilty? If I deny it, I am a liar? Let me know if these are the only two choices. Really.

Yeah, it's him.

Chi Roh · « **Reply #49 on:** June 28, 2011, 01:41:35 PM »

Quote from: Nonno

...rather than attempt rebuttal or just plain admit they can't make the attempt, instead, resort to such things as personal attack...

So talking of 'admitting' rather than 'attacking'; would you care to answer a relatively neutral Englishman if you are nothing more than Anthony Cekada? Given the speculation on here, I'd love to know...

With prayers from the English Sede Mission :pop:

Craig (yep, my REAL name :cool: )

Nonno · « **Reply #50 on:** June 28, 2011, 02:42:57 PM »

Quote from: Chi Roh

would you care to answer a relatively neutral Englishman if you are nothing more than Anthony Cekada? Given the speculation on here, I'd love to know...

Craig, I am not Anthony Cekada.

gladius, I have never read anything AC has authored concerning Abbot Leonard.

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #51 on:** June 28, 2011, 02:57:40 PM »

Quote from: Nonno

gladius, I have never read anything AC has authored concerning Abbot Leonard.

http://www.traditionalmass.org/blog/2011/05/30/tragedy-and-treason-at-christ-the-king-abbey/

Jaynek · « **Reply #52 on:** June 28, 2011, 03:03:46 PM »

Quote from: Nonno

Amazing stuff going on now. Just like Liberals, when they disagree with something solid, rather than attempt rebuttal or just plain admit they can't make the attempt, instead, resort to such things as personal attack. Somehow the identity of the author becomes an issue rather than admit what he says has a solid foundation. Is this allowable by the rules of this forum?

So, I am supposed to succuмb to this diversion of personal interrogation and suspicion? If I am silent, am I guilty? If I deny it, I am a liar? Let me know if these are the only two choices. Really.

I'm pretty new here and don't know why Fr. Cekeda is supposed to be so awful. I don't care either. Personally, I prefer to take your posts at face value and not worry about your identity.

I saw the post where you deny being he. I believe you.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #53 on:** June 28, 2011, 03:18:03 PM »

Quote from: ColdFusion

Quote from: Nonno
Amazing stuff going on now. Just like Liberals, when they disagree with something solid, rather than attempt rebuttal or just plain admit they can't make the attempt, instead, resort to such things as personal attack. Somehow the identity of the author becomes an issue rather than admit what he says has a solid foundation. Is this allowable by the rules of this forum?

So, I am supposed to succuмb to this diversion of personal interrogation and suspicion? If I am silent, am I guilty? If I deny it, I am a liar? Let me know if these are the only two choices. Really.

Yeah, it's him.

Cold Fusion, what is the secret to your "knowing"?

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #54 on:** June 28, 2011, 03:19:18 PM »

Quote from: Jaynek

I'm pretty new here and don't know why Fr. Cekeda is supposed to be so awful.

Father Cedaka is a sede priest who, from what I have read about him, appears to be a bit...nutty. I've heard people say he's trying to ruin their reputation. That's not how a priest should act.

The reason it matters if it's him is because he was already banned from here, and you're not allowed to have multiple accounts on CatholicInfo. Once you're banned, that's it unless Matthew lifts your ban.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #55 on:** June 28, 2011, 03:20:27 PM »

Quote from: Nonno

Craig, I am not Anthony Cekada.

Right. And I'm Cardinal Mahoney.

Jaynek · « **Reply #56 on:** June 28, 2011, 03:32:42 PM »

Quote from: SpiritusSanctus

The reason it matters if it's him is because he was already banned from here, and you're not allowed to have multiple accounts on CatholicInfo. Once you're banned, that's it unless Matthew lifts your ban.

Of course people should respect the rules of the forum. Has Matthew indicated that he wants posses of vigilantes to go around accusing people for him?

I accept that Nonno is telling the truth.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #57 on:** June 28, 2011, 03:34:09 PM »

David Hobson denied who he was when he came back on multiple accounts. Just because Nonno says he's not Father Cedaka doesn't mean he's telling the truth. The way he posts and acts here tells me he is.

Chi Roh · « **Reply #58 on:** June 28, 2011, 03:37:58 PM »

Quote from: Nonno

...Craig, I am not Anthony Cekada.

Thanks for that :smile:

Given the interest in "miracles" generated on this thread though, I did perceive that it would be a very near one if AC actually confessed to using a pseudonym :wink:

Nevertheless, given this thread is about AC's huge 'omelette on face' with his fantastically farcical pre-emptive email boasting of Fr. Ramolla's imminent deportation, IMHO let's not get bogged down with inane diversions about the semantics of a 'miracle'.

Personally, it's not far from a miracle that Cekada, whom I believe attempted to immitate one of my own countrymen in the user-name 'Baz' (

) has not dramatically nose-dived after such a guffaw. Surely such a 'scholar' would never allow such presumption to pass his lips let alone into a openly public email to those in the priesthood?

Ahh well, SGG descends deeper into the quagmire...

God bless,

Craig

Jaynek · « **Reply #59 on:** June 28, 2011, 03:39:13 PM »

Quote from: SpiritusSanctus

David Hobson denied who he was when he came back on multiple accounts. Just because Nonno says he's not Father Cedaka doesn't mean he's telling the truth. The way he posts and acts here tells me he is.

Have you been given the responsibility of sniffing out imposters? If you have not, then I cannot understand why you are bothering Nonno.