http://www.christorchaos.com/InDeathAsInLifeTheAntithesisOfChristTheKing.htmHeroic Virtues of Giovanni Montini/Paul VI?
"Heroic virtues?"
Betraying priests behind the Iron Curtain to agents of Josef Stalin (see We Must Accept What Rationalists Reject)?
Adopting the methods of Saul Alinsky after meeting him courtesy of Jacques Maritain (see Alinsky's Sheen)?
Signing the docuмents of the "Second" Vatican Council that have resulted in the loss of so many souls to the Catholic Faith and helped to give a textual foundation for the conciliar revolution?
Telling the delegates at the United Masonic Nations Organization on October 4, 1965, that "The peoples of the earth turn to the United Nations as the last hope of concord and peace" (Giovanni Montini/Paul VI's Address to the United Nations, October 4, 1965?
Constantly extolling the "Cult of Man"?
Returning to Turkey the flag of the Turkish flagship that was captured in the Battle of Lepanto?
Promulgating false rites of episcopal consecration, priestly ordination, the administration of the Sacrament of Confirmation and abolishing the Sacrament of Extreme Unction?
Promulgating the Protestant and Masonic Novus Ordo service on April 3, 1969?
Issuing the socialist manifesto Populorum Progressio, March 25, 1967 (see Making a Mockery of Catholicism).
Genuflecting before Greek Orthodox patriarch Athenagoras I on December 7, 1965, in Constantinople, Turkey?
Permitting First Communion to be given two years prior to the reception of First Penance on an "experimental" basis?
Restoring the permanent diaconate?
Betraying Josef Cardinal Midzsenty (see We Must Accept What Rationalists Reject) while engaging in his wretched policy of Ostpolitik?
Redefining the ends of marriage and promoting a "natural" means to limit the size of families in Humanae Vitae, July 25, 1968 (see Forty-Three Years After Humanae Vitae)?
Creating one revolutionary bishop (true ones between 1965 and 1968 and false ones in the Roman Rite between 1968 and 1978) after another, including the likes of Joseph Bernardin, Terence Cooke, Bernard Law, Humberto Medeiros, Francis Mugavero, John Raymond McGann, Thomas Gumbleton, Rembert Weakland, Howard Hubbard, John May, Raymond Hunthausen, John Roach, John Quinn and a chap by the name of Joseph Ratzinger, to name just handful as it is 2:00 a.m. on the morning of Tuesday, October 16, 2012, the Feast of Saint Hedwig, after all.
Opening the way to the conciliar annulment factory?
Presiding over what he himself called "the auto-destruction of the Church" as thousands of priests and religious sisters quit their religious vow and the pews of formerly Catholic churches emptied?
Engaging in egregious acts of sacrilege and blasphemy in "inter-religious" events?
Promoting "liberation theology" in the name of a "preferential option for the poor" at the Conference of Latin American Episcopates in Medellin, Colombia, on August 246, 1968?
Living a life of sin that had been used against him by the Soviets and was later used as a wedge for the Freemasons to get him to approve of cremation?
A life of sin? Yes, for those who don't know, please consider the following:
[Atila[ Guimarães quotes Franco Bellegrandi, a former member of the Vatican Noble Guard, part of the papal military corps, who witnessed the unfortunate changes that occurred at the Vatican after Pope Paul VI took office.
Bellegrandi repeats the charge that while Archbishop of Milan, Montini, dressed in civilian clothes, was picked up by the local police on one of the archbishop's nocturnal visits to the male brothels of the city.
The former Vatican guard describes the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ colonization process that he says began under Pope John XXIII, but which accelerated under Montini's rule--a process with [which] the reader should by now be thoroughly familiar. Bellegrandi says that old employees were turned out of their jobs at the Vatican to make room for Montini's favored brethren afflicted with the same vice. They in turn brought along their favorite catamites--"effeminate young men wearing elegant uniforms and make-up on their faces to dissimulate their beards," says Bellegrandi.
Bellegrandi says that he was told by an official of the Vatican security service that Montini's actor friend was permitted free access to the pontifical apartments and was seen taking the elevator late at night.
One of the statements made by Bellegrandi that attracted my attention was that Montini no sooner took office than he was subject to blackmail by Italian Freemasons. In exchange for their silence regarding Archbishop Montini's furtive sojourns to Switzerland to rendezvous with his actor-lover, who appears to have been quite open about his relationship with the prelate, the Masons demanded that the pope eliminate the Church's traditional ban on cremation after death. The pope complied. (Mrs. Randy Engel, The Rite of Sodomy, p. 1156)
An elderly gentleman from Paris who worked as an official interpreter for high-level clerics at the Vatican in the early 1950s told this writer that the Soviets blackmailed Montini into revealing the names of priests whom the Vatican had clandestinely sent behind the Iron Curtain to minister to Catholics in the Soviet Union during the Cold War. The Soviet secret police were on hand as soon as the priests crossed over the Russian border and the priest infiltrators were either shot or sent to the gulag.
The extent to which Pope Paul VI was subject to blackmail by the enemies of the Church will probably never be known. It may be that, in so far as the Communists and the Socialists were concerned, blackmail was entirely unnecessary given Montini's cradle to grave fascination and affinity for the Left. On the other hand, the Italian Freemasons, M16, the OSS and later the CIA and the Mafia were likely to have used blackmail and extortion against Montini beginning early in his career as a junior diplomat, then as Archbishop of Milan and finally as Pope Paul VI.
There can be no question that Pope Paul VI's ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity was instrumental in the paradigm shift that saw the rise of the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ Collective in the Catholic Church in the United States, at the Vatican and around the world in the mid-20th century.
Pope Paul VI played a decisive role in the selection and advancement of many ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ members of the American hierarchy, including Joseph Cardinal Bernardin, Terence Cardinal Cooke, John Cardinal Wright and Archbishop Rembert Weakland and Bishops George H. Guilfoyle, Francis Mugavero, Joseph Hart, Joseph Ferrario, James Rausch and their heirs.
The knowledge that a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ sat in the Chair of Peter--knowledge that spread like wild-fire on the "gαy" gossip circuit--would certainly have served as an inducement for ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ men to aspire to the priesthood and even prompt them to contemplate the unthinkable--a religious order or community composed exclusively of sodomites.
Most important, the long-guarded quasi-secret of Paul VI's ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ life has, for decades, contributed to the silence and cover-up by the American hierarchy on the issue of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity in general and the criminal activities of pederast priests in particular.
But it is a secret no longer.
The final piece of the puzzle has been put in place.
"Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us." Mrs. Randy Engel, The Rite of Sodomy, pp. 1156-1157)
Yes, sounds like a perfect candidate for "beatification" in the counterfeit church of conciliarism if the assembled non-cardinals give their approval to the "miracle" that took sixteen years to manifest itself and is based upon the diagnosis of a condition in an unborn child by doctors ever eager to convince women to kill their babies by claiming the existence of "problems" that simply do not exist. What could be better? A phony "pope" who lived a life of moral degradation with a phony "miracle" to speed him along the path fo a "beatification" even though his embalmed body turned black before it had been shown to the public and was said to reek of a horrible smell (something that was blamed on the heat of the Mediterranean sun beating down on the poor man's mortal remains)?
Sure, "Blessed" Paul the Sick will fit right in with Jose Maria Escriva Balaguer y Albas and Mother Teresa, a syncretist, and Antonio Rosmini, forty of whose propositions were condemned by Pope Leo XIII in 1887 only to be "rehabilitated" in 2001 by Joseph "Cardinal" Ratzinger (see Beatifying Their Own), and most notoriously, Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II (see "Beatifying" Yet Another Conciliar Revolutionary, "Canonizing" A Man Who Protected Moral Derelicts, Unimaginable Deceit and Duplicity, Not The Work of God, To Be Loved by the Jєωs, Perhaps Judas Was the First to Sing "A Kiss is Just a Kiss", Enjoy the Party, George, Enjoy the Party, and Anticlimactic "Beatification" for an Antipope).
What's next? Well, after Albino Luciani/John Paul I gets himself approved for "beatification," the only thing to do after this is to await the death of Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI so that his own "cause" for "canonization" could be introduced by his own successor. That way, you see, each of the five conciliar "popes" would carry with them a "seal of sanctity" with which conciliar apologists could bludgeon critics by saying irrationally, "These men were saints, not heretics and blasphemers as you keep insisting." That's why this is being done. Make no mistake about this whatsoever.
Mind you, I have just provided a summary of some of the more salient low lights that qualify Giovanni Montini to be "beatified" as "Blessed" Paul the Sick. For a more extensive analysis, including some of the correspondence that the late Abbe de Nantes, Georges de Nantes, who denounced the "Second" Vatican Council as soon as it was over in 1965 (see The Abbé de Nantes: Fidei Defensor), had with Montini/Paul VI, please see Paul VI Beatified?, by Father Luigi Villa.
Giovanni Montini/Paul VI was no kind of "virtuous" man, no less a Catholic. Montini/Paul VI, apart from living his life of sin and being a lifelong admirers of socialism, was a bitter and vindictive man who did not like to have his conscience singed by anyone. He reacted violently to criticism from the Abbe de Nantes and Bishop Antonio Castro de Mayer, nearly slapping Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in the face when they had the following exchange in the Apostolic Palace on September 11, 1976:
Montini: "Why do yo not accept the Council? You signed the decrees."
Lefebvre: "There were two that I did not sign."
Montini: "Yes, two, religious liberty and Gaudium et Spes."
(Archbishop Lefebvre's mental note: "I thought at the time: 'I signed the others out of respect for the Holy Father. He [Montini] went on.")
Montini: "And why not religious liberty?"
Lefebvre: "It contains passages that are word for word contrary to what was taught by Gregory XVI and Pius IX."
Montini: "Let's leave that aside! We are not here to discuss theology."
(Archbishop Lefebvre's mental note: "I thought to myself: 'This is unbelievable.'") (Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, The Biography of Marcel Lefebvre, Kansas City, Missouri, Angelus Press, pp. 491-492.)
Topic: "Pope" Paul 6 (Read 1300 times)