Author Topic: "Maurice Pinay" Supported Interreligious Dialogue? (Read 16116 times)

Caminus · « **on:** February 14, 2011, 07:46:37 PM »

As I was reading the great tract titled "The Plot Against the Church" that circulated amongst the Council Fathers written under the pseudonym "Maurice Pinay" I came accross this strange opinion:

Quote

For only through the uniting of the peoples and the alliance of all religions can a coalition come into existence which is strong enough to save us and mankind from the Jєωιѕн-Communist slavery threatening us all to the same measure.

This great alliance can only be concluded, if a real feeling of brotherhood exists among the peoples and a respect of the natural right of each individual.

It would be fateful and catastrophic if the movements for freedom against Jєωιѕн Imperialism and its Communist revolution, which arise in different nations of the world, became Imperialist nationalisms. For then the defence of the peoples would be impossible, which at these moments is so necessary, in order to triumph over Jєωιѕн Imperialism. We would once again fail with this perhaps last opportunity, in order to save ourselves, for the Jews and their Freemasonic and Communist satellites would skilfully utilise every Imperialist tendency of an anti-Jєωιѕн liberation movement, in order to set the threatened peoples against it, just as was the case in the last world war.

This is a decisive moment in history, and we have only a few years to liberate ourselves from Jєωιѕн-Communist slavery. The liberation movements which in several countries fight against Jєωιѕн Imperialism, should understand that today such conduct is suicidal and should therefore zealously fight, not only to liberate their peoples from the Jews, but to also unite in a brotherly way with similar liberation movements, so that the whole of mankind can be freed, including naturally the unfortunate peoples, who are already subjected by Red totalitarianism. The Imperialist Jews would be defeated by a closely allied world. But their victory over a mankind split up on the political realm in national, racial or religious rivalries is certain.

National and racial rivalries should be laid aside by wav of peaceful negotiations. Differences of opinion in the religious domain should be decided in an honourable, peaceful, theological discussion, which in the long run gives the right to those who deserve it, but prevents that these antagonisms degenerate into religious wars or violent conflicts, which always make impossible a political uniting of the peoples, which is so neces-sary, in the first place to eliminate the threat by Jєωιѕн Imperialism and later to secure world peace, which is indis-pensable for the progress and maintenance of the human race.

:confused1:

Telesphorus · « **Reply #1 on:** February 14, 2011, 08:03:42 PM »

Certainly there is nothing wrong with political alliance with other Christian sects and with Muslims against Zionist Imperialism.

Quote

Differences of opinion in the religious domain should be decided in an honourable, peaceful, theological discussion, which in the long run gives the right to those who deserve it, but prevents that these antagonisms degenerate into religious wars or violent conflicts, which always make impossible a political uniting of the peoples, which is so neces-sary, in the first place to eliminate the threat by Jєωιѕн Imperialism and later to secure world peace, which is indis-pensable for the progress and maintenance of the human race.

This goes too far.

Caminus · « **Reply #2 on:** February 14, 2011, 08:17:28 PM »

Right, I was with him or "them" regarding political measures, but then it switched to the religious realm. Not good.

Raoul76 · « **Reply #3 on:** February 14, 2011, 08:18:06 PM »

I remember being horrified by lots of sections of this book, but that was a while ago when I was more paranoid. I'd have to read it with fresh eyes, not just skim it like before, to see if "Maurice Pinay" is advocating a merely expedient, political detente with the Prots and other Christian sects, or if there is something more to it.

Raoul76 · « **Reply #4 on:** February 14, 2011, 08:21:37 PM »

Yeah, my vague memory is that this book was very Vatican II-sounding and was suggesting some kind of religious union with Protestants. Don't hold me to that though.

Interestingly, Michael Hoffman, who is also fixated on the Jєωιѕн question, is all for religious liberty. Maybe hatred for the Jews, rather than simple realism about their anti-Christ activities in the world, blinds you. Or maybe there are infiltrators who portray themselves as anti-Jew to win the confidence of certain Catholics, at which point they then slip them some misleading opinions.