Author Topic: "Maurice Pinay" Supported Interreligious Dialogue? (Read 16922 times)

Caminus · « **Reply #10 on:** February 15, 2011, 03:58:14 PM »

Quote

Then again, when Chesterton can go around praising the most Satanic event in world history, the French Revolution, and still be treated like an uncanonized saint, it's no wonder this flies with certain people.

I find this very difficult to believe, given Chesteron's brilliant ability to see and explain true historical causes and effects of events and movements. Would you provide proof for this assertion? I'm fairly certain you either missed his point or some distinction which great minds are apt to make.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #11 on:** February 15, 2011, 04:41:05 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

I believe that Belloc approved of reforms that were enacted through Aug 4 1789.

I don't really get the point of your post here. Care to elaborate?

roscoe · « **Reply #12 on:** February 15, 2011, 05:40:55 PM »

Fr Rev proceeded by steps. My understanding is that Belloc approved of the reforms( as he has interpreted them) enacted until that date. IOW-- a Constitutional Monarchy with the kings authority limited.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #13 on:** February 16, 2011, 01:52:46 PM »

We would have to let Belloc clarify his stance on that. Although, I have not seen him on here in several weeks.

roscoe · « **Reply #14 on:** February 16, 2011, 02:15:02 PM »

Quote from: SpiritusSanctus

We would have to let Belloc clarify his stance on that. Although, I have not seen him on here in several weeks.

I am referring to the author-- not the poster. Mo re: the poster is Good Riddance.