Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: "He who hears you, hears Me..."  (Read 20373 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
"He who hears you, hears Me..."
« Reply #40 on: July 24, 2008, 08:10:37 PM »
Quote from: roscoe
Even in the days of a Boniface, a Wolsey or a Spellman, at least you were correct in doing as they said.


EXACTLY!  Such can no longer be said, granting that the V2 Pontiffs and/or their phony religion are to be taken seriously.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
"He who hears you, hears Me..."
« Reply #41 on: July 24, 2008, 08:26:35 PM »
I didn't delete any threads. Sometimes I move a thread to the "Crisis" sub-form where appropriate.

Only my wife and I have access to delete threads.

You can call me whatever you want. As a busy family man, I have more important PRACTICAL things to worry about in my life.

I used to spend more time arguing such issues, but now I see that it's hard enough to become a saint without taking on the Church's problems as well. Perhaps single people have the time for it -- I just know that I don't.

Sincerely,

Matthew


"He who hears you, hears Me..."
« Reply #42 on: July 24, 2008, 08:53:26 PM »
The only position that is defensible is that of a 'sede'. When asked, even Cletus can't come up with a good argument against the 'sedes'. It should hardly be surprising that no one else has a thing to say. However I would like to thank Matthew for at least letting us have our views heard.  :argue:

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
"He who hears you, hears Me..."
« Reply #43 on: July 24, 2008, 09:49:16 PM »
Quote from: ChantCd
I used to spend more time arguing such issues, but now I see that it's hard enough to become a saint without taking on the Church's problems as well. Perhaps single people have the time for it -- I just know that I don't.


Thank you for your magnanimity and patience with a poor idiot. :wave:  Please see the other thread I started, which I somehow did not see anywhere before, wherein I publicly apologize to you.

As for the above, I certainly understand.  However, the central point is that one cannot work out one's salvation very well when one cannot even establish, or reasonably explain to themselves or others, the identity of Holy Church.  It is IMPOSSIBLE to do as Benedict does, or even do as he says, making it IMPOSSIBLE for him to be Christ's vicar.  This demonstrable fact, accepted implicitly by all who resist the V2 Pontiffs and their bogus religion, cannot be swept aside nonchalantly - duties or no duties.  God speed.

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
"He who hears you, hears Me..."
« Reply #44 on: July 24, 2008, 09:51:01 PM »
Quote from: roscoe
The only position that is defensible is that of a 'sede'.


There are those who would argue this, even amongst those who reject Benedict et alii.  Sede privationists AND sede impeditists would say that pure sede vacantism is worthless, as it leaves you without a visible Church.