Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: I demand an answer  (Read 20007 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

I demand an answer
« Reply #130 on: February 11, 2011, 01:54:05 PM »
Ack, sorry Raoul!!  My use of the word lazy was in itself lazy.  It's my break time, and my kids are doing lessons, so I couldn't even make one of them go grab me the Thesaurus.

I mean something like "too easy", considering Abp. Lefebvre died so long ago.  If we are only talking current affairs, there is a lot going on with "krahgate" and so forth.

I'm the lazy one, here, no personal denigration of you was intended at all.

I demand an answer
« Reply #131 on: February 11, 2011, 03:04:41 PM »
LOL @ this thread.

I'm a sede. Simple.


Offline SJB

I demand an answer
« Reply #132 on: February 11, 2011, 04:22:31 PM »
Quote from: PartyIsOver221
LOL @ this thread.

I'm a sede. Simple.


Yes, simple.  :pop:

I demand an answer
« Reply #133 on: February 11, 2011, 05:22:26 PM »
Quote from: SJB
Quote from: PartyIsOver221
LOL @ this thread.

I'm a sede. Simple.


Yes, simple.  :pop:


Ok, maybe I was a bit too smug in that last post. Forgive me.

Regardless, God will be the ultimate Judge at the end of time, and I hope we both make it to heaven, SJB. With the knowledge I've learned, signs God has shown me time and time again, and insight prayer has brought me(which maybe God has chosen to shelter from you and not let permeate your brain), I have no other option but to follow the Truth. My conscience feels at ease , without the hypocrisy that other options have given me.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
I demand an answer
« Reply #134 on: February 11, 2011, 05:31:57 PM »
Quote from: SJB
Quote from: Raoul76
The reality is that the entire SSPX position is faulty.  These internecine battles in the SSPX are a mere distraction.  It's all perfectly arranged to buy more time for the Vatican II anti-Popes to do their dirty work.  They haven't been in "power" for fifty years by accident, okay?


The entire SSPX position can't be faulty because all traditionalists held this position at one time. Do you mean their position on the Pope is faulty? Or their position on some theological principles is faulty?


That's the problem I have with those who have a problem with the SSPX.

(Go ahead and re-read the previous sentence. I'll wait.)

You make a very good point. What exactly IS the SSPX position?

It's keeping Catholic Tradition (the Faith), and acknowledging a Pope at the same time -- which is precisely what Catholics practiced for centuries.

So SSPX Catholics didn't change -- the world around them did.

You can't call someone guilty who was formerly innocent, who never changed his behavior...

"If I am wrong now, we were wrong then..." and all that.

Matthew