Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: "Bishop" Neal Webster  (Read 13344 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


"Bishop" Neal Webster
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2010, 02:09:44 PM »
It is things like this that make me want to go back to and stay in the Church regardless of what is or isn't going on there.

Posting things like this does more harm than good for the "cause" and only makes a mockery out of the sedevacantists.   It is enough to make anyone even considering it to turn away in disgust.

Whether it is true or not, I care not at this point.  Too many independent bishops with dubious orders in the sedevacantist circles are popping up all over the place.  It is really starting to look more protestant than Catholic.

This is what happens when you are your own authority.


"Bishop" Neal Webster
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2010, 02:34:48 PM »
The link does not work for me.  :confused1:

Pls explain how it would make one want to return to NO church. I have tried numerous times to convince the 'sedes' in this forum that there is No Such Thing as 'sede vacantism'.

"Bishop" Neal Webster
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2010, 02:47:29 PM »
Quote from: roscoe
The link does not work for me.  :confused1:

Pls explain how it would make one want to return to NO church. I have tried numerous times to convince the 'sedes' in this forum that there is No Such Thing as 'sede vacantism'.


Because, Roscoe, it is absolute insanity.  Men going around getting themselves "ordained" by "bishops" who themselves are questionable.  Then, once they get themselves "ordained", they find a "bishop" who they can convince to "consecrate" them too.

They all claim to be the "only true bishop" and demand the allegiance of all "true Catholics".  

If that doesn't work, they then proceed to rake through the coals the reputation of anyone whom they perceive to be a threat to their territory and to their flock.  In other words, less money for them if more bogus bishops are on the horizon.

It is insanity; they are not the "true Church of Christ" no matter how bad the present crisis is.  

Once again, this is what happens when you become your own authority and submit your judgment to no one but yourself.

P.S.  The link worked for me.

"Bishop" Neal Webster
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2010, 02:53:26 PM »
Quote from: Alexandria
Quote from: roscoe
The link does not work for me.  :confused1:

Pls explain how it would make one want to return to NO church. I have tried numerous times to convince the 'sedes' in this forum that there is No Such Thing as 'sede vacantism'.


Because, Roscoe, it is absolute insanity.  Men going around getting themselves "ordained" by "bishops" who themselves are questionable.  Then, once they get themselves "ordained", they find a "bishop" who they can convince to "consecrate" them too.

They all claim to be the "only true bishop" and demand the allegiance of all "true Catholics".  

If that doesn't work, they then proceed to rake through the coals the reputation of anyone whom they perceive to be a threat to their territory and to their flock.  In other words, less money for them if more bogus bishops are on the horizon.

It is insanity; they are not the "true Church of Christ" no matter how bad the present crisis is.  

Once again, this is what happens when you become your own authority and submit your judgment to no one but yourself.

P.S.  The link worked for me.


I have to agree with Roscoe on this one. Why under any circuмstances would one WANT to go to the NO Church? There is no logical reason behind that.