Why the Traditional Latin Mass ? Why Not the New?

Here are some insights:

The Traditional Mass is already 2000 years of Venerable usage, tried and true.

The New Mass fabricated in 1969, Experimental

The Traditional Mass, clearly a sacrifice.

The New Mass, clearly meal table.

The Traditional Mass is centered on God, structured for reverence.

The New Mass centered on man, loose structure invites abuses.

The Traditional Mass, Completely Catholic, One , Holy, Catholic, Apostolic

The New Mass, half protestant, lacks all Four Marks.

The Traditional Mass, codified at Council of Trent by a Pope Saint
( Saint Pius V )

The New Mass, contrived for approval of Six Protestant Ministers

The Traditional Mass, Fruitful! Multitudes of saints, martyrs, religious vocations

The New Mass, Barren! Empty seminaries, decreased mass attendance, massive defections.

The Traditional Mass, '... By this our decree, to be valid IN PERPETUITY, we determine and order that NEVER shall anything be added to, omitted from, or changed in this Missal..." Pope Saint Pius V QUO PRIMUM JULY 19, 1570

The New Mass, " With the New Liturgy, non-Catholic communities will be able to celebrate the Lord's Supper with the same prayers of the Catholic Church." Max Thurian Protestant Minister of Taize

"... nothing in the renewed Mass need really trouble the Evangelical Protestant.." M.G. Siegvalt, Protestant Professor of Dogmatic Theology, Strasbourg.

The Traditional Mass! Never abrogated by Holy Mother Church!

The New Mass, an Experiment that Failed.

Wow.  It sounds as if you're saying the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite of the Catholic Church is an incentive to impiety rather than services of piety.  (Cf. Denz 954)

How can that be?