I do not believe that among my Brothers in the Episcopate there is anyone who has the courage to clearly state that the Second Vatican Council was a subversive act carried out by emissaries of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ who infiltrated the Church, with the aim of destroying Her from within and enslaving Her to the plans of the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr. Nor do I believe that those who are aware of Bergoglio’s fraud want to compromise their position by calling into question the legitimacy of his claim to be the pope.
1000% this, and that is why there will be no "solution" from the Conciliar Nonclaves. I do find it interesting that he did have one or two bishops express some "sympath" ... I wonder who those might be, but not a single "Cardinal".