Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: subverting encryption  (Read 1558 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.


Offline Yeti

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Reputation: +2421/-528
  • Gender: Male
Re: subverting encryption
« Reply #1 on: August 08, 2025, 05:39:52 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • They can make it much more cuмbersome to send encrypted data, but they can't make it impossible. If people encrypt the information on their own computer using GPG, for example, which is freely available, and exchange public keys, and send encrypted information back and forth which they then decrypt on their local computer, I don't think the government can access that. Not without the private key, which remains on the hard drive of the sender, and can't be used anyway without a password unlock on it as well, which can be committed to memory.


    Offline Yeti

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4111
    • Reputation: +2421/-528
    • Gender: Male
    Re: subverting encryption
    « Reply #2 on: August 08, 2025, 05:41:37 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't think dual-key PGP encryption has been breached; at least, there is no publicly-available evidence that it has ever been cracked by anyone, that I am aware of.

    Offline Geremia

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4869
    • Reputation: +1589/-362
    • Gender: Male
      • St. Isidore e-book library
    Re: subverting encryption
    « Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 08:51:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ridiculous 🇪🇺 trying to illegalize encryption
    St. Isidore e-book library: https://isidore.co

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12666
    • Reputation: +8402/-1597
    • Gender: Male
    Re: subverting encryption
    « Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 09:07:08 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't think dual-key PGP encryption has been breached; at least, there is no publicly-available evidence that it has ever been cracked by anyone, that I am aware of.
    I guess "publicly available" is the rub here.

    In the days before my reversion to the Faith I hung around with the Cypherpunks (Zimmerman et al.) in the SF Bay Area, even dated one of the most brilliant of them (until the insidious ravages of end-stage Lyme Disease).

    To my and their moral certainty, PGP was broken at will by brute force attacks since the early 90's. The 2025 computer power, especially quantum computing avalaible to .gov/.ZOG, now trivializes breaking PGP.

    After my return to the Faith I still bump into old (and new) friends who confirm that PGP is as effective as placing a letter in an envelope.

    My experiences certainly are not "publicly available," but nobody should be so foolish as to place absolute faith in any form of encryption. Do I use encryption? Emphatically, yes!!! I heartily encourage the use of encryption when available, but I have no illusions. If you are a target, your encryption, even multi-nested non-NIST algorithms, will be broken.