CathInfo.com

If they won't mention the 6 Gorzillion lb little-hat gorilla in the room, then any such source is, as you say, "kids gloves."

Are you referring to some statistic with a very large multiple of 6, that has been, shall we say, a matter of some dispute in sources that challenge the conventional wisdom?  Inquiry more appropriate to a man called Jake Ewing?  (Say that out loud a couple of times, and it'll make sense.)

Qui legit, intelligat.

We have free antenna television.

Politicians come and go but God is forever!

That is my preference, that and free Roku programming, but circuмstances dictate that I have some sort of television connection beyond that, coming into the house.  I like saving money.  But my preferences are not the only preferences that must be considered.   

Not that any of us have "gone there" yet in this thread, but just to clarify, I do not wish to rehash the old SSPX debate about not even having a television in the house, nor anything about television being X number of steps removed from reality.  I actually agree with much of this reasoning, but television, online video, social media video, and so on, have "morphed" together, in that it is rapidly becoming, if it hasn't already, a single phenomenon, i.e., a multi-platform means of delivering two-dimensional video to mass audiences.  Using that reasoning, there could be no cinema, no movies, because they, too, are "X number of steps removed from reality".  So are photographs.  So are books.