Author Topic: Poche is banned (Read 16088 times)

Incredulous · « **Reply #150 on:** October 16, 2020, 03:17:08 PM »

I have started to like Meg.
In the past we used to fight, but I think she’s matured in the last 18 months.

I’ve thought of her positions as an +ABL ultra-loyalist, and maybe a sede-phobe. But that’s okay.

Her indifference to Poche I viewed as a female sympathy thing...

Like when you come in the house to tell the wife you’re gonna shoot the dog cause he killed all the chickens.

Her first response is to feel sorry for the dog and ask you to spare the “poor Puppy’s” life.

But I’m glad Matthew shot Poche.
His theology was malignant and he had to go.

Matto · « **Reply #151 on:** October 16, 2020, 03:21:37 PM »

Quote from: 2Vermont on October 16, 2020, 03:10:12 PM

It seems to me that Matto has become more anti-sede in recent months, so the posts were totally believable.

I became "anti-sede" after I tried to listen to the first Novus Ordo Watch "TRADCAST" and right at the beginning the host declared that only sedes were traditional Catholics. That was the moment. But I am not really anti-sede. My two best friends are sedes and I respect them and consider them Catholics and don't argue with them. But I disagree with the position and think it is mistaken and think some of the more extreme ones are schismatic. Sometimes when thinking about the sad state of the Church I make fun of sedes, but they are not the only people I make fun of.

claudel · « **Reply #152 on:** October 16, 2020, 03:35:05 PM »

Quote from: Ladislaus on October 16, 2020, 08:39:26 AM

I did ask poche several times to let us know where he's coming from and why he posts on the forum given that he disagrees with every other member here. He refused to answer.

He did not refuse to answer. Rather, he simply didn't answer. As an exercise in self-control, Ladislaus, try writing fifty tendentiousness-free words every day.

Quote from: Ladislaus on October 16, 2020, 08:39:26 AM

That to me suggests that he was just a malicious troll.

It might suggest to someone less egocentric that poche simply thought it was none of your business, especially as your status at this site is no more official than his was.

Poche is gone, and very few people hereabouts regret his dismissal (I don't). But showering ceaseless insults on a guy who is in no position to respond is anything but admirable. What's next for you, Ladislaus? How long will it be till you start telling us all what you've been eating for dinner, whether it's Friday or not? And will those comments be as overbearing as your other comments are?

claudel · « **Reply #153 on:** October 16, 2020, 03:42:52 PM »

Quote from: Incredulous on October 16, 2020, 03:17:08 PM

I have started to like Meg. … I’ve thought of her positions as an +ABL ultra-loyalist, and maybe a sede-phobe. But that’s okay.

There's a lot of good-heartedness in this comment. Thumbs way up.

The one thing that sounds a bit discordant to me concerns loyalty to Archbishop Lefebvre. I don't see how that can be taken too far.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #154 on:** October 16, 2020, 04:55:28 PM »

Quote from: claudel on October 16, 2020, 03:35:05 PM

He did not refuse to answer. Rather, he simply didn't answer. As an exercise in self-control, Ladislaus, try writing fifty tendentiousness-free words every day.

It might suggest to someone less egocentric that poche simply thought it was none of your business, especially as your status at this site is no more official than his was.

Poche is gone, and very few people hereabouts regret his dismissal (I don't). But showering ceaseless insults on a guy who is in no position to respond is anything but admirable. What's next for you, Ladislaus? How long will it be till you start telling us all what you've been eating for dinner, whether it's Friday or not? And will those comments be as overbearing as your other comments are?

Still posterior-hurting over my calling you out for your vulgar insults, I see.

I think that they need to put your picture next to the dictionary entry for "hypocrite", attacking me for "insults" after your vulgar puerile insults on this very thread. BTW, calling poche a malicious troll was not an insult, but speculation regarding his motive for being on his forum. That term "trolling" refers to a type of behavior and malicious refers to a motivation other than just for personal amusement ... i.e. to create problems for Traditional Catholics. And the comment was in the context of speculation that this "Spork" character might be an alternate account for poche himself, and not the proverbial beating of a dead horse who is "gone".

In having asked him to explain his motivations, it was to give him an opportunity to rule out that he was nothing but a troll, since his behavior strongly suggested that he was trolling.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Poche is banned (Read 16088 times)

Incredulous

Re: Poche is banned

Matto

Re: Poche is banned

claudel

Re: Poche is banned

claudel

Re: Poche is banned

Ladislaus

Re: Poche is banned