Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Lets give up MS Windows for Lent  (Read 1188 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AlligatorDicax

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 908
  • Reputation: +372/-173
  • Gender: Male
Lets give up MS Windows for Lent
« on: February 08, 2016, 09:43:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here's a wild & crazy idea: For as many of us on CathInfo as practical, let's give up MS Windows for Lent.

    How?

    Quote from: Ziff-Davis tech-writers, being successors of PC Magazine
    [....] you just need to download Mint and install it on an USB drive with at least 8 GBs of room.  With that drive, you can boot your XP box to Mint and give it a try without making any permanent changes to your PC. 

    How convenient, then--could it be divinely motivated?--that as of Quinquagesima (i.e.: Shrove) Sunday, a U.S. big-box retail chain 
    • is offering a 32 GB flash drive for $9+U.S.-state sales-tax (total <= $10)[$]. Actually quite low, as prices for techie tools go.  I assume that the techie price savings are offered as additional clearance prices for devices that're limited to the nominally outdated but-still-compatible USB 2.0 interface [$$].

      I intend to follow the path above for my Lenten sacrifice.  More on my progress later, assuming that I don't disable what's nowadays a really limited hand-me-down PC: Hardware more than a decade old, whose single CPU runs at barely more than 1 GHz., and whose motherboard's RAM slots are fully stuffed, but even so, contain only 1/2 GB.

      -------
      Note *:  <http://www.zdnet.com/article/why-linux-mint-is-a-worthwhile-windows-xp-replacement/>.

      Note @: To avoid disturbing CathInfo's occasional income from more-corporate sources, the retailer might avoid search engines but be recognizable if identified by their yellow-&-black theme, or if sarcastically matching the alliteration of their storefront name--um, I dunno--Botched Bug?

      Note $: For folks on a grimly limited fixed income, that's comparable to the retail cost of 3 × 5-lb. ("2.27 kg") bags of brown rice.  Which in some instances, could indeed be more important to readers than techie tools.

      Note $$: I urge readers not to overlook the possibility that this might be an excellent opportunity to purchase more as back-up storage for retroactively important--but "never actually got around to printing" photographic images, but I know I'm again digressing to a theme for which I've joined earlier high-tech "voices crying out in the wilderness".

      -------
      Predecessor topic: "Linux Mint 17.3 a great operating system
      and it's free": <http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Linux-Mint-173-a-great-operating-system-and-its-free>.


    Offline AlligatorDicax

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 908
    • Reputation: +372/-173
    • Gender: Male
    Lets give up MS Windows for Lent
    « Reply #1 on: March 22, 2016, 12:01:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This posting is intended as an account of complications to my initial efforts to give up Windows for Lent.  Of course, God knows that I'm intending my ostentatious sacrifice to be mitigated by installing and becoming able to use GNU/Linux instead of any version of malware-attracting Windows.

    Alas, I've learned that it won't be as simple in my situation as I'd expected: So I must confess that I've uncovered good news and bad news.  I do believe that there will soon be good news to follow--and remedy--what is now bad news for my efforts:

    Quote from: Clem for blog.linuxmint.com/?p=2753 (Jan. 11, 2015, 4:59 am)
    The [Mint] team is proud to announce the release of Linux Mint 17.1 “Rebecca” Xfce[**] [....]
    Make sure to read the “Release Notes” <www.linuxmint.com/rel_rebecca_xfce.php> to be aware of important info or known issues related to this release.
    System requirements:
    · x86 processor
    • (Linux Mint 32-bit works on both 32-bit and 64-bit processors [<-but->] Linux Mint-64-bit requires a 64-bit processor)
      · 512 MB RAM ([but !] 1 GB recommended for a comfortable usage)[##].
      · 10 GB of disk space
      · DVD drive or USB port [....]

    -------
    Note *: "Linux Mint 17.1 'Rebecca' Xfce[**] released!  Written by Clem on Sunday, January 11th, 2015 @ 4:59 am". <http://blog.linuxmint.com/?p=2753>.  "Clem" is Linux Mint "Project Leader" Clement Lefebvre of France.

    Note **: "XFCE" is a reputedly lower-load Graphical User-Interface alternative to Maté, which was named in a Mint testimonial elsewhere on CathInfo (presumably <http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Linux-Mint-173-a-great-operating-system-and-its-free>).

    Note #: "x86 processor" is a generic term for the intel-or-AMD CPU that almost everyone who is now using a desktop PC running Windows XP, Vista, or 7, now has inside its mysterious outermost box.  I assume that desktop PCs are the most common case for CathInfo members who have oldish computers.  The most likely exceptions are members who have the shrunken laptops that were marketed as "netbooks"; not having such a computer myself, readers will need to seek the advice of a Linux advocate who also has one.

    Note ##: When frugal PC users publicly lament minimum RAM requirements, a common response is "RAM is cheap!", often expressed callously, and sometimes even with an audible sneer.  About which, more presently in a separate posting.


    Offline AlligatorDicax

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 908
    • Reputation: +372/-173
    • Gender: Male
    Lets give up MS Windows for Lent
    « Reply #2 on: March 22, 2016, 12:59:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: AlligatorDicax (Mar 22, 2016, 1:01 pm)
    When frugal PC users publicly lament minimum RAM requirements, a common response is "RAM is cheap!", often expressed callously, and sometimes even with an audible sneer.

    RAM can be "cheap" indeed, but there are 3 possible situations, which ought to be recognized by a more charitable onlooker:

    · Some RAM sockets are empty inside the PC: Adding RAM might be a quick remedy.  The RAM need not be new; it can be salvaged from some other PC, if the type & speed can be matched.  Mom-&-pop computer-or-electronics stores can be a useful source of types of RAM memory-modules that're of a type too old to be still available from the retail "usual suspects" (I'd prefer that the store has an operational RAM-testing device whose results can easily be watched by its customers).

    · All RAM sockets are full inside the PC, but not all of those sockets have memory-modules of the maximum capacity: Then replacing 1 or more modules might provide a remedy.  It's not sufficient to have the modules fit physically in the sockets inside the PC, because the maximum capacity is determined not only by the physical design of the RAM sockets, but also by limits or restrictions imposed by the circuit-boards or BIOS, and those limits might've been motivated by marketing, not engineering.  Among the possible engineering restrictions might be a requirement that the modules match in capacity & speed.  So one might need to find & check docuмentation, whether neglected & dusty on a book-shelf, in a never-before-opened file on the PC's original hard-disk, or available via the Internet.  For such docuмentation, don't overlook Web sites that sell RAM, and provide information for specific PC models from specific manufacturers, especially if a manufacturer has disappeared from the Internet, or has obnoxiously deleted its own information on that specific model of its own PCs (readers might easily guess how I'm became aware of that scenario).  But there's also the situation I've left until last:

    · All RAM sockets are full inside the PC, and each of those sockets has a memory-module of the maximum capacity: It can be the least enviable situation.

    Quote from: AlligatorDicax (Feb 8, 2016, 9:43 pm)
    [...] nowadays a really limited hand-me-down PC: Hardware [...] whose single CPU runs at barely more than 1 GHz., and whose motherboard's RAM slots are fully stuffed, but even so, [those slots] contain only 1/2 GB [RAM].

    Sigh.  As the immediately preceding quote shows, it is indeed my situation.

    So Linux Mint might not be a workable solution for me.  Fortunately, there are alternative solutions.