Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Laramie Banned from Fisheaters!  (Read 17140 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LaramieHirsch

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2718
  • Reputation: +956/-248
  • Gender: Male
    • h
Laramie Banned from Fisheaters!
« on: June 28, 2015, 06:25:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I was thinking about being discrete about his.  I was thinking of trying to contact the Fisheaters moderator first, maybe have an e-mail exchange, try to work it out....

    Nah.  She's completely blocked me.  6-7 years of contributing to her forum, and she threw me out with no explanation, recourse, or say.  

    I, therefore, have decided to go full assault, and I will wear this new banishment as another badge.  The gun ports are open.  She is no longer Vox Clamantis.  She is Tracy.  All conversation about her fem-lib forum of effeminate pseudo-gαy orbiters is now on the table.

    Let her infamy ring across the countryside far and wide.  I turned a blind eye towards her idiocy.  Now...I shall refer to her again, and again...as an example of modern Catholic stupidity. My field work and research of the failure of Catholics in the West continues, and Tracy of Fisheaters The gαy Sewing Circle is now the specimen.  If the dunce knew how to forgive seventy times seven, get over her narcissism, and have a reasonable discussion with me, I might be inclined to hold off on pointing out all of her faults.  But today, it is clear that she wishes to be no friend of mine.

    Ladies and gentlemen, I give you:

    Fisheaters: The gαy Sewing Circle

     :dancing-banana:  :jumping2:  :dancing-banana:
    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle


    Offline Centroamerica

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2655
    • Reputation: +1641/-438
    • Gender: Male
    Laramie Banned from Fisheaters!
    « Reply #1 on: June 28, 2015, 06:44:01 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: LaramieHirsch
    I was thinking about being discrete about his.  I was thinking of trying to contact the Fisheaters moderator first, maybe have an e-mail exchange, try to work it out....

    Nah.  She's completely blocked me.  6-7 years of contributing to her forum, and she threw me out with no explanation, recourse, or say.  

    I, therefore, have decided to go full assault, and I will wear this new banishment as another badge.  The gun ports are open.  She is no longer Vox Clamantis.  She is Tracy.  All conversation about her fem-lib forum of effeminate pseudo-gαy orbiters is now on the table.

    Let her infamy ring across the countryside far and wide.  I turned a blind eye towards her idiocy.  Now...I shall refer to her again, and again...as an example of modern Catholic stupidity. My field work and research of the failure of Catholics in the West continues, and Tracy of Fisheaters The gαy Sewing Circle is now the specimen.  If the dunce knew how to forgive seventy times seven, get over her narcissism, and have a reasonable discussion with me, I might be inclined to hold off on pointing out all of her faults.  But today, it is clear that she wishes to be no friend of mine.

    Ladies and gentlemen, I give you:

    Fisheaters: The gαy Sewing Circle

     :dancing-banana:  :jumping2:  :dancing-banana:



    She becomes an accomplice to the sin and risks eternal chastisement.
    We conclude logically that religion can give an efficacious and truly realistic answer to the great modern problems only if it is a religion that is profoundly lived, not simply a superficial and cheap religion made up of some vocal prayers and some ceremonies...


    Offline Ursus

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 317
    • Reputation: +137/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Laramie Banned from Fisheaters!
    « Reply #2 on: June 28, 2015, 10:06:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • One could say it's drama and scandal to discuss FE  but it's worth mentioning. That forum is under the guise of traditional Catholic values then wallops you over the head with sodomy friendly, sex changing is ok discussions. Anyone who disagrees gets banned.

    Catholics from the NO have a lot of problems, but when then begin to research tradition and get that garbage, it's just another outlet for confusion and evil.


    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 16478
    • Reputation: +4866/-1803
    • Gender: Female
    Laramie Banned from Fisheaters!
    « Reply #3 on: June 28, 2015, 10:34:49 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • She did you a favor.   I have never been a member of that forum or any other.
    I do facebook, Cathinfo, Dressing with dignity, remnant, Church militant, etc.  I don't have time to be on chat forums.  

    The problem is that Catholics aren't being taught the faith.
    Many in our area even believe that Jesus sinned while on earth.
    Tracy and others need prayers for conversion to the true Catholic faith.
    Tracy, Jesus in His own words says marriage between man and woman.
    You deny Christ by supporting and condoning same sex marriage and sodomy and divorce.  Sorry, but you and those on Fisheaters aren't Catholic.  Jesus says go and sin no more.
    You support sodomists who have no intent on repenting including the hostile lesbians who perform sɛҳuąƖ perversion using Crucifixes in Rome.  When you support sodomy, you support the sɛҳuąƖ abuse of children.  












    May God bless you and keep you

    Offline Jaynek

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3874
    • Reputation: +1993/-1112
    • Gender: Female
    Laramie Banned from Fisheaters!
    « Reply #4 on: June 28, 2015, 10:56:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I was banned from FE in October 2013.  (I had to look it up.)



    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 16478
    • Reputation: +4866/-1803
    • Gender: Female
    Laramie Banned from Fisheaters!
    « Reply #5 on: June 28, 2015, 11:04:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Fisheaters claims to be "traditional" and "Catholic".  
    Isn't that misleading?   Fisheaters seems liberal and immoral.  
    May God bless you and keep you

    Online Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13825
    • Reputation: +5568/-865
    • Gender: Male
    Laramie Banned from Fisheaters!
    « Reply #6 on: June 29, 2015, 06:27:11 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Shake the dust and be glad you're gone. FE is aptly named as it's goal is to eat up the fishes who are seeking the truth and spit them out into the pit.
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31202
    • Reputation: +27121/-495
    • Gender: Male
    Laramie Banned from Fisheaters!
    « Reply #7 on: July 02, 2015, 08:03:21 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I was banned from FE maybe 9-10 months after I started CathInfo -- so it was sometime in 2007.

    It's been a LONG time, so weeks go by without even thinking about Fisheaters now. I'll admit that wasn't always so. It used to be the largest Traditional Catholic forum, and even the banned members kept half an eye on it from time to time. But who can say that with a "straight" face now? (pardon the pun)

    It's gone so far downhill, at some point

    A) all real Trads absolutely have to leave
    B) you have to stop even considering it a Trad forum

    All joking aside, and in all honesty, I've stopped considering Fisheaters to be my competition a long time ago. I don't consider Catholic Answers to be competition either. In both cases, anyone who belongs on those forums certainly wouldn't belong on or enjoy CathInfo. Just like a fancy restaurant ($50 or more for a meal, serving wine, everyone dressed up) doesn't consider McDonald's to be its competition, even though they both technically serve food.

    First of all, if the most conservative members there are "Indult" Catholics, then it's not a Trad forum. I barely consider Indult Trads to be Traditional Catholics, since they don't believe the number one basic principle of a Traditional Catholic: "Catholics have a right by virtue of their baptism to doubt-free Sacraments and doubt-free priests. The Novus Ordo is dangerous to the Faith. Therefore it is licit and even required to disobey any authority, including the Pope, which suggests we place our faith in danger by making use of doubtful priests/sacraments and dangerous liturgy".

    So although I disagree with both Indult Catholics as well as Sedevacantists, at least Sedes qualify as Traditional Catholic. Indult Catholics, if they believe they have to have permission to attend the Latin Mass (they only attend Masses "in union with Rome"), are to be called Conservative Catholics.

    If Catholic forums were liturgy, Fisheaters would have people dancing in the aisles, clown Masses, and rock music playing during Mass by now.

    Any frogs still in that pot are fully dead and boiled, ready for the table.

    Fisheaters is now Catholic Answers with a thin veneer of "supporting the Latin Mass". But get dogmatic and objective about any Catholic dogmas or morality, and you're likely to get in trouble! Perhaps Catholic Answers is more conservative than Fisheaters in some ways now.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline BTNYC

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2777
    • Reputation: +3122/-97
    • Gender: Male
    Laramie Banned from Fisheaters!
    « Reply #8 on: July 02, 2015, 03:28:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matthew
    Perhaps Catholic Answers is more conservative than Fisheaters in some ways now.


    No "perhaps" about it. Not even CAF ever stooped so low as to give official approval to transsɛҳuąƖism, or to argue that it is licit based on a "sub secretum" Vatican docuмent.

    May that cesspit collapse and disappear before the year is out. May the sodomite who was coddled and protected there be rendered unable to ever poison another soul. May the public adulteress who mannishly lords her ill-gotten authority as moderator be converted, and spend the remainder of her life in prayer,penance, and in the humble silence that befits her sex and station in life.

    Offline LaramieHirsch

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2718
    • Reputation: +956/-248
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Laramie Banned from Fisheaters!
    « Reply #9 on: July 02, 2015, 06:36:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Now that I'm gone, Tracy decided to post a big explanation as to why she deleted an entire subfolder called "Take Back the Net."  

    It seems that she and I had a disagreement.  

    I was arguing for the robust re-taking of social spaces by Catholics.  (Quite a challenge now, considering the emboldened Left after last week's Supreme Court decision.)  I was arguing for the use of rhetoric mixed with dialectic, and its tactical application is to win with superior 'force.'  In olden days, people used to do this as a part of their civic duty.  Nowadays, its frowned upon as bigoted shaming techniques.

    Tracy, on the other hand, is under the impression that we are supposed to convert everyone we encounter in a comment box.  I liken such a goal to going to a nightclub and trying to convert everyone.

    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle

    Offline Jaynek

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3874
    • Reputation: +1993/-1112
    • Gender: Female
    Laramie Banned from Fisheaters!
    « Reply #10 on: July 02, 2015, 07:17:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It can be difficult to tell who is banned on FE.  Sometimes banned members have this written under their names and sometimes they do not.   I know of several banned people, including myself, who do not have "banned" under their names.  It looks like Laramie will be in this category too.

    It is better to be consistent about this sort of thing.


    Offline poche

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 16730
    • Reputation: +1218/-4688
    • Gender: Male
    Laramie Banned from Fisheaters!
    « Reply #11 on: July 02, 2015, 11:20:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: LaramieHirsch
    Now that I'm gone, Tracy decided to post a big explanation as to why she deleted an entire subfolder called "Take Back the Net."  

    It seems that she and I had a disagreement.  

    I was arguing for the robust re-taking of social spaces by Catholics.  (Quite a challenge now, considering the emboldened Left after last week's Supreme Court decision.)  I was arguing for the use of rhetoric mixed with dialectic, and its tactical application is to win with superior 'force.'  In olden days, people used to do this as a part of their civic duty.  Nowadays, its frowned upon as bigoted shaming techniques.

    Tracy, on the other hand, is under the impression that we are supposed to convert everyone we encounter in a comment box.  I liken such a goal to going to a nightclub and trying to convert everyone.


    I pray for the conversion of everyone to the Catholic Faith
     :pray: :pray: :pray:

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Laramie Banned from Fisheaters!
    « Reply #12 on: July 03, 2015, 10:27:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't mind at all that I was banned from F.E., but then I believe that it ceased long ago in being able to do any good in promoting tradition (if it ever did).

    Regarding Catholic Answers, which I've not been banned from, I have to wonder if its a sin to post there. I have to agree with Matthew that it's perhaps more conservative, or allows the conservative view to be promoted there, but there's a problem there too, IMO.

    While CAF allows the conservative view, it also allows the views of progressive or modernist Catholics to have an equal say. It also allows non-Catholics to promote anti-Catholic views. My question is this: is it a sin to participate on a board such as CAF (and FE) which promote things which have been anathematized by popes in the past? Does anyone know? Maybe this is a question for another thread.
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline OHCA

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2833
    • Reputation: +1866/-111
    • Gender: Male
    Laramie Banned from Fisheaters!
    « Reply #13 on: July 03, 2015, 11:01:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: LaramieHirsch
    . . .

    Nah.  She's completely blocked me.  6-7 years of contributing to her forum, and she threw me out with no explanation, recourse, or say.

    . . .

    I turned a blind eye towards her idiocy.


    Expedient opportunistic little shit, aren't you.

    I'm not a defender of Tracy by a long shot--but looks like you're tasting sour grapes.

    Offline LaramieHirsch

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2718
    • Reputation: +956/-248
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Laramie Banned from Fisheaters!
    « Reply #14 on: July 03, 2015, 02:00:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: OHCA
    Quote from: LaramieHirsch
    . . .

    Nah.  She's completely blocked me.  6-7 years of contributing to her forum, and she threw me out with no explanation, recourse, or say.

    . . .

    I turned a blind eye towards her idiocy.


    Expedient opportunistic little shit, aren't you.

    I'm not a defender of Tracy by a long shot--but looks like you're tasting sour grapes.


     :roll-laugh1:

    Your spite always brings a smile to my face!
    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle