Author Topic: Is one of the posters at fisheaters a transɛҳuąƖ? (Read 93512 times)

Mithrandylan · « **Reply #205 on:** June 27, 2013, 10:18:26 PM »

Amen, Obscurus.

Mithrandylan · « **Reply #206 on:** June 27, 2013, 10:24:56 PM »

Quote from: Hatchc

Quote from: TheKnightVigilant
Quote from: wallflower
And there we have it. The messenger is shot. Sigh. I knew it deep down but tried to carry a smidgen of hope.

http://catholicforum.fisheaters.com/index.php/topic,3459517.msg33909042.html#msg33909042

I mean, if a person can't make the difference between being a sinner but conforming your life to the Faith and the Church or being a sinner and working to conform the Faith and the Church to your sin AND influencing others to do so as well...it's just kind of a lost cause.

Who the hell is this loggats guy? Since when was Catholicism about slushy, syrupy, lovey-dovey hippy charity? That's false love and false charity. Does this "loggats" seriously think he has anything of the spirit of the great Catholic heroes and saints of history about him?

He calls cathinfo "a brood of vipers" and "as hellish as it gets", but gives this filthy sodomite "clare" nothing but charitable words and encouragement? Despite knowing the sickening details? Ugh.

He's probably a fag.

Before I was banned, I remember loggats creating a thread in order to defend cross-dressing as an art, and I'm not kidding. Being banned, I can't search through his post history but it's there.

If he's not a queer, he certainly shows a lot of affection towards them, and animosity and vitriol towards those who aren't sensitive to their feelings. At which point he will say that Christianity is all about love.

He is thoroughly Novus Ordo, and has admitted as much. Vox will take whoever she can as a minion. A lot of her queens are gone now, but she's got a few Novus Ordo males to count on now.

Jaynek · « **Reply #207 on:** June 27, 2013, 10:39:04 PM »

Quote from: Mithrandylan

He is a man who wants to be a woman, is attracted to men, and romantically involved in them, and has said all of the above on FE. I don't get it. What's different now where all of a sudden he's 'in bad faith?' Why is what we found even a surprise? It matches what he's already made known about himself perfectly.

I thought he was really trying to be a good Catholic I thought he was attracted to men but resisting it.

Graham · « **Reply #208 on:** June 27, 2013, 10:42:34 PM »

Quote from: Jaynek

Quote from: Mithrandylan
Quote from: Jaynek
Quote from: wallflower

In an effort to be seen as not "judging" him, it's a real possibility that nothing will be done, even though his active and evil influence is crystal clear to anyone with eyes to see.

Even if Vox does nothing, Impy's credibility has been destroyed by this revelation. I do not expect him to have much influence any more, even if he dares to post.

No it hasn't.

A forum's owner has tremendous influence on it's posters. As long as she defends Impy, the main crowd there won't see the big deal. Also, I thought you called him Clare?

My decision to call Impy Clare was based on the assumption that he was posting in good faith. His credibility has been destroyed as far as I am concerned and I am re-evaluating the conclusions I reached.

Which conclusions, exactly?

Your switching from her to him gives the lie to the false charity you were practising. How could his "credibility" effect whether he should be treated like a woman? It doesn't. You were humouring his evil fantasies.

Meanwhile Vox is doubling down on tolerance talk. Might re-evaluate her while you're at it.

Mithrandylan · « **Reply #209 on:** June 27, 2013, 10:43:11 PM »

Not sure how you thought someone who is a man but living as a woman was resisting sinful urges, but, as they say "now you know!"