Quis and Vox should've just stopped with the articles. Starting the forum was like opening the pit of hell.

An FE fan must have thumbed me down.

I don't consider myself the sharpest tool in the tool shed, but I knew Vox was a fraud within days of discovering her forum years back. When I read this rule in her Judaism subforum I knew I was a dealing with a fake Catholic:

There will be no talk of "the Jєωs" without qualification. But, you say, one can speak of "the Muslims" and "the Palestinians" and "the cheese-eating surrender monkeys." Yes, this is so, and the ridiculous unfairness of the situation is duly noted; I've written about it myself plenty of times. But deal with reality, folks. As above, if you can't "hear" how the phrase "the Jєωs" -- as opposed, say, to "the Jєωιѕн people as a group" or "Jєωιѕн leaders" -- is heard by the average person who's gotten a typical, "post-Shoah" education, then you lack the subtlety to post here. Given American leaders'  excruciatingly painful and obvious Israel-worship, anything said about Israeli-American politics will freak the typical American out. Same with any rightful criticism of Jєωιѕн leadership or the Jєωιѕн religion. But there is no need to be stupid about it. The point of communicating is, um, communicating -- getting a point across. You won't do that if the person turns off because you sound like a bigot to them (even if you're not).

Every saint and Church Doctor would not be able to post about Jєωs on her forum. Not to mention Jesus. "The Jєωs are enemies of the Church." "The Jєωs are children of the devil." "The Jєωs are a cursed people." None of those statements are allowed on Fisheaters.

Catholics condemn Jєωs as a body not because they lack subtlety but because they lack dishonesty. Notice how she tries to spin it, so that people who proclaim the truth about the Jєωs are somehow unintelligent or unsophisticated?

She fails the Jєω test. And so everything else I've learned about her in the ensuing years (like her weird sɛҳuąƖ ideas) has come as no surprise to me.

ggreg recently gave Vox $500. I wonder if he's regretting it.

Not really, it was four or five years ago and I definitely had my money's worth.  As any investor knows "you can't win 'em all".

Do you regret the money you gave to "the nine", or to the SSPX that got spent by Max Krah or Bishop Fellay?  Shit happens.

I won't be making any further donations.  There has been too much fαɢɢօtt worship at the site over the last year.

Quote from: ServusSpiritusSancti

An FE fan must have thumbed me down.

Or someone who thinks FE and CAF are both as bad as each other.

It was not me by the way.

Maybe.

Just to clarify, I do not think CAF is a good forum at all. It's a joke just like FE.

I just vomited.

I shouldn't be so curios.

 

I did warn you.

HarlequinKing. He used to have the handle Archbishop10K.

He's one of the weirdos with whom Vox likes to surround herself. I don't think he's a transɛҳuąƖ though. He just has a love of Victorian fashion. StevusMagnus once called him HarlequinQueen, but I think that was in jest. Anyway, ggreg should know because he recently visited him. HK is racially insecure and acts as the PC race enforcer over on FE. Vox sent him a sword (i think) in the mail years ago and he's been her pet ever since.

He's a decent chap, head screw on correctly it would appear to me.  He is certainly not a weido.  Obviously people who have not had a Catholic upbringing are not always as dyed in the wool as those who have.  He's a convert from seventh day adventism or something like that.  On that thread HK is certainly not taking the side of the trannies, nor have I ever seen him post or opine anything to that effect.

I'd define him as moderate SSPX, Conservative Eccelsia Dei.  I think he would agree with that assessment as fair.  I'm a sort of worn out fossil SSPX from the 1970s with bullshitphobia.  I've seen a lot of crap from every camp of Tradition over 35 years.  My philosophy could best be described by Treebeard.

I am not altogether on anybody's side, because nobody is altogether on my side,

HarlequinKing is a young man with a sense of fashion, pretty arty, writer historian type, nothing wrong with that.  We can't all be jocks or test-pilot types.  He certainly does not dress in Victorian clothes most of the time.  It is a hobby, an interest, not an all consuming passion.

HarlequinKing is a young man with a sense of fashion, pretty arty

There is definitely something wrong with that.  You are a moderinist thereform you find nothing wrong with it.  

Tradition and Scripture are clear--men who adorn themselves in feminine garb are an abomination.