Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Introduction and "Fish Eaters" Discussion  (Read 33045 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 32676
  • Reputation: +28944/-581
  • Gender: Male
Introduction and "Fish Eaters" Discussion
« Reply #105 on: March 27, 2009, 09:24:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes, I'm sure you enjoyed his presence on Fisheaters -- but just remember, most of us who "left" Fisheaters left because our access to the forum was revoked, usually on a weak excuse or false pretense.

    I bet none of those "booted from FE" were booted because they were spamming, cussing, blaspheming, posting porn -- you get the idea. But disagreeing with the mods? That's a different story.

    Matthew
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 32676
    • Reputation: +28944/-581
    • Gender: Male
    Introduction and "Fish Eaters" Discussion
    « Reply #106 on: March 27, 2009, 10:07:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Welcome to the forum.

    To clarify, those things I listed (cussing, posting porn, etc.) were examples of behavior that would merit a banning. I was just mentioning that most "ex-Fisheaters" on here were not banned for any good reason. That's all.

    On another note, I haven't seen Stevus on here for days.

    Matthew
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    Introduction and "Fish Eaters" Discussion
    « Reply #107 on: March 27, 2009, 11:28:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Quomodo
    Quote from: Miss_Fluffy
    Well, there's certainly plenty of slander and detraction around here for everyone to see.  No need to get it elsewhere!


    There is one significant difference, though, I think:  over here they don't make any pretensions.  Over there the Forum Owner has stated many times he had no desire for a forum war.  He broke his own word.  He damaged his own credibility--espicially in making public his home situation.  NOTHING needed be said.  Noone can claim the moral high road in this debacle.



    How so, what is going on with domestic situation???
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

    Offline MaterDominici

    • Mod
    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 5583
    • Reputation: +4319/-100
    • Gender: Female
    Introduction and "Fish Eaters" Discussion
    « Reply #108 on: March 27, 2009, 02:58:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: scipio_a
    Glad I found you.  You seem to be posting here and not on AQ any longer.  


    If you're really looking for Stevus, I'd check Incorruptibles. I think he only used this board to vent. He hasn't posted here since he finished his venting about his FE situation.

    Offline stevusmagnus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3728
    • Reputation: +826/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Introduction and "Fish Eaters" Discussion
    « Reply #109 on: April 23, 2009, 12:21:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Belloc,

    Apparently Quis and Vox made public their intention to marry a few years ago even though they were both married to other people at the time (and I beileve still are). It is really a sad situation and one that they continually publicly justify to the scandal of many. We must continue to pray for them.

    After their initial "revealing" of the situation resulting in many posters at the time being banned/ leaving, they have been silent about it, though the situation has not changed. I'd say a vast majority of posters have no idea that the authors/ owners of the site, espousing "Traditional Catholicism" are themselves in an irregular marital situation with kids involved. It really is a scandal and sad for all involved.

    What makes matters worse is the lack of any realization of the gravity of the situation from those involved. They simply go about spending hours of time running a "Catholic" website when their own house is falling apart. Doesn't scripture say something about taking the plank out of one's own eye before removing the splinter of one's neighbor?

    In order to run an internet apostolate that bears fruit, one must take care of one's own soul first and foremost. No matter how much you've studied Tradition, no matter how many books and encyclicals you've pored over, no matter how many discussions you've learned from, if your soul is not right, you are open to influences from the devil and to stray from the path.

    Being separated from the events on FE for some time, and all of the boards in general I've gained some perspective. What you really have on FE is confusion and that's where the board had its problems, and from what Scipio tells me, is still having problems. Most of the posters there could not even define Traditional Catholicism. All sorts of Traditional liturgical practices were up for grabs there. They seemingly agreed on the TLM, but with the options they threw out, the TLM may as well have been the same experimental playground of the NO. They basically wanted to reshape the TLM in their own image.

    The liberality of their liturgical views really mirrored the liberality of their moral views. Many members had made concessions with the world, considering listening to hard rock, metal as a-ok, cursing is ok, immodest dress is a matter of opinion, talk about sex is ok "we don't want to be prudes", etc.

    Knowing now the irregular moral situation of the owners, it makes sense. This sort of intellectual liberalism was encouraged, even if perhaps subconsciously while any viewpoints which pricked their consciences were stamped out and reacted to.

    I really think that until the owners change their hearts and realize that they need to take care of their situation for the sake of their souls, their children, their families, etc. the sad state of the site will continue, leading many innocent souls into more and more confusion and ultimately a rejection of Catholicism because of it.

    God can only bless endeavors taken in truth and humility. The owners have chosen to harden their hearts to their own situation and it is skewing everything they do. Because of this God cannot bless their work. We should all pray for the site owners, because until they change their hearts the board is simply broken.

    As for me, I'm pretty much retired from the discussion board business and it has been a blessing. Scipio found me off-line and thus I found this thread. Otherwise I've concentrated on my spiritual life and real world concerns and it has profited me greatly. There are still some quality Catholic boards out there, but I'd be careful about spending too much time even on them. The world and the Church move on no matter how many microns we spend discussiong them in cyber space. Better to get out there and put your faith in action.

    In any case, all the best to Scipio and Chant, etc. and God Bless you all!

    StevusMagnus


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 32676
    • Reputation: +28944/-581
    • Gender: Male
    Introduction and "Fish Eaters" Discussion
    « Reply #110 on: April 23, 2009, 12:27:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I agree with much of what you said...but I'm confused about one thing.

    "scipio found me offline, and thus I found this thread"

    Does that mean you only found this thread because scipio told you about it?

    Because -- I hate to break it to you -- you STARTED this thread, friend! :laugh1:

    Matthew
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline stevusmagnus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3728
    • Reputation: +826/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Introduction and "Fish Eaters" Discussion
    « Reply #111 on: April 23, 2009, 12:54:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Chant,

    Yes, correct, I did start this thread! Haha. ;)

    I meant, that after months Scipio messaged me and thus I found the thread again as a result.

    Hope you are doing well, Chant!

    Offline spouse of Jesus

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1903
    • Reputation: +336/-4
    • Gender: Female
    Introduction and "Fish Eaters" Discussion
    « Reply #112 on: April 24, 2009, 12:15:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You were abscent for a long time. Happy that you are back. :applause:


    Offline spouse of Jesus

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1903
    • Reputation: +336/-4
    • Gender: Female
    Introduction and "Fish Eaters" Discussion
    « Reply #113 on: April 25, 2009, 02:10:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I will answer you:
    a fisheater is a trad just for TLM, but is a modernist in all other things. If a fisheater is married, you will hear him/her speaking about her wonderfull *** all the time, not to mention diappers, and divorce! gluttony, vanity and  femminism are so common there. And if tell them to be more modest and moderate, you are accused of insulting a sacrament. when I came to cathinfo, I couldn't believe that Dawn, and many others are married and that Chant is so young, because when I compared to fisheaters, they seem too modest to be so!

    Offline Dawn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2439
    • Reputation: +47/-1
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    Introduction and "Fish Eaters" Discussion
    « Reply #114 on: April 25, 2009, 07:06:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thank you dear. That is one of my main problems with Fisheater's. They can put all the disclaimers up that they want, but, in the end the shall answer for the scandal caused by people (especially the young) reading about what should not be discussed in public. They should have enough sense to know that a warning "not for persons 18 and under" does not keep children from entering porn sites. And, please nobody bother to rush to tell me that the good people are trying to inform and teach those with questions about what happens between a husband and wife. They should say ask your mother, your father or your priest. Our Lady said that more souls go to hell because of lust.

    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +28/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Introduction and "Fish Eaters" Discussion
    « Reply #115 on: April 25, 2009, 09:16:24 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: stevusmagnus
    Chant,

    Yes, correct, I did start this thread! Haha. ;)

    I meant, that after months Scipio messaged me and thus I found the thread again as a result.

    Hope you are doing well, Chant!


    I wondered what happened to your blog.

    Good to see you posting here.


    Offline stevusmagnus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3728
    • Reputation: +826/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Introduction and "Fish Eaters" Discussion
    « Reply #116 on: April 25, 2009, 11:32:34 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Tele,

    No time to keep up with it anymore. Maybe I'll re-start another one sometime in the future.

    Hope you are doing well.

    Offline DeMaistre

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 343
    • Reputation: +15/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Introduction and "Fish Eaters" Discussion
    « Reply #117 on: May 09, 2009, 01:24:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I must say, that despite my being here only a few days now, I believe this thread to be a low point for this forum.

    I used to be one called "Rex_Tremendae" on the Fisheaters forum, with well over 2,000 posts under my belt - indeed, it can be said that Fisheaters taught me the Faith. Eventually, I deleted my account, myself being under 18 and left on good terms. While I do not support the union of QuisutDeus and VoxClamantis, neither do I revel in frivolous speculation or calumny. And while I do have several issues with the Fisheaters forum (which I do not have with this fine forum), I honestly find this thread to be somewhat ironic - see, there was almost an identical thread on Fisheaters ranting about how Cathinfo was so bad with all the members sucking up to QuisutDeus- similar to what I see here. Again, no offense, I love this forum, but I see this as unnecessary and perhaps an occasion of sin for some of the members here.

    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +28/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Introduction and "Fish Eaters" Discussion
    « Reply #118 on: July 15, 2009, 07:05:38 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: spouse of Jesus
    I will answer you:
    a fisheater is a trad just for TLM, but is a modernist in all other things. If a fisheater is married, you will hear him/her speaking about her wonderfull *** all the time, not to mention diappers, and divorce! gluttony, vanity and  femminism are so common there. And if tell them to be more modest and moderate, you are accused of insulting a sacrament. when I came to cathinfo, I couldn't believe that Dawn, and many others are married and that Chant is so young, because when I compared to fisheaters, they seem too modest to be so!


    Yes, you're exactly right about Fish Eaters.

    Right now they're downrating me for standing up for the proposition that a wife has a duty to make her husband a sandwich if he asks.

    Offline Dawn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2439
    • Reputation: +47/-1
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    Introduction and "Fish Eaters" Discussion
    « Reply #119 on: July 15, 2009, 08:11:48 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Really? I do that for my husband all the time. I also set up his coffee, make certain that his clothes are clean (I do not set them out for him.) I line up his vitamins.
    Fisheaters must forget that you do those things for Jesus when you do them for your spouse. That explains alot right there.