Author Topic: FE Might Close - Or Jayne Might Become a Moderator There (Read 79021 times)

LaramieHirsch · « **Reply #345 on:** October 26, 2013, 12:24:05 PM »

Quote from: 2Vermont

Because allowing only anti SV posts is soooooo a debate.

If you step back, you will see that the debate is across the forums and across the internet.

2Vermont · « **Reply #346 on:** October 26, 2013, 12:30:11 PM »

Quote from: LaramieHirsch

Quote from: 2Vermont
Because allowing only anti SV posts is soooooo a debate.

If you step back, you will see that the debate is across the forums and across the internet.

I understand your desire to keep snarky nasty gossipy ankle-biters off the forum. My suggestion then? Allow discussions of the schism of sedevacantism, so long as the discussions are against it. Do not allow pro-sedes to spread their pro-schismatic words. I mean, if being a sedevacantist is wrong, then surely it would not be wrong to ban pro-sede talk here and encourage anti-sede talk, would it? - Laramie Hirsch

There may be debate on the Internet, but that is not what you are advocating at FE.

::goes back to ignoring LH::

And Matthew, notice again a very clear judgment on LH's Part: "the schism of sedevacantism"; "pro-schismatic words"

Jaynek · « **Reply #347 on:** October 26, 2013, 12:48:11 PM »

Quote from: 2Vermont

And Matthew, notice again a very clear judgment on LH's Part: "the schism of sedevacantism"; "pro-schismatic words"

It isn't simply a judgment on SV as a theological position, there are negative assumptions about the character and behaviour of people who hold the position. I find that far more objectionable.

2Vermont · « **Reply #348 on:** October 26, 2013, 12:50:11 PM »

Quote from: Jaynek

Quote from: 2Vermont

And Matthew, notice again a very clear judgment on LH's Part: "the schism of sedevacantism"; "pro-schismatic words"

It isn't simply a judgment on SV as a theological position, there are negative assumptions about the character and behaviour of people who hold the position. I find that far more objectionable.

Dogmatic sedevacantists are not allowed to spout that others are in schism or heretics, etc...they get banned here. Dogmatic sedeplenists should not be allowed to do the same.

LaramieHirsch · « **Reply #349 on:** October 26, 2013, 12:59:27 PM »

Quote from: 2Vermont

Dogmatic sedevacantists are not allowed to spout that others are in schism or heretics, etc...they get banned here.

Lol! I've been called a schismatic all month! Not that I care.

It is no secret what I think, and it can be read in the Crisis subforu: http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Sedevacantism-is-schismatic

Two recommendations to you, 2Vermont.

1. Make your own blog if you don't feel like you're completely stating what you want here.

2. Click the red "HIDE" button if you are tired of listening to me.