Author Topic: FE Might Close - Or Jayne Might Become a Moderator There (Read 74066 times)

mikemac · « **Reply #75 on:** September 26, 2013, 07:38:22 PM »

Quote from: Devekut

The reason behind it is, according to the transgendered Attorney (impy/clare/guac) is that. he was teaching me a lesson. He put my face on his account so that I can picture myself in his shoes. I don't believe that for one second. Total BS but they are all ok with it. Actually, the majority are disgusted but the prominent figures are ok with it.

It really doesn't matter what Jayne, Vox or Christulsa think about it. IMO I would think it was a criminal offense of some kind. Identity theft possibly? And if Vox knows about it and doesn't do anything to correct it seeing she is the owner of the forum then she is contributing to the criminal offense as well.

Devekut · « **Reply #76 on:** September 26, 2013, 11:45:14 PM »

I agree. HE shouldn't have been using my photo as some sort of face to his appalling lifestyle. After I called him out on it he posted 3 or 4 more times before finally removing my face from his disgusting account. Vox thinks it isn't all that bad because it was for "only 2 minutes". It seemed much longer than that. It reminds me of this young female model whose image was used for an HIV ad without her knowledge or her consent. He was embarrassed and outraged. I'd hate for anyone to see his filthy account and see me walking down the street and assume I am him.

Now that pseudo SSPX christulsa is making threats to Whitey and myself. He says that we should be banned, called us the Jews that pointed their fingers at Jesus and screamed "crucifiy him!!!". He's obviously comparing gImpy to our Lord. He wants us to admit that we were wrong and promise to never bother gImpy, Clare, Guacamole or ANYONE ever again or he hopes that we are banned.

I think the real issue with this liberal SSPX (wow, never thought I would say that!) guy is that he had a crush on the female character GUACAMOLE and now that myself and others have brought it out to the day light that SHE is actually a HE christulsa feels like he has to continue the charade otherwise he'll have to admit he liked a man.

2Vermont · « **Reply #77 on:** September 27, 2013, 04:20:36 AM »

And now I see that St Pius of Trent has been warned by Vox after posting a Resistance/Sede topic. If I were still there I'd be leaving willingly. If that site remains it needs a major overhaul.

http://catholicforum.fisheaters.com/index.php/topic,3461028.0.html

poche · « **Reply #78 on:** September 27, 2013, 04:31:55 AM »

Quote from: Devekut

I agree. HE shouldn't have been using my photo as some sort of face to his appalling lifestyle. After I called him out on it he posted 3 or 4 more times before finally removing my face from his disgusting account. Vox thinks it isn't all that bad because it was for "only 2 minutes". It seemed much longer than that. It reminds me of this young female model whose image was used for an HIV ad without her knowledge or her consent. He was embarrassed and outraged. I'd hate for anyone to see his filthy account and see me walking down the street and assume I am him.

Now that pseudo SSPX christulsa is making threats to Whitey and myself. He says that we should be banned, called us the Jews that pointed their fingers at Jesus and screamed "crucifiy him!!!". He's obviously comparing gImpy to our Lord. He wants us to admit that we were wrong and promise to never bother gImpy, Clare, Guacamole or ANYONE ever again or he hopes that we are banned.

I think the real issue with this liberal SSPX (wow, never thought I would say that!) guy is that he had a crush on the female character GUACAMOLE and now that myself and others have brought it out to the day light that SHE is actually a HE christulsa feels like he has to continue the charade otherwise he'll have to admit he liked a man.

I have news for you, it was longer than two minutes.

poche · « **Reply #79 on:** September 27, 2013, 04:40:12 AM »

Quote from: 2Vermont

And now I see that St Pius of Trent has been warned by Vox after posting a Resistance/Sede topic. If I were still there I'd be leaving willingly. If that site remains it needs a major overhaul.

http://catholicforum.fisheaters.com/index.php/topic,3461028.0.html

They have a rule that they are willing to enforce that says that if you disrespect the pope you will be in trouble.

Matthew here says "Christ founded a visible Church with a priesthood, with a hierarchy and Pope at the head."

There is a traditionalist French language forum that says that if you disrespect the pope or Vatican II then you will be banned.

Stubborn · « **Reply #80 on:** September 27, 2013, 04:57:16 AM »

He'd have be fine if he posted about how to accept perverted queers for what they are.

poche · « **Reply #81 on:** September 27, 2013, 05:05:17 AM »

Quote from: Stubborn

He'd have be fine if he posted about how to accept perverted queers for what they are.

It would be better if he posted on how to overcome obstacles to holiness or how to overcome temptation.

Stubborn · « **Reply #82 on:** September 27, 2013, 05:15:18 AM »

The point is, for the most part FE is a Catholic forum in name only. When you post anything strictly Catholic or against the NO, you quickly find you are a minority at FE and not welcome.

Matthew · « **Reply #83 on:** September 27, 2013, 06:37:14 AM »

Quote from: Devekut

I'm the one whose image Impy/Clare/Guacamole stole for his own profile. I made a different user name for this forum, as MorganHiver isn't my real name anyway. The positive response that HE is receiving is absurd. Jayne, Vox, Christulsa (supposedly a staunch SSPX supporter) and so on have already made it clear that HE, as an unrepentant sinner, is welcome and that I deserved that weird reaction from him.

The thing that I find most strange and unsettling is that the image he used was from a post I made back in October 2011 showing a few pics from my wedding (traditional nuptial mass). This means one of two things. 1: He went digging through every post I ever made just to find an image of myself (I don't use a profile pic). or 2: He saved it to his hard drive the very same day I posted it. 1 would definitely be creepy but 2 is just outright frightening. I don't even want to know why he would have any of my images of his hard drive.

God Bless,
Thom

That is the key problem. It's not about gently guiding sinners back to God -- it's about embracing BOLD, UNREPENTANT sinners.

All of us have sinned, but the difference is that we are REPENTANT. We hate our sins; we have been to confession, and we will TRY to not sin again.

If someone wishes to remain a public sinner, choosing their sins over God, then we of the Body of Christ can only remonstrate with and pray for that person -- we can't invite him back in like nothing happened, ignoring the white elephant in the room.

wallflower · « **Reply #84 on:** September 27, 2013, 11:15:10 AM »

Quote from: Meg

Good assessment, St. Magnus, to which I would just add this: Vox mentioned on that thread that the Church is a hospital for sinners. Which is true, I think. But her description of what is meant by this seems to be that, for example, if an obviously very ill person ventures into or near the hospital but refuses to believe that he or she ill and also refuses treatment, that it's perfectly alright and acceptable for that person to stay in the hospital and harass others who try to rightly point out that that person suffers from a serious illness. What is the point of even going to the hospital if one refuses treatment because they don't believe that they are ill? But those on FE who rightly point out that sin is still sin, and that Our Lord told sinners to go and sin no more, are criticized on FE.

What's the point in even being a trad if sin is perfectly acceptable even to the point of being a protected right for a Catholic be able to engage in? That's where the scandal comes in, IMO.

I probably haven't explained it very well, but hopefully others here will get the gist of what I'm saying.

You explained it exceptionally well. That pin points with incredible insight exactly what the issue is. He does not think he is ill, boldly AND subtly tries to spread that illness to others (at least the mentality behind it), and is just having a field day with the ensuing chaos.

As usual I'm finding that cultures of old were right on track with the way they treated this. It has to be straight up quarantined or cut off like the gangrene that it is. There is something about ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity that is truly deeply dangerous. It isn't so much the physical sin but the complete and utter twisting of the mind and soul that goes along with it. Even people who are not tempted by the sin have to twist their minds to it in order to live "in peace" with the unrepentant ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ. If it weren't so horrifying it would almost be fascinating to study the depths human nature will go to to justify itself rather than admit illness. Vox has bought into the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ martyr complex hook, line and sinker and anyone who wants to be there has to abide by it. The bad thing is new people who don't know Impy and all he stands for will automatically defend "attacks" against him. They will have no idea what they are doing or getting into unless they are honest enough to look back.

Meg · « **Reply #85 on:** September 27, 2013, 11:47:32 AM »

Quote from: wallflower

Quote from: Meg
Good assessment, St. Magnus, to which I would just add this: Vox mentioned on that thread that the Church is a hospital for sinners. Which is true, I think. But her description of what is meant by this seems to be that, for example, if an obviously very ill person ventures into or near the hospital but refuses to believe that he or she ill and also refuses treatment, that it's perfectly alright and acceptable for that person to stay in the hospital and harass others who try to rightly point out that that person suffers from a serious illness. What is the point of even going to the hospital if one refuses treatment because they don't believe that they are ill? But those on FE who rightly point out that sin is still sin, and that Our Lord told sinners to go and sin no more, are criticized on FE.

What's the point in even being a trad if sin is perfectly acceptable even to the point of being a protected right for a Catholic be able to engage in? That's where the scandal comes in, IMO.

I probably haven't explained it very well, but hopefully others here will get the gist of what I'm saying.

You explained it exceptionally well. That pin points with incredible insight exactly what the issue is. He does not think he is ill, boldly AND subtly tries to spread that illness to others (at least the mentality behind it), and is just having a field day with the ensuing chaos.

As usual I'm finding that cultures of old were right on track with the way they treated this. It has to be straight up quarantined or cut off like the gangrene that it is. There is something about ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity that is truly deeply dangerous. It isn't so much the physical sin but the complete and utter twisting of the mind and soul that goes along with it. Even people who are not tempted by the sin have to twist their minds to it in order to live "in peace" with the unrepentant ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ. If it weren't so horrifying it would almost be fascinating to study the depths human nature will go to to justify itself rather than admit illness. Vox has bought into the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ martyr complex hook, line and sinker and anyone who wants to be there has to abide by it. The bad thing is new people who don't know Impy and all he stands for will automatically defend "attacks" against him. They will have no idea what they are doing or getting into unless they are honest enough to look back.

Thanks, wallflower. You've raised good points here. I agree with what you've said about the depths to which human nature will go to justify itself rather than admit illness. And yes, Vox has bought into the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ martyr complex hook, line and sinker, and it's sad that everyone who wants to be there has to abide by it.

From what I can tell, Impy has convinced Vox that he is really a woman trapped in a man's body. She keeps bringing up the secret Vatican directive among other things as proof of Impy's condition. So for her, I don't she believes it's a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ problem, but rather it comes down to science, rather than sin. But then there's the revelation of the porn website situation which is gravely sinful despite the denial of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity by Impy. We have seen firsthand in this situation just how disordered ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is, and how manipulative it can be, which is sad for everyone concerned.

I have encouraged her, via email, to seek the advice of the FSSP priest at her parish, and to not leave any of the details out regarding the situation. She may indeed consult with him. I certainly hope so. I can't imagine that an FSSP priest would condone such behavior if he's given a complete picture of the situation.

Charlemagne · « **Reply #86 on:** September 27, 2013, 11:48:11 AM »

The bottom line is that Vox is running an insane asylum - and I think she should be one of the inmates. Call that uncharitable if you must, but she's gone off the deep end.

St Magnus · « **Reply #87 on:** September 27, 2013, 02:25:58 PM »

Quote from: Stubborn

The point is, for the most part FE is a Catholic forum in name only. When you post anything strictly Catholic or against the NO, you quickly find you are a minority at FE and not welcome.

:applause:

Proof

http://catholicforum.fisheaters.com/index.php/topic,3461046.0.html

The thread has been moved to "the Cornfield", so non-members can no longer read it. You should paste a link, yes, but also paste the text here. Trad forums can be very unstable "stores" of information. A thread is here today, gone tomorrow.

BTNYC · « **Reply #88 on:** September 27, 2013, 03:35:50 PM »

Quote from: 2Vermont

I'm just wondering how transgendered folks show that they have converted and repent that they did wrong. Can they even change their sex back?

(I recognize that this may be a really stupid question)

They never "changed" it to begin with. One's sex is immutably, ontologically stamped upon his or her soul.

Everyone understood that implicitly up until very recently. That's why the sodomite agentists (personified at FE by that disgusting malakos-castrato he-whore "Impy / ClareBrigid / Guacamole") have resorted to using the grammatical term "gender" in place of sex. In so doing they have successfully convinced great swathes of people - explicitly or implicitly - that sex is merely a mutable social construct known as "gender."

Short of a miracle, nothing will restore a mutilated generative member, but a truly penitent sodomite would return to dressing, acting and speaking as much like a normal man as possible. This vile pufta, however, has taken to proudly proclaiming himself a heretic to justify his perversion, and deceptively posting under a new name (identified as "female") in order to continue deceiving well-meaning, ignorant souls... and all with the moderator's seal of approval.

Better for them that millstones be hung round their necks...

As I've said before, this FE rot is the natural result of placing women in authority in matters proper to men.

Sancte Pie Quinte, ora pro nobis.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #89 on:** September 27, 2013, 04:39:36 PM »

Quote from: Devekut

I'm the one whose image Impy/Clare/Guacamole stole for his own profile. I made a different user name for this forum, as MorganHiver isn't my real name anyway. The positive response that HE is receiving is absurd. Jayne, Vox, Christulsa (supposedly a staunch SSPX supporter) and so on have already made it clear that HE, as an unrepentant sinner, is welcome and that I deserved that weird reaction from him.

The thing that I find most strange and unsettling is that the image he used was from a post I made back in October 2011 showing a few pics from my wedding (traditional nuptial mass). This means one of two things. 1: He went digging through every post I ever made just to find an image of myself (I don't use a profile pic). or 2: He saved it to his hard drive the very same day I posted it. 1 would definitely be creepy but 2 is just outright frightening. I don't even want to know why he would have any of my images of his hard drive.

God Bless,
Thom

A new low in forum ethics has arrived. So squalid !!!