Author Topic: FE Might Close - Or Jayne Might Become a Moderator There (Read 79008 times)

Meg · « **Reply #325 on:** October 15, 2013, 04:36:13 PM »

Quote from: Devekut

Haha well, I already contacted Mr. Voris in regards to all of this when she setup that challenge to all priests. So, he should be aware of this by now or will soon be, as his inbox is probably flooded.

Do you have a direct email for Michael Voris? I've been emailing the Church Militant TV site, and the emails go through one of his employees. I've requested that he be able to view the info I sent, but have not received any feedback that he's seen my concerns. And his spokesperson seems to have to have been taken in by Vox's view of the situation. Unfortunately.

icterus · « **Reply #326 on:** October 20, 2013, 10:06:51 PM »

Since the transsɛҳuąƖism issue is still ongoing at FE, I thought it was worth posting a question that I hadn't seen posed before.

Concerning the stance that FE has taken on transsɛҳuąƖs and sex-change surgery...

Do you think Vox understands that sex-change surgery does not produce a *functional* individual?

Reading her posts about the subject, I get the distinct feeling that she is imagining a human with a penis and testicles who (with sub secretum Vatican permission) has the penis and testicles removed and somehow is given a functional uterus and ovaries via surgery...resulting in a functional female who is now eligible for marriage to a male.

Or, vice versa, a person who has ovaries and uterus and vagina removed and is given a working penis and testicles that result in a functional male capable of inseminating a female.

This, of course, does not exist on Earth. All that exists are cosmetic surgeries that produce external visual facsimiles - non functional ones. People who undergo these procedures will never be eligible for a Catholic marriage again. No longer able to in fact consummate a marriage, if they were ever able, they are now in a canonical limbo, unable to marry...and so what was the point?

Devekut · « **Reply #327 on:** October 21, 2013, 08:07:04 PM »

Meg,
I don't have his direct contact. It's a shame that even Voris has liberals in his organization. I wonder if he knows.

Ursus · « **Reply #328 on:** October 21, 2013, 09:10:36 PM »

Quote from: icterus

Since the transsɛҳuąƖism issue is still ongoing at FE, I thought it was worth posting a question that I hadn't seen posed before.

Concerning the stance that FE has taken on transsɛҳuąƖs and sex-change surgery...

Do you think Vox understands that sex-change surgery does not produce a *functional* individual?

At this point who cares. Bottom line the tranny who started all that is almost running the place. Commenting, dishing out Catholic "teachings."

Any mention of transgender that's not supportive gets you banned. Devil works his deeds.

How many traditional or people leaning towards that will end up in sin? What a mess.

It should shut down. That was the all the talk last month.

Meg · « **Reply #329 on:** October 22, 2013, 11:32:38 AM »

Quote from: Devekut

Meg,
I don't have his direct contact. It's a shame that even Voris has liberals in his organization. I wonder if he knows.

I got the impression that Voris' employee - who answers the emails - is quite young, and doesn't understand tradition very well. He said that he'd discussed the issue of transgenderism with Vox for several hours on the phone. Sheesh! It may be the case, too, where Vox was very persuasive - even some trads are fooled into thinking that her views on transgenderism can be reconciled with tradition.

I did, however, send the links to Vox's site where she proclaims that she loves drag queens, and which also shows her interest in studying medieval astrology, and using tarot and the I ching. Voris' employee said that he would ask her about this, since he was concerned about it. I haven't heard back since then. I think that Voris is astute enough to know a fake trad when he sees one - but his employee - not so much.