Author Topic: FE Might Close - Or Jayne Might Become a Moderator There (Read 75683 times)

St Magnus · « **on:** September 22, 2013, 12:39:43 PM »

http://catholicforum.fisheaters.com/index.php/topic,3460942.0.html

Unbelievable. Jayne is playing games. 'I don't want to be a mod. I'd be a bad choice. Then again I wouldn't refuse if asked" (paraphrasing)

She's licking her chops at the notion of power to ban trads and suppress the truth about the crisis.

The tranny is back and has publicly denied dogmas and doctrine and proudly accepts the title heretic. All the while promoting sɛҳuąƖ deviance and hurling bible verses at the few Roman Catholics left there.

Vox doesn't get it. She banned a catholic answers charismatic movement promoter that Jayne invited and then reversed the decision. The guy questioned Vox's integrity in a very insulting manner. I'm sure Jayne begged him back.

So there are about 6 of these members, including Jayne and the tranny, who have been emboldened by Vox's protection of them. Any of them can damn a trad to hell or promote modernist-like agendas, but a trad dare not speak to bluntly in a reply to them. The trad will be accuses of being mean, nasty, or worse.

So here she is wanting donations to increase. One one hand the main site is one of, if not the best one stop collection of orthodox Catholic material. But moving to the forum, we are now seeing a trad forum crumble under the weight of a full out assault of the few trads left there by liberals. I suppose we can't blame these neocats for striking while the iron is hot. Vox did open the doors.

Anyhow, this current cry for help from Vox is troubling. She is on a "I want my forum to represent trads in a positive light " kick, but allows Jayne to tell trads they are wrong to display anything but blind obedience to modernist teaching and errors.

Don't dare question the pope's ambiguous statements on FE Trad forum. Not these days. The neocats don't like it.

/rant

Matthew · « **Reply #1 on:** September 22, 2013, 12:47:40 PM »

Sounds like the new SSPX.

Anyone who supports the neo-SSPX should have no problem with Fisheaters.

Vox has always been all about giving a "good impression about Trads" to the newbies, even as far back as 2006. I don't think she'd even disagree with that.

Which sounds good and all, but what about doctrine? What about morality? What about dangers to the Faith? One can go too far in censoring the "controversial" stuff, to the point that the very truth and important topics are squelched.

Thank you for posting a link -- so much better than just posting an assertion without any basis or proof.

Because from now on, I want to see PROOF or at least something CONCRETE like QUOTES when anything is alleged about another individual or forum.

CathInfo is not a rumor mill, or an axe grinding forum. It's also not a drama queen whoring for attention in some kind of "forum soap opera".

If someone comes on here and says that Fr. Rostand is against the Resistance, I'm going to have to ask for proof (which shouldn't be a problem of course!)

:wink:

2Vermont · « **Reply #2 on:** September 22, 2013, 12:50:53 PM »

I saw all of that. Vox just can't stand the "nastiness" anymore. The posters over there (including myself who was banned for "general rudeness") are not nasty by and large.

St Magnus · « **Reply #3 on:** September 22, 2013, 12:55:15 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

Sounds like the new SSPX.

Anyone who supports the neo-SSPX should have no problem with Fisheaters.

Vox has always been all about giving a "good impression about Trads" to the newbies, even as far back as 2006. I don't think she'd even disagree with that.

Which sounds good and all, but what about doctrine? What about morality? What about dangers to the Faith? One can go too far in censoring the "controversial" stuff, to the point that the very truth and important topics are squelched.

Thank you for posting a link -- so much better than just posting an assertion without any basis or proof.

Because from now on, I want to see PROOF and QUOTES about anything alleged about another individual or forum.

CathInfo is not a rumor mill, or an axe grinding forum. It's also not a drama queen whoring for attention in some kind of "forum soap opera".

If someone comes on here and says that Fr. Rostand is against the Resistance, I'm going to have to ask for proof (which shouldn't be a problem of course!)

:wink:

Fair enough.

And thanks for being a level headed owner of a trad forum. Seems to be a shortage of such imo.

Mithrandylan · « **Reply #4 on:** September 22, 2013, 12:56:10 PM »

We should pray a novena that it does. Seriously. People will say that the main site (not the forum) the site is 'invaluable' but all the information on the FE main site can be found elsewhere, the only benefit is that it is well-organized. So if the main site goes with the forum, so be it. That place is a living, breathing scandal. It only reinforces the modernist tendencies and neo-Catholic sentiments that exist among so many self described 'traditional' Catholics.