I don't get "agender". If you are neither male nor female, what the lunatic crap are you? A picnic table? Windex?
That's why I said I think many of them are redundant.
What the heck is the difference between "agender" and "neutrois" and "third gender"?
And what the ____ is a third gender? Even with my considerable imagination, I haven't been able to imagine what a third gender might look like. I keep coming back to basic male or female, or some combination thereof.
I think this is intentional obfuscation and chaff to confuse us on purpose, in order to get us to submit to their sodomite agenda -- to corrupt our nation and culture.
Because there isn't any difference between "bisexual" and "gender fluid". It all comes down to who you wish/are willing to commit sins of impurity with.
I still think it's as simple as we thought it was in the eighties:
straight people (male, female)
homos (men = gays, female = lesbians)
bisexuals (will have sex with anything on 2 feet)
And while some men and women simply "aren't interested in sex" they are still simply male or female.
Of course, back a bit further, anyone who wasn't normal (a man desiring women, or a woman desiring men) was considered MENTALLY ILL, NOT WELL, and/or a SEXUAL PERVERT. That is really what many people are today: a pervert.
Various forms of self-abuse, and other sins that were listed in the Bible as abominations that the pagans were guilty of (sodomy, bestiality, incest, etc.)
What, is there going to be a new sexual orientation for computer programmers? A JavaSexual? Or maybe Cybersexual? How is a computer programmer's sex different in any substantial way from that of a regular man?
It's just stupid. Factoring in level of desire, frequency, occupation, clothing style, etc. into one's basic sexuality is getting too specific. You're still a man or woman, gay/straight/bisexual.