This.
The problem is, none of us have worked at an agency that puts up these "satellites". Verification of the truth is impossible for most of us.
So I prefer to focus on other data points that CAN be reasoned out, experimented, experienced, etc. If all of these point to Flat Earth, then the satellites being "unknown" or "undetermined" does nothing.
Have you ever done a crossword puzzle? You don't get caught spending hours on "9 down" -- you move on to the easier problems; maybe some of the letters you fill in will help you with 9 down -- you come back to it later.
And no, there is no serious evidence for "space satellites". Everyone who claims to have evidence that space-satellites exist have a vested interest in the deception, they are liars, and untrustworthy. I would be foolish to trust them.
Mr. "It looks so fake, it has to be real" Elon Musk included. Satanic symbol on his shirt (and the Tesla logo itself) included.
Further, if you think about WHY satellites are sent up to “space”, it all points to LEO satellites and not “space” ones.
What do the movies tells us about satellites? They are used for taking pictures of earth, tracking terrorists, cars, and even zooming in on people walking on the sidewalk (with enough zoom power to read time on a wristwatch). The tech is there for a LEO satellite only 1-3 miles in the air. There is NO WAY that a satellite in space (300-400 miles away) is taking photos of a car. That’s fantasy.
Secondly, the same thing applies with missle tracking, GPS, weapons, satellite radio, satellite internet, etc. This stuff is NOT be transmitted 300-400 miles from space. No, it’s using LEO satellites from a mile or so.
What’s the most common light fixture today? LED. Those are probably used on satellites. LED range of sight is around a few miles. Not 300+.
The ISS is said to be 250 miles above earth. I just don’t buy that.