[Dellery]

 ^ Thank you as well S.S.

PereJoseph hit the nail so squarely on page three that in my opinion it justifies a re-post.

Oh, please, this woman is an unrepentant public mortal sinner who proudly identifies herself with some of the worst scandalous revolutionary women (Simone Weil). She is no friend of Tradition, despite some of the materials on her website. She has been actively pursuing the destruction of the Faith for several years now and is too proud to restrain herself. She's a disgusting person with evil fruits. When somebody is publicly harming the Faith, Christians are obliged to combat that person's errors, even by attacking that person's credibility through assaults on her person. It is false charity to suggest that we are obliged to assume she has good motives for publicly defending her sin and her insane ideological attacks on the purity of the Faith and of Catholic morals and culture. We are only obliged to assume good motives until we have a probable reason to conclude otherwise. We are well past that point with her. Like most ferocious old damaged feminist shrews, she deals in self-righteous psychological manipulation and self-centered indulgence in observations that are mere products of her own twisted desires. That evil forum needs to be shut down and she needs to make public reparation for her public crimes.

[Graham]

Gentlemen:  I, too, have been banned from FE apparently for a lack of respect due to the illustrious NO Brahmin...

...in fact, seeing this thread,  I could not resist to share with you - as many of you here seem like-minded in this matter - a special variant nickname I created for that aformentioned Brahmin:  I call him Scryptorium, especially Scrypto for short!  Thought you guys might appreciate that.

But nevermind me... carry on, gentlemen!

Could you link to the thread where this all took place, or perhaps quote Scriptorium?

Bump.

[Dellery]

 I'm not sure if this all took place in the same thread or not. I would post the encounter I had with him, but can't view the site or get the link because I'm banned, and I'd rather let his words speak for himself. It was in a semi-recent thread about ++ Muller. I will say though, it was the first time I've ever heard a supposed trad relate something to the supposed inability to take back a supposed "karmic wave".

[tmw89]

Yes, I'm with SpiritusSanctus, glad you're here tmw.

Thanks, Stubborn.  I remember you were always one of the more sensible ones on FE.

Gentlemen:  I, too, have been banned from FE apparently for a lack of respect due to the illustrious NO Brahmin...

...in fact, seeing this thread,  I could not resist to share with you - as many of you here seem like-minded in this matter - a special variant nickname I created for that aformentioned Brahmin:  I call him Scryptorium, especially Scrypto for short!  Thought you guys might appreciate that.

But nevermind me... carry on, gentlemen!

Could you link to the thread where this all took place, or perhaps quote Scriptorium?

As a result of the ban, I can no longer browse the forum.  However, if you take a look at my post history, Scrypto's post history, and make note of the flavor of the FE waters (or Kool Aid?) you will understand.

Gentlemen:  I, too, have been banned from FE apparently for a lack of respect due to the illustrious NO Brahmin...

...in fact, seeing this thread,  I could not resist to share with you - as many of you here seem like-minded in this matter - a special variant nickname I created for that aformentioned Brahmin:  I call him Scryptorium, especially Scrypto for short!  Thought you guys might appreciate that.

But nevermind me... carry on, gentlemen!

Could you link to the thread where this all took place, or perhaps quote Scriptorium?

Bump.

No worries, if you or anyone else ask me a question I'll (eventually) get back to you.

I'm not sure if this all took place in the same thread or not. I would post the encounter I had with him, but can't view the site or get the link because I'm banned, and I'd rather let his words speak for himself. It was in a semi-recent thread about ++ Muller. I will say though, it was the first time I've ever heard a supposed trad relate something to the supposed inability to take back a supposed "karmic wave".

Thank you for the benefit of the doubt.  I had responded to multiple threads by Scrypto, but the Mueller thread might have been the most controversial.  Already I can't recall what you're referencing RE a "karmic wave" - probably because this happened before Christmas, and since then a not so insignificant number of developments have piled up!

[Dellery]

Already I can't recall what you're referencing RE a "karmic wave" - probably because this happened before Christmas, and since then a not so insignificant number of developments have piled up!

 Yeah, it happened about a few days before Christmas or so. Are you at liberty to speak of aforementioned developments? With Gerard being banned as well, it sounds like quite the purge happened.  

[Dellery]

Already I can't recall what you're referencing RE a "karmic wave" - probably because this happened before Christmas, and since then a not so insignificant number of developments have piled up!

 
Yeah, it happened about a few days before Christmas or so, Vox Clamantis probably deleted it anyway. Are you at liberty to speak of the aforementioned developments? With Gerard being banned as well, it sounds like quite the purge happened.  

[Jonah]

With Gerard being banned as well, it sounds like quite the purge happened.

Has Gerard been banned from FE? He was probably the best post over there, imho. Someone who has contact with him should invite him to post here.

[Elizabeth]

With Gerard being banned as well, it sounds like quite the purge happened.

Has Gerard been banned from FE? He was probably the best post over there, imho. Someone who has contact with him should invite him to post here.

I liked Gerard very well, also.  Have not looked in over at FE for a very long time.

I skimmed over about 15 pages of that thread.  Disgusting, absolutely disgusting, and very poorly moderated.

[Stubborn]

To a certain extent, I think Vox is doing trads a favor by banning them. I mean, those trads who do their best to live the true faith without compromise will soon find themselves needing to compromise in order to fit in over there.
If you don't compromise, your time will be spent arguing even the most fundamental and basic truths as was taught in 1st grade catechism. . . . . . . . . which though almost completely forgotten / denied within the forum, she has posted on their main site.

[TraditionalistThomas]

I hope INPEFESS moves over to Suscipe Domine. Not much left on Fish-Eaters for him, unless he can be bothered tackling Novus Ordo mental gymnastics in the Theology and Philosophy subforum.

[Elizabeth]

To a certain extent, I think Vox is doing trads a favor by banning them. I mean, those trads who do their best to live the true faith without compromise will soon find themselves needing to compromise in order to fit in over there.

I get what you mean, but in case her members believe her to be sort of an authority, no favors for their immortal souls! And some of the photos should never have been published on a Catholic forum.

[Dellery]

With Gerard being banned as well, it sounds like quite the purge happened.

Has Gerard been banned from FE? He was probably the best post over there, imho. Someone who has contact with him should invite him to post here.

 I read he was banned from the Suscipe Domine forums, Apparently 'Vox Clamantis' left some kind of title calling him snarky under his username - totally disrespectful, and completely out of line considering the great contribution he was to that forum. I certainly hope to see him around as well.  

[tmw89]

Are you at liberty to speak of the aforementioned developments? With Gerard being banned as well, it sounds like quite the purge happened.  

Sorry to disappoint, Dellery - I reference only the wonderful madness of the three-day Christmas festivities (24th, 25th, 26th) that I experienced in-between!  That Vox Clamantis has banned Gerard is only indicative of how far off the deep end she has plunged.

A little birdie has told me since my ban that apparently JayneK - ever the innocent little cryptoid! - is misrepresenting me on somebody else's farewell thread, saying I went out thinking I was defending the Faith from heretics.  Banned as I am, I cannot respond (she has done this before, attacking Vetus after his ban IIRC.)  Lest any of you good folks on CI not wander over to SD to see what I wrote for yourselves, this is it:

The best part is that I was banned after a nearly three month absence for one day of snark.  Snark primarily against the modernist shill, Scriptorium - whose heretical NO nonsense masquerading as "Catholic" thought should be enough to make anyone with a decent Sensus Catholicus vomit a little into their mouth.  But taken in a broader context... in the fifteen months preceding the ban, I paid up a monthly subscription fee in the first twelve months.  As I went on a kind of hiatus following the (temporary) bans of several of my friends there in late September, I suppose I happened to make that fatal mistake of neglecting to pay up for protection.  And for what?  Playing on the absurdity of Scriptorium's posts?  Making the "Would this or that canonization make you go sede" poll in the Cornfield, which the site ownership has claimed is not even a "real" part of the forum?  I should think a year's worth of donations (totaling almost $150), three years of membership AND linking people to Amazon with the FE URL code (who knows how much that profited the owner) would count for something against a day of snark - twelve posts, if I recall correctly.  God love a certain physician from Mumbai who posts there   but the man literally told another user in graphic detail to snuff himself out and he is still on FE.  That incident has since been purged from the Cornfield, for good reason, but for those of us who recall the incident it illustrates an awful double-standard - as this poster happens to fall in the sedeplenist line, snarks accordingly, he is permitted.  But wo to the sedes!  As if sedevacantist Catholics are lepers...

Searching my words, I can't come up with any triumphalist beatin'-the-heretics-type of talk, but maybe I'm missing something because I lack all those advanced degrees JayneK says she has.  Then again, misrepresentation has always been a part of her MO...

All I see is the foolish mistake of donating 150ish dollars to someone who I have since discovered is not friendly to Catholic Tradition (to say the least) - a mistake I intend to confess to be on the safe side, and certainly endeavor to never repeat!

[Stubborn]

Searching my words, I can't come up with any triumphalist beatin'-the-heretics-type of talk, but maybe I'm missing something because I lack all those advanced degrees JayneK says she has.  Then again, misrepresentation has always been a part of her MO...

All I see is the foolish mistake of donating 150ish dollars to someone who I have since discovered is not friendly to Catholic Tradition (to say the least) - a mistake I intend to confess to be on the safe side, and certainly endeavor to never repeat!

Hey, don't feel bad - I gave $10 once myself when I thought it was justified because fighting the good fight amongst the NOers there was a good reason to keep FE from closing. I hate to admit that now, but it's true. That place has the propensity to suck in - and keep in - almost everyone who happens across that place.

As far as you missing those advanced degrees are concerned, thank your lucky stars that Our Lord kept you away from getting such an advanced education - else you too could have been indoctrinated to the core in modernism. Your posts are not mingled with a confused theology like theirs - so be glad, not regretful!

Have no regrets my friend! I understand there is another trad forum, SD - I hope it blossoms and keeps the true faith as primary like CI does!

[ServusSpiritusSancti]

FishEaters is the sorriest excuse for a "trad" forum I have ever seen. I can't believe she purges Traditional Catholics rather than the liberals who actually need it yet dares to call herself a Trad.

Edit: I tried logging in to my acconut on FE for the first time in several months, and it said I was banned. I haven't made a post there since August or September, so Vox could not have banned me for any posts I made on FE, because I was able to log into my account in October just fine. There are only two reasons I can think of as to why Vox banned me:

1- She read my posts on here and decided to "purge" me along with the other Trads on FE for being "too Traditional".

2- She noticed that I was asking about "CollegeCatholic's" new forum in the FE chatroom the other night and assumed I joined, so she banned me for joining.

Either way, a badge of honor, I say.