[MaterDominici]

In case you missed Matthew's 2 cents from another thread:

That's why I think "fαɢɢօt" is a surprisingly appropriate term for sodomites.

Because they are just waiting to be thrown in the fire (when death comes).

While it could be argued that "gαy" is concise and does the trick (refer to my posts where I prefer "Black" to refer to those of African descent), it also means "happy" and that is misleading.

ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ is nice and scientific, I suppose. But it doesn't carry with it any implication that there is something wrong with them.

Sodomite certainly implies that something is morally wrong with their behavior.

Queer works well, because their inclinations are against nature.

[Sigismund]

I thumbed it down because we don't need to be enforcing PC speech codes that forbid derogatory language towards men who are like "wild beasts"

I understand, but it isn't about being PC.

Look, I agree completely with the Church about ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity, and every other aspect of its moral teaching on sɛҳuąƖ matters.  I also believer that, as St. Francis de Sales said, you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.  Out principal concern should be converting sinners, all of them, Of whom I am the first.  Language like this will not convert anyone.  

[Sigismund]

In case you missed Matthew's 2 cents from another thread:

That's why I think "fαɢɢօt" is a surprisingly appropriate term for sodomites.

Because they are just waiting to be thrown in the fire (when death comes).

While it could be argued that "gαy" is concise and does the trick (refer to my posts where I prefer "Black" to refer to those of African descent), it also means "happy" and that is misleading.

ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ is nice and scientific, I suppose. But it doesn't carry with it any implication that there is something wrong with them.

Sodomite certainly implies that something is morally wrong with their behavior.

Queer works well, because their inclinations are against nature.

I did see it, and I think he is wrong too, for the reason stated above.

[Kaesekopf]

Intriguing.

From Vox:
That isn't an actual example, but it's the sort of thing I'm talking about. I see that and want to throttle someone. I seriously do. It's more personally infuriating now that ad money is all I have to live on, too. "Gee, THANKS, pal!" is what I think when I see that sort of thing. Man, it makes me mad. "Yeah, we're gonna sell traditional Catholicism like THAT, ya idiot!" "Nevermind me; I don't need to eat!" Grrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://catholicforum.fisheaters.com/index.php/topic,3454922.msg33828472.html#msg33828472

[Graham]

How many politically correct SWPL types are there interested in Catholicism? Maybe there are some attracted by the smells and bells. As I've said before, for every one of those, there's someone else who's put off Catholicism by uptight political correctness.