[Dellery]

Jayne -- still waiting for an answer to: "Do you believe it is ok for a Protestant to publicly share his opinions on the Church, and attack your fellow Catholics on a Catholic forum?" if you are unable to answer just say so, offering up acts of humility is a commendable practice.

[Jaynek]

Jayne -- still waiting for an answer to: "Do you believe it is ok for a Protestant to publicly share his opinions on the Church, and attack your fellow Catholics on a Catholic forum?" if you are unable to answer just say so, offering up acts of humility is a commendable practice.

I answered.  Since you do not recognize my answer as an answer, I have concluded that we do not communicate well enough to have a discussion.

[Dellery]

Jayne -- still waiting for an answer to: "Do you believe it is ok for a Protestant to publicly share his opinions on the Church, and attack your fellow Catholics on a Catholic forum?" if you are unable to answer just say so, offering up acts of humility is a commendable practice.

I answered.  Since you do not recognize my answer as an answer, I have concluded that we do not communicate well enough to have a discussion.

Perhaps I am missing something, and since you're a lady, I'm assuming it's me who has the problem communicating.
JayneK Said:

On that forum people may share opinions on the Church within certain limits, regardless of their religion. The moderators determined that he was within those limits. I do not think that any forum posts should be personal attacks, regardless of the religions involved. As I recall, the posts in question were not personal attacks.

For clarification, because quite frankly it would seem my memory has failed me, could you please show me where I asked the following; What are the rules of SD? what determination did the mods make concerning Vetus Ordo's replies to SSS? what you think consists of a personal attack? and what you recall?
For the life of me, I can only remember asking: "Do you believe it is ok for a Protestant to publicly share his opinions on the Church, and attack your fellow Catholics on a Catholic forum?"

[Rosarium]

I was not banned. My account was deleted at my request.

Rosarium is a "conciliarist", or as most of us would say, modernist.
He was crazily talking about licensing his posts before she gave him the axe.

No, this is misrepresenting what took place.

The issue had multiple facets, but the final issues were the lack of ability to edit posts and the word filter which (without notification) changed certain words to "ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ".

The licensing my posts example was not a serious attempt to license my posts, but an effort to make a point, a point which was tangential to the topic.

I am not a modernist. That is a grave error and a defined heresy. It is not something to be tossed around lightly. Libel is hardly holy.

Unless you are holding me to actual teachings of the Church, rather than your opinions, you should retract such statements.

Ah, sorry. I didn't know Rosarium was a conciliarist.

FWIW, modernists wouldn't be so successful if it was easy to immediately see their errors.

Or, you can be paranoid and see errors everywhere, without actually being able to show them. It is easy to find errors if they are evident.

I am Catholic and follow the teachings of the Church, which are timeless. If I hold error, I am ready for correction, but those errors must be held by me, not imagined by somebody posting about people they do not know.

I know many object to my personality, and it is not something which is beneficial for my person to stand in the way of what matters, but accusations of heresy must be made with some grounding rather than one's imagination.

[Dellery]

I was not banned. My account was deleted at my request.

Rosarium is a "conciliarist", or as most of us would say, modernist.
He was crazily talking about licensing his posts before she gave him the axe.

No, this is misrepresenting what took place.

The issue had multiple facets, but the final issues were the lack of ability to edit posts and the word filter which (without notification) changed certain words to "ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ".

The licensing my posts example was not a serious attempt to license my posts, but an effort to make a point, a point which was tangential to the topic.

I am not a modernist. That is a grave error and a defined heresy. It is not something to be tossed around lightly. Libel is hardly holy.

Unless you are holding me to actual teachings of the Church, rather than your opinions, you should retract such statements.

Ah, sorry. I didn't know Rosarium was a conciliarist.

FWIW, modernists wouldn't be so successful if it was easy to immediately see their errors.

Or, you can be paranoid and see errors everywhere, without actually being able to show them. It is easy to find errors if they are evident.

I am Catholic and follow the teachings of the Church, which are timeless. If I hold error, I am ready for correction, but those errors must be held by me, not imagined by somebody posting about people they do not know.

I know many object to my personality, and it is not something which is beneficial for my person to stand in the way of what matters, but accusations of heresy must be made with some grounding rather than one's imagination.

Don't you attend the indult?