[Jaynek]

I don't respect the fact that a Protestant was allowed to smear Traditional Catholicism.

It's not that I don't respect the authority of SD's moderators. I don't respect the actions they took.

You interpreted events as a Protestant smearing traditional Catholicism.  That is not what I saw and that is not what the moderators saw.  Since they are the moderators, their judgment trumps yours.

The Admin stated he thought Vetus was attacking the "sedevacantist thesis", using your faulty and subjective reasoning, the admin trumps the mods and therefore it's safe to say Vetus Ordo attacked sedevacantism.
Do you believe it is ok for a Protestant to publicly share his opinions on the Church, and attack your fellow Catholics on a Catholic forum?

I thought his comments about Sedevacantism were accurate.  

Would you mind answering the question posed to you in bold?

On that forum people may share opinions on the Church within certain limits, regardless of their religion. The moderators determined that he was within those limits. I do not think that any forum posts should be personal attacks, regardless of the religions involved. As I recall, the posts in question were not personal attacks.

[ServusSpiritusSancti]

I do not think that any forum posts should be personal attacks, regardless of the religions involved. As I recall, the posts in question were not personal attacks.

Vetus accusing me of "heresy" was not a personal attack?

[Dellery]

I don't respect the fact that a Protestant was allowed to smear Traditional Catholicism.

It's not that I don't respect the authority of SD's moderators. I don't respect the actions they took.

You interpreted events as a Protestant smearing traditional Catholicism.  That is not what I saw and that is not what the moderators saw.  Since they are the moderators, their judgment trumps yours.

The Admin stated he thought Vetus was attacking the "sedevacantist thesis", using your faulty and subjective reasoning, the admin trumps the mods and therefore it's safe to say Vetus Ordo attacked sedevacantism.
Do you believe it is ok for a Protestant to publicly share his opinions on the Church, and attack your fellow Catholics on a Catholic forum?

I thought his comments about Sedevacantism were accurate.  

Would you mind answering the question posed to you in bold?

On that forum people may share opinions on the Church within certain limits, regardless of their religion. The moderators determined that he was within those limits. I do not think that any forum posts should be personal attacks, regardless of the religions involved. As I recall, the posts in question were not personal attacks.

Thank you for sharing all of these arbitrary factoids and opinions with me, but if you don't mind, I'd still appreciate an answer to the aforementioned question.

[Jaynek]

I do not think that any forum posts should be personal attacks, regardless of the religions involved. As I recall, the posts in question were not personal attacks.

Vetus accusing me of "heresy" was not a personal attack?

A personal attack would be something like telling you that you are stupid and whiney. It is about personal qualities.  To describe a person`s ideas as heretical is not a personal attack.  It is discussing ideas.  

I do not remember the details of the discussion and I do not care enough about it to look it up.  

[ServusSpiritusSancti]

Calling someone a heretic without proof is a serious error, Jaynek.

Vetus is guilty of heresy because he's a Protestant, and all Protestants are heretics. But you can't accuse a Catholic of heresy without proof. You should not have defended a Protestant over a Catholic.