[Jaynek]

I don't respect the fact that a Protestant was allowed to smear Traditional Catholicism.

It's not that I don't respect the authority of SD's moderators. I don't respect the actions they took.

You interpreted events as a Protestant smearing traditional Catholicism.  That is not what I saw and that is not what the moderators saw.  Since they are the moderators, their judgment trumps yours.

[Dellery]

I don't respect the fact that a Protestant was allowed to smear Traditional Catholicism.

It's not that I don't respect the authority of SD's moderators. I don't respect the actions they took.

You interpreted events as a Protestant smearing traditional Catholicism.  That is not what I saw and that is not what the moderators saw.  Since they are the moderators, their judgment trumps yours.

The Admin stated he thought Vetus was attacking the "sedevacantist thesis", using your faulty and subjective reasoning, the admin trumps the mods and therefore it's safe to say Vetus Ordo attacked sedevacantism.
Do you believe it is ok for a Protestant to publicly share his opinions on the Church, and attack your fellow Catholics on a Catholic forum?

[Jaynek]

I don't respect the fact that a Protestant was allowed to smear Traditional Catholicism.

It's not that I don't respect the authority of SD's moderators. I don't respect the actions they took.

You interpreted events as a Protestant smearing traditional Catholicism.  That is not what I saw and that is not what the moderators saw.  Since they are the moderators, their judgment trumps yours.

The Admin stated he thought Vetus was attacking the "sedevacantist thesis", using your faulty and subjective reasoning, the admin trumps the mods and therefore it's safe to say Vetus Ordo attacked sedevacantism.
Do you believe it is ok for a Protestant to publicly share his opinions on the Church, and attack your fellow Catholics on a Catholic forum?

I thought his comments about Sedevacantism were accurate.  

[Dellery]

I don't respect the fact that a Protestant was allowed to smear Traditional Catholicism.

It's not that I don't respect the authority of SD's moderators. I don't respect the actions they took.

You interpreted events as a Protestant smearing traditional Catholicism.  That is not what I saw and that is not what the moderators saw.  Since they are the moderators, their judgment trumps yours.

The Admin stated he thought Vetus was attacking the "sedevacantist thesis", using your faulty and subjective reasoning, the admin trumps the mods and therefore it's safe to say Vetus Ordo attacked sedevacantism.
Do you believe it is ok for a Protestant to publicly share his opinions on the Church, and attack your fellow Catholics on a Catholic forum?

I thought his comments about Sedevacantism were accurate.  

Would you mind answering the question posed to you in bold?

[ServusSpiritusSancti]

I don't respect the fact that a Protestant was allowed to smear Traditional Catholicism.

It's not that I don't respect the authority of SD's moderators. I don't respect the actions they took.

You interpreted events as a Protestant smearing traditional Catholicism.  That is not what I saw and that is not what the moderators saw.  Since they are the moderators, their judgment trumps yours.

No, you need to understand that just because someone holds a higher authority, it does not mean their judgement automatically trumps someone else's.

If they told you that it's ok to go into a ѕуηαgσgυє and pray with Jews (heresy!), would you tell them they're wrong, or would you "respect their authority" and consider their judgement to trump yours?

I thought his comments about Sedevacantism were accurate.

Sedevacantism was not even being discussed on the thread. Furthermore, Vetus takes issue with both the sedevacantist position and the SSPX (sedeplenist) position. He thinks Traditional Catholicism itself is illogical.