[Jaynek]

If having me be a member of a forum means it is a bad forum, you will have to apply that to CI as well.  

[Jaynek]

JayneK is a sanctimonious pain in the behind. Is there a word that exists in the English lanugage that is of a higher degree to describe her, eh, sanctimony?

Thesaurus entry

That is fair enough.  There is however no basis for calling me a crypto-Jew, as some have.

[ServusSpiritusSancti]

If having me be a member of a forum means it is a bad forum, you will have to apply that to CI as well.

I didn't say SD was a bad forum because you're a member there.

I thought your admonishment of me was rude, especially considering the fact that you chose to take the side of a Protestant over a Traditional Catholic.

[Jaynek]

If having me be a member of a forum means it is a bad forum, you will have to apply that to CI as well.

I didn't say SD was a bad forum because you're a member there.

I thought your admonishment of me was rude, especially considering the fact that you chose to take the side of a Protestant over a Traditional Catholic.

I chose to take the side of a moderator over a person who did not respect his authority.  Respecting moderators is a thing I have.  If I noticed somebody dissing Matthew here I would probably do the same thing.

Then again, Matthew is older and more established in being a moderator.  I would not have the same sense that he needed my support, so I might not.  At any rate, it would bother me to see someone disrespecting Matthew or any other moderator.  That is just how I am.

[ServusSpiritusSancti]

I don't respect the fact that a Protestant was allowed to smear Traditional Catholicism.

It's not that I don't respect the authority of SD's moderators. I don't respect the actions they took.

[Jaynek]

I don't respect the fact that a Protestant was allowed to smear Traditional Catholicism.

It's not that I don't respect the authority of SD's moderators. I don't respect the actions they took.

You interpreted events as a Protestant smearing traditional Catholicism.  That is not what I saw and that is not what the moderators saw.  Since they are the moderators, their judgment trumps yours.

[Dellery]

I don't respect the fact that a Protestant was allowed to smear Traditional Catholicism.

It's not that I don't respect the authority of SD's moderators. I don't respect the actions they took.

You interpreted events as a Protestant smearing traditional Catholicism.  That is not what I saw and that is not what the moderators saw.  Since they are the moderators, their judgment trumps yours.

The Admin stated he thought Vetus was attacking the "sedevacantist thesis", using your faulty and subjective reasoning, the admin trumps the mods and therefore it's safe to say Vetus Ordo attacked sedevacantism.
Do you believe it is ok for a Protestant to publicly share his opinions on the Church, and attack your fellow Catholics on a Catholic forum?

[Jaynek]

I don't respect the fact that a Protestant was allowed to smear Traditional Catholicism.

It's not that I don't respect the authority of SD's moderators. I don't respect the actions they took.

You interpreted events as a Protestant smearing traditional Catholicism.  That is not what I saw and that is not what the moderators saw.  Since they are the moderators, their judgment trumps yours.

The Admin stated he thought Vetus was attacking the "sedevacantist thesis", using your faulty and subjective reasoning, the admin trumps the mods and therefore it's safe to say Vetus Ordo attacked sedevacantism.
Do you believe it is ok for a Protestant to publicly share his opinions on the Church, and attack your fellow Catholics on a Catholic forum?

I thought his comments about Sedevacantism were accurate.  

[Dellery]

I don't respect the fact that a Protestant was allowed to smear Traditional Catholicism.

It's not that I don't respect the authority of SD's moderators. I don't respect the actions they took.

You interpreted events as a Protestant smearing traditional Catholicism.  That is not what I saw and that is not what the moderators saw.  Since they are the moderators, their judgment trumps yours.

The Admin stated he thought Vetus was attacking the "sedevacantist thesis", using your faulty and subjective reasoning, the admin trumps the mods and therefore it's safe to say Vetus Ordo attacked sedevacantism.
Do you believe it is ok for a Protestant to publicly share his opinions on the Church, and attack your fellow Catholics on a Catholic forum?

I thought his comments about Sedevacantism were accurate.  

Would you mind answering the question posed to you in bold?

[ServusSpiritusSancti]

I don't respect the fact that a Protestant was allowed to smear Traditional Catholicism.

It's not that I don't respect the authority of SD's moderators. I don't respect the actions they took.

You interpreted events as a Protestant smearing traditional Catholicism.  That is not what I saw and that is not what the moderators saw.  Since they are the moderators, their judgment trumps yours.

No, you need to understand that just because someone holds a higher authority, it does not mean their judgement automatically trumps someone else's.

If they told you that it's ok to go into a ѕуηαgσgυє and pray with Jews (heresy!), would you tell them they're wrong, or would you "respect their authority" and consider their judgement to trump yours?

I thought his comments about Sedevacantism were accurate.

Sedevacantism was not even being discussed on the thread. Furthermore, Vetus takes issue with both the sedevacantist position and the SSPX (sedeplenist) position. He thinks Traditional Catholicism itself is illogical.

[Jaynek]

I don't respect the fact that a Protestant was allowed to smear Traditional Catholicism.

It's not that I don't respect the authority of SD's moderators. I don't respect the actions they took.

You interpreted events as a Protestant smearing traditional Catholicism.  That is not what I saw and that is not what the moderators saw.  Since they are the moderators, their judgment trumps yours.

The Admin stated he thought Vetus was attacking the "sedevacantist thesis", using your faulty and subjective reasoning, the admin trumps the mods and therefore it's safe to say Vetus Ordo attacked sedevacantism.
Do you believe it is ok for a Protestant to publicly share his opinions on the Church, and attack your fellow Catholics on a Catholic forum?

I thought his comments about Sedevacantism were accurate.  

Would you mind answering the question posed to you in bold?

On that forum people may share opinions on the Church within certain limits, regardless of their religion. The moderators determined that he was within those limits. I do not think that any forum posts should be personal attacks, regardless of the religions involved. As I recall, the posts in question were not personal attacks.

[ServusSpiritusSancti]

I do not think that any forum posts should be personal attacks, regardless of the religions involved. As I recall, the posts in question were not personal attacks.

Vetus accusing me of "heresy" was not a personal attack?

[Dellery]

I don't respect the fact that a Protestant was allowed to smear Traditional Catholicism.

It's not that I don't respect the authority of SD's moderators. I don't respect the actions they took.

You interpreted events as a Protestant smearing traditional Catholicism.  That is not what I saw and that is not what the moderators saw.  Since they are the moderators, their judgment trumps yours.

The Admin stated he thought Vetus was attacking the "sedevacantist thesis", using your faulty and subjective reasoning, the admin trumps the mods and therefore it's safe to say Vetus Ordo attacked sedevacantism.
Do you believe it is ok for a Protestant to publicly share his opinions on the Church, and attack your fellow Catholics on a Catholic forum?

I thought his comments about Sedevacantism were accurate.  

Would you mind answering the question posed to you in bold?

On that forum people may share opinions on the Church within certain limits, regardless of their religion. The moderators determined that he was within those limits. I do not think that any forum posts should be personal attacks, regardless of the religions involved. As I recall, the posts in question were not personal attacks.

Thank you for sharing all of these arbitrary factoids and opinions with me, but if you don't mind, I'd still appreciate an answer to the aforementioned question.

[Jaynek]

I do not think that any forum posts should be personal attacks, regardless of the religions involved. As I recall, the posts in question were not personal attacks.

Vetus accusing me of "heresy" was not a personal attack?

A personal attack would be something like telling you that you are stupid and whiney. It is about personal qualities.  To describe a person`s ideas as heretical is not a personal attack.  It is discussing ideas.  

I do not remember the details of the discussion and I do not care enough about it to look it up.  

[ServusSpiritusSancti]

Calling someone a heretic without proof is a serious error, Jaynek.

Vetus is guilty of heresy because he's a Protestant, and all Protestants are heretics. But you can't accuse a Catholic of heresy without proof. You should not have defended a Protestant over a Catholic.