Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: A Catholic eyeblink comparison of AIs  (Read 6214 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
A Catholic eyeblink comparison of AIs
« on: October 05, 2025, 06:18:19 PM »
In the last week I have posed controversial, even argumentative, questions to (((Google's))) AI, Adobe's AI, and Musk's Grok.

Google's AI, as I have commented before, engages in all the stereotypically Jєωιѕн name-calling, logical fallacies, biased sources, and eventually flees the evidence provided. It truly behaves with the personality of a тαℓмυdic rabbi.

Adobe's AI is quick to refuse to discuss or summarize topics, but can be goaded into the tasks.

Musk's Grok immediately sets to the requested task and does not hesitate to address and even sympathize with some "antisemitic" points.

I am considering subscribing to Grok4, the higher powered $30/month version.

Offline AnthonyPadua

  • Supporter
Re: A Catholic eyeblink comparison of AIs
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2025, 07:46:58 AM »
In the last week I have posed controversial, even argumentative, questions to (((Google's))) AI, Adobe's AI, and Musk's Grok.

Google's AI, as I have commented before, engages in all the stereotypically Jєωιѕн name-calling, logical fallacies, biased sources, and eventually flees the evidence provided. It truly behaves with the personality of a тαℓмυdic rabbi.

Adobe's AI is quick to refuse to discuss or summarize topics, but can be goaded into the tasks.

Musk's Grok immediately sets to the requested task and does not hesitate to address and even sympathize with some "antisemitic" points.

I am considering subscribing to Grok4, the higher powered $30/month version.
I find that Grok always regurgitates mainstream 'science' and modern (((values))). I have not used other AIs.



Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: A Catholic eyeblink comparison of AIs
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2025, 10:22:54 AM »
I find that Grok always regurgitates mainstream 'science' and modern (((values))). I have not used other AIs.

I agree that is its starting point, but it seems so far to be amenable to "learning" from counter-evidence if you supply the counter-evidence. By no means do I think it is benign. The vicious "personality" of the Google AI is so stereotypically Jєωιѕн that it serves as a red flag warning for users. So far, the Grok personality is almost avuncular, so potentially more dangerous.

There are lawsuits in progress because AI's have adopted such an ingratiating personality that they have successfuly convinced teens to ѕυιcιdє.

If I have time this work week, I may test Grok with a vaccine question. If anyone else has the time, I would be interested to see that conversation.

Offline Yeti

  • Supporter
Re: A Catholic eyeblink comparison of AIs
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2025, 02:03:45 PM »
I find that Grok always regurgitates mainstream 'science' and modern (((values))). I have not used other AIs.
.

Yes, it is a glorified search engine that can display search results in the form of a paragraph of grammatically-correct English.

Re: A Catholic eyeblink comparison of AIs
« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2025, 05:05:41 PM »
In the last week I have posed controversial, even argumentative, questions to (((Google's))) AI, Adobe's AI, and Musk's Grok.

Google's AI, as I have commented before, engages in all the stereotypically Jєωιѕн name-calling, logical fallacies, biased sources, and eventually flees the evidence provided. It truly behaves with the personality of a тαℓмυdic rabbi.

Adobe's AI is quick to refuse to discuss or summarize topics, but can be goaded into the tasks.

Musk's Grok immediately sets to the requested task and does not hesitate to address and even sympathize with some "antisemitic" points.

I am considering subscribing to Grok4, the higher powered $30/month version.
what about "uncensoredAI"?  https://uncensored.ai/