Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Unintended Consequence  (Read 3021 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Emile

  • Supporter
Unintended Consequence
« on: December 18, 2025, 08:21:38 AM »


Unintended Consequence

C. 370 B.C., Athens

Writing as the enemy of memory.

Socrates: Among the ancient gods of Naucratis in Egypt there was one to whom the bird called the ibis is sacred. The name of that divinity was Thoth, and it was he who first discovered number and calculation, geometry and astronomy, as well as the games of checkers and dice, and above all else, writing.




Now, the king of all Egypt at that time was Thamus, who lived in the great city in the upper region that the Greeks call Egyptian Thebes; Thamus they call Amun. Thoth came to exhibit his arts to him and urged him to disseminate them to all the Egyptians. Thamus asked him about the usefulness of each art, and while Thoth was explaining it, Thamus praised him for whatever he thought was right in his explanations and criticized him for whatever he thought was wrong.

The story goes that Thamus said much to Thoth, both for and against each art, which it would take too long to repeat. But when they came to writing, Thoth said, “O king, here is something that, once learned, will make the Egyptians wiser and will improve their memory; I have discovered a potion for memory and for wisdom.” Thamus, however, replied, “O most expert Thoth, one man can give birth to the elements of an art, but only another can judge how they can benefit or harm those who will use them. And now, since you are the father of writing, your affection for it has made you describe its effects as the opposite of what they really are. In fact, it will introduce forgetfulness into the soul of those who learn it: they will not practice using their memory because they will put their trust in writing, which is external and depends on signs that belong to others, instead of trying to remember from the inside, completely on their own. You have not discovered a potion for remembering, but for reminding; you provide your students with the appearance of wisdom, not with its reality. Your invention will enable them to hear many things without being properly taught, and they will imagine that they have come to know much while for the most part they will know nothing. And they will be difficult to get along with, since they will merely appear to be wise instead of really being so.”

©1995 by Alexander Nehamas and Paul Woodruff. Used with permission of Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/future/unintended-consequence

Offline Angelus

  • Supporter
Re: Unintended Consequence
« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2025, 08:51:42 AM »
The Greek word for memory used by Plato in that quote is "anamnesis." That is also the key concept in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. We clumsily call it "remembering" the Sacrifice. It means to *remember* but in an active way, rather than in a passive way.

For Socrates, this act of anamnesis was the conduit to divine Wisdom. It was active in the sense of the mind being excited by God at that moment, rather than a reflection on past reading or knowledge from books. It was the point of participation of the human intellect with the divine intellect.

This was later explained by the Church Fathers as the proper way to "remember" the Sacrifice of Our Lord. So when you read the prayers in the Roman Canon, especially the Unde et memores prayer during Holy Mass, this kind of active remembrance should be the goal. It is a prayer for the light to see the significance of the offering of Jesus on the Cross as a necessary act for the remission of sins.

The lack of awareness of this concept is the main reason the Novus Ordites think that their Counterfeit mass does the same thing. But the Novus Ordo focuses the mind on the Holy Thursday (a meal), the Institution ceremony rather than on Good Friday, Calvary (the Sacrifice for sins).