I just saw this poll on Microsoft Bing.
"If you could have one of these abilities, which would it be?"
The results floored me:
58% would like to be able to speak all human languages
42% would like to be able to "talk to animals"
That poll was WAY too close. If it had been given to a all Traditional Catholics, the results should have been close to 100% for "human languages".
1. Animals don't have much to say. Actually, they have nothing intelligent at all to say. They don't have speech. They aren't rational. We're not living in a stupid Disney cartoon!
2. Note that a large portion of this country is emotional, SJW, leftist, against reality, against religion, against God, etc.
42% of people think animals can talk; "we just don't understand them"! I guess they talk about the weather, they talk about us, etc. but unfortunately we can't listen in because no one has decoded dog barking or cat meowing yet. Give me a break!
Don't Protestants agree with Catholics on the role of animals? Don't they agree with Catholics that animals are lesser creatures, created by God, for our use, etc.? I guess it's a testament to the power of brainwashing (environmentalists, endless cartoons showing animals acting exactly like humans, etc.)
If someone could build a translator, all animal words would translate into "OW! OW!" (pain) "OOO! OOO!" (wanting something) "EH! EH!" (menacing growl, get away), "AAH! AAH!" (excitement, danger), etc.
Just picture the old (evolutionist-inspired) caveman stereotype: guys dressed in animal skins, with sloping foreheads, holding spears, they don't speak much, using words like "UGH!" and "OOGH!" and a lot of pointing and gesticulating. But even then, the primitive language, gesticulating and pointing implies rational intelligence which even the evolutionist's "cavemen" seemed to have to some budding degree. Animals don't even have that.