Author Topic: Would you do business with manifest homos? (Read 1627 times)

Disputaciones · « **on:** April 03, 2016, 05:00:11 PM »

What if you owned a restaurant, and a group of manifest homos came in? Would you still receive them nicely like any other customer?

Matto · « **Reply #1 on:** April 03, 2016, 05:01:22 PM »

Quote from: Disputaciones

What if you owned a restaurant, and a group of manifest homos came in? Would you still receive them nicely like any other customer?

If you don't serve them you will be sued for tens of thousands of dollars and lose. There is no freedom of association in this supposedly free country.

Earl of Devonshire · « **Reply #2 on:** April 03, 2016, 05:11:16 PM »

Considering in England you would be likely fined for not doing so. And unlike America we don't really have a subset of the population who would support you because of this (unlike Northern Ireland and even some parts of North West Scotland). Although if I had to serve them I'd donate the money I get off them to the church or a good Christian charity so their money goes to something good.

Prayerful · « **Reply #3 on:** April 03, 2016, 06:45:11 PM »

Quote from: Matto

Quote from: Disputaciones
What if you owned a restaurant, and a group of manifest homos came in? Would you still receive them nicely like any other customer?

If you don't serve them you will be sued for tens of thousands of dollars and lose. There is no freedom of association in this supposedly free country.

Yes, you would no longer have a business and the need to consider that dilemma would be gone. One part of customer service is serving people who are bit objectionable. You can offer it up for the souls in Purgatory.

wallflower · « **Reply #4 on:** April 03, 2016, 06:53:20 PM »

Serve food? Yes. But I don't consider that "doing business" necessarily, it's a service.

Truly doing business such as choosing a contractor, a repair man, a decorator, photographer etc..., no.

Immaculata001 · « **Reply #5 on:** April 03, 2016, 08:32:28 PM »

Serving food is not a problem. The problem is when businesses are asked to host "gαy weddings" or provide services that explicitly endorse a sin (decorating a cake with a message supporting a "gαy marriage," etc).

Stubborn · « **Reply #6 on:** April 04, 2016, 04:02:54 PM »

Quote from: Matto

Quote from: Disputaciones
What if you owned a restaurant, and a group of manifest homos came in? Would you still receive them nicely like any other customer?

If you don't serve them you will be sued for tens of thousands of dollars and lose. There is no freedom of association in this supposedly free country.

The way around this is to make sure the food is terrible and the service is worse.

ihsv · « **Reply #7 on:** April 05, 2016, 12:32:51 PM »

Quote from: Stubborn

Quote from: Matto
Quote from: Disputaciones
What if you owned a restaurant, and a group of manifest homos came in? Would you still receive them nicely like any other customer?

If you don't serve them you will be sued for tens of thousands of dollars and lose. There is no freedom of association in this supposedly free country.

The way around this is to make sure the food is terrible and the service is worse.

Bingo.

Even with baking cakes or providing flowers for "weddings", there are ways to "deal" with it without refusing service. We must be wise as serpents and simple as doves.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #8 on:** April 05, 2016, 01:17:04 PM »

Quote from: Stubborn

Quote from: Matto
Quote from: Disputaciones
What if you owned a restaurant, and a group of manifest homos came in? Would you still receive them nicely like any other customer?

If you don't serve them you will be sued for tens of thousands of dollars and lose. There is no freedom of association in this supposedly free country.

The way around this is to make sure the food is terrible and the service is worse.

You can get sued for this even ... if they can prove or get a jury to believe that the (atypically poor) food or service was due to their being gαy.

Stubborn · « **Reply #9 on:** April 05, 2016, 01:58:36 PM »

Quote from: Ladislaus

Quote from: Stubborn
Quote from: Matto
Quote from: Disputaciones
What if you owned a restaurant, and a group of manifest homos came in? Would you still receive them nicely like any other customer?

If you don't serve them you will be sued for tens of thousands of dollars and lose. There is no freedom of association in this supposedly free country.

The way around this is to make sure the food is terrible and the service is worse.

You can get sued for this even ... if they can prove or get a jury to believe that the (atypically poor) food or service was due to their being gαy.

Without a doubt they could sue, but what the heck, they'll sue if you refuse them anyway. May as well do what you can to wreck their special occasion and keep them from coming back, but instead of lacing the food with laxative, which, much as we might delight in doing something like that, we would restrain ourselves from doing any such a thing and just make all the food purposely bland with extra large (or extra small) portions and take some extra time to serve them.

I mean, if they sue for non-service, it likely will cost your whole business, but if you serve bland food on dirty plates an hour late, all they can get out of you is whatever they paid for your service - but at least you still have your business and you did your part to see to it that they don't come back.

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #10 on:** April 05, 2016, 03:08:11 PM »

If you run a restaurant, you should, ideally, have a commitment to excellence that extends even toward these pathetic, lust-based souls.

It's a better idea to pray for ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs than to make fun of them. It took me way to long to come to this same conclusion.

Follow the advice of Prayerful and offer it up for the souls in purgatory.

Stubborn · « **Reply #11 on:** April 05, 2016, 04:08:47 PM »

Quote from: Capt McQuigg

If you run a restaurant, you should, ideally, have a commitment to excellence that extends even toward these pathetic, lust-based souls.

It's a better idea to pray for ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs than to make fun of them. It took me way to long to come to this same conclusion.

Follow the advice of Prayerful and offer it up for the souls in purgatory.

You've been liberalized Capt.

If you run a restaurant, it is your restaurant and you have the right, even the responsibility to throw out the queers on their ear if you want - why? Because you own the restaurant, that's why.

By all means the queers need prayers, and they need to repent, and by all means the best thing that all people could do to help the queers is to refuse to serve them and refuse all association with them and even publicly rebuke them and warn them of their eternity and insist they stop causing scandal and etc. - but no way on God's green earth should we have to serve those public, deviant perverts.

ihsv · « **Reply #12 on:** April 05, 2016, 04:34:26 PM »

Certain sins are so bad, so unnatural, that they shouldn't even be named, let alone tolerated in public. The fact that they are manifestly ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ means they are flaunting it, publicly putting it on display.

Bear in mind that the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ cannot reproduce according to nature. Their principal means of "reproduction", then, is to spread their vice to others in society. Among the various means they employ is to put it on display in public, giving the false impression that it is "normal", and by intimidating the Christian into tacitly admitting (by his tolerating them) that their behavior is "acceptable."

Refusing to serve them is absolutely warranted. They must be clearly, manifestly of that "persuasion", of course. It's not enough to simply suspect.

If the laws of your locale are such that it is impossible to refuse service without incurring the wrath of the state, then other means of dissuasion can and should be employed.

MrYeZe · « **Reply #13 on:** April 06, 2016, 12:21:36 AM »

Quote

If you run a restaurant, it is your restaurant and you have the right, even the responsibility to throw out the queers on their ear if you want - why? Because you own the restaurant, that's why.

That's how it should be, but America is Satan's ѕуηαgσgυє, along with the rest of the modern West. They don't care if it's unconstitutional, or illegal to do so, they'll make you pay if you offend the fαɢɢօts, and the other Western countries have gone even further by actively considering speaking against them a crime with punishments equivalent to grand theft auto.

Graham · « **Reply #14 on:** April 06, 2016, 08:57:52 AM »

Quote from: ihsv

Certain sins are so bad, so unnatural, that they shouldn't even be named, let alone tolerated in public. The fact that they are manifestly ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ means they are flaunting it, publicly putting it on display.

Bear in mind that the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ cannot reproduce according to nature. Their principal means of "reproduction", then, is to spread their vice to others in society. Among the various means they employ is to put it on display in public, giving the false impression that it is "normal", and by intimidating the Christian into tacitly admitting (by his tolerating them) that their behavior is "acceptable."

Refusing to serve them is absolutely warranted. They must be clearly, manifestly of that "persuasion", of course. It's not enough to simply suspect.

If the laws of your locale are such that it is impossible to refuse service without incurring the wrath of the state, then other means of dissuasion can and should be employed.

Exactly. What means of dissuasion are you thinking of?