Ah Bishop Williamson in the society, what a dream I've never known. Interesting one of the letters mentions men wearing earrings.

"Original sin, whereby Eve made Adam sin and not the other way round (I Tim II 14), entailed Eve's being punished, amongst other things, by the turning of her natural and painless subordination to Adam into a punishing domination of his over her, for she had shown by seducing him that she needed to be controlled..."

Eve made Adam sin?  She seduced him? She needed to be controlled (because of this seduction)?
This is very similar to the fabrication found in Maria Valtorte's banned work Poem of the Man-God.

Scripture emphasis that it was Adam, not Eve, who sinned against God and brought death to all mankind. Adam tried to blame Eve (Gen.3:12), but Adam, who heard the command directly from God's mouth, is the one credited with sin’s entrance into the world (see Romans 5). Adam was not misinformed or misled; he was not seduced or deceived as Eve was, he simply decided to rebel against God’s command.

Ecclesiasticus 25:33 From the woman came the beginning of sin, and by her we all die.

Genesis 3:17 And to Adam he said: Because thou hast hearkened to the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee, that thou shouldst not eat

Let’s settle this.

We’ll get the best researchers and find out exactly which clothes God made for Adam and Eve and Catholics will wear only them.

Or, they can be reserved for Jews and Catholics will all dress like St. Joseph and Our Lady. The girls and ladies will be the only ones to have a choice between a wide variety of apparitions. 

Have you been reading Poem of the Man-God? The Church teaches that their sin was pride. Both of them.

To speak of concupiscence and "giving in to pleasure" is to add to the confusion of what His Lordship wrote. Adam was pure. He couldn't be tempted sɛҳuąƖly until after the fall. He was tempted in the only way he could be - through his intellect. This is why I questioned His Lordships emphasis; it is distorted and gives the erroneous impression of exactly what you are now preaching.

[W]e cannot believe that Adam was deceived, and supposed the devil's word to be truth, and therefore transgressed God's law, but that he by the drawings of kindred yielded to the woman, the husband to the wife, the one human being to the only other human being. For not without significance did the apostle say, And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression; 1 Timothy 2:14 but he speaks thus, because the woman accepted as true what the serpent told her, but the man could not bear to be severed from his only companion, even though this involved a partnership in sin. He was not on this account less culpable, but sinned with his eyes open. And so the apostle does not say, He did not sin, but He was not deceived. For he shows that he sinned when he says, By one man sin entered into the world, Romans 5:12 and immediately after more distinctly, In the likeness of Adam's transgression. But he meant that those are deceived who do not judge that which they do to be sin; but he knew. Otherwise how were it true Adam was not deceived? But having as yet no experience of the divine severity, he was possibly deceived in so far as he thought his sin venial. And consequently he was not deceived as the woman was deceived, but he was deceived as to the judgment which would be passed on his apology: The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me, and I did eat. Genesis 3:12 What need of saying more? Although they were not both deceived by credulity, yet both were entangled in the snares of the devil, and taken by sin.

That’s why research needs to be done!  We also know there’s no polyester, no mixing of wool with cotton or linen (flax). I’m already considering which Marian apparition I’ll wear to this Sunday Mass!