Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Women want men to get no sleep and still provide for family  (Read 4416 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jvk

Re: Women want men to get no sleep and still provide for family
« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2019, 07:55:32 PM »
I'd like to know when it became the norm that men were expected to start helping with the babies, anyway.  

Re: Women want men to get no sleep and still provide for family
« Reply #6 on: July 07, 2019, 02:19:48 AM »
I didn't listen to the video but long enough to hear her voice and accent. That said, TODAY, there are men who are not the primary providers, they actually are basically living off the woman. The babies are bottle fed. They have one child, maybe, two.

In a trad Catholic family, the man is the sole provider, the woman takes care of the children, the house,  some even the homeschooling, and babies are breast fed.

Two totally different scenarios.  


Re: Women want men to get no sleep and still provide for family
« Reply #7 on: July 07, 2019, 04:23:48 AM »
Another modern woman whining about a man.  Just move along.  Nothing new here. 

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Women want men to get no sleep and still provide for family
« Reply #8 on: July 07, 2019, 07:20:24 PM »
There is a world of difference between:
Women want men to get no sleep and still provide for family
and
One woman wants men to get no sleep and still provide for family.

To be honest, English doesn't imply any percentage of women in that sentence.

"Men kill sheep for fun at Speedway on July 4th"
There is an assumed [some] at the beginning of the sentence.

To remove the ambiguity, you could include "a few", "some", "most" or "all" at the beginning of the sentence. But in English, if you leave that detail out, "a few" or "some" is assumed.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Women want men to get no sleep and still provide for family
« Reply #9 on: July 07, 2019, 08:30:59 PM »
To be honest, English doesn't imply any percentage of women in that sentence.

"Men kill sheep for fun at Speedway on July 4th"
There is an assumed [some] at the beginning of the sentence.

To remove the ambiguity, you could include "a few", "some", "most" or "all" at the beginning of the sentence. But in English, if you leave that detail out, "a few" or "some" is assumed.

Well, if we're being picky technical, her statement that this thread only proves ONE (singular) WOMAN vs. the thread title WOMEN (plural) is correct.  This video is the opinion of one woman.