Author Topic: Woman's perspective on being single in your 30's (Read 11623 times)

Telesphorus · « **Reply #50 on:** February 13, 2012, 06:46:09 PM »

Quote from: s2srea

But we know how feminists think... whats the point of this?

I saw the article it seemed apropos this topic.

I'm looking to see if there are some outlandish errors.

It's very important to take on directly the feminist narrative about social change.

They are under pressure right now, because some of the chickens are coming home to roost, and they are doing what they can to control the narrative.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #51 on:** February 13, 2012, 06:51:50 PM »

Quote

My spotty anecdotal findings have revealed that, yes, in many cases, the more successful a man is (or thinks he is), the less interested he is in commitment.

Take the high-powered magazine editor who declared on our first date that he was going to spend his 30s playing the field. Or the prominent academic who announced on our fifth date that he couldn’t maintain a committed emotional relationship but was very interested in a physical one. Or the novelist who, after a month of hanging out, said he had to get back out there and tomcat around, but asked if we could keep having sex anyhow, or at least just one last time. Or the writer (yes, another one) who announced after six months together that he had to end things because he “couldn’t continue fending off all the sɛҳuąƖ offers.” And those are just the honest ones.

To be sure, these men were the outliers—the majority of my personal experience has been with commitment-minded men with whom things just didn’t work out, for one reason or another.

It's incredible how lacking in introspection this woman is, she doesn't realize that she's the one who doesn't want commitment, she's complaining about the "outliers" not wanting commitment - but then she says in relation to the "commitment minded men" - that "thing just didn't work out" - what the hell is that supposed to mean?

A blogger calls dalrock calls this a female delusion of believing that her "serial monogamy" is not in reality a form of promiscuity every bit as promiscuous as those "outliers" she's talking about, but being a woman, she can't wrap her head around it.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #52 on:** February 13, 2012, 06:56:11 PM »

Quote

where marriage-minded women are increasingly confronted with either deadbeats or players.

The word "deadbeat" is just used instinctively with this woman.

Men without money, and men who don't want to tie their fortunes to women like this woman, are "deadbeats."

s2srea · « **Reply #53 on:** February 13, 2012, 06:59:10 PM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Quote
where marriage-minded women are increasingly confronted with either deadbeats or players.

The word "deadbeat" is just used instinctively with this woman.

Men without money, and men who don't want to tie their fortunes to women like this woman, are "deadbeats."

Well... I wouldn't be too concerned about women like her if I were you...

Telesphorus · « **Reply #54 on:** February 13, 2012, 07:01:44 PM »

correction of the above:

Quote

The blogger Dalrock explains how women delude themselves into believing that "serial monogamy" is not in reality a form of promiscuity every bit as immoral as as the conduct of those "outliers" (men who are successful, or think they are!) she's talking about, but being a woman, she can't wrap her head around it.