Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Woman's Love Defined By Obedience To Man  (Read 8455 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Woman's Love Defined By Obedience To Man
« Reply #70 on: July 03, 2018, 04:44:41 PM »
Women by nature WANT TO AND ARE INCLINED TO FOLLOW THE LEAD OF THEIR HUSBANDS.  And they WILL follow their husbands unless the husband fails in leadership.  You see, the husband is the head and the leader in a marriage, and therefore the buck stops with him, and he's ultimately responsible for the breakdown of the marriage.  That kind of authority cuts both ways.  True leaders take responsibility for the failures of their organization (in this case family) and don't blame their underlings.  If you were working as a business leader in a company, and your group fails, your boss isn't going to listen to you whining about how your subordinates failed.  It is YOU who failed and it is YOU who will be held accountable.  Your boss won't fire your subordinates.  He'll fire you.  Similarly, if a man's marriage breaks down, HE is the one accountable for it before God.  If you don't accept this, then it is you who are unmanly and a feminist.  You will be mocked and scorned by your superiors if you effeminately point the finger at your subordinates.  Man up and assume the responsibility (and consequences) for YOUR FAILED LEADERSHIP.

I love it how you insist on the benefits of leadership, i.e. being able to boss people around and subject them to your will, but refuse to accept the responsibilities and accountability that come with it.  YOU as the husband are accountable for the success or failure of your family, and a true man will take ownership of this.  If anyone needs to man up, it's you.  If a woman leaves you, then it is YOUR failure, whether in having chosen poorly or having failed to lead and to love as you needed to in order to keep your family intact.  That is the attitude of a true leader and a true man, little boy.

Do you know what you did here?

Your "logic" argued that God failed for the revolt in Heaven and one-third of the angels being damned for eternity. Your "logic" says God failed as a leader, as a father, as head of His household - Heaven. Your "logic" says God is to blame for the pride of Lucifer and his resulting schizophrenia in thinking he was, or wanted to be, equal to God. Your "logic" is saying God is to blame for the pure evil of Lucifer and one-third of the angels, and God is to blame for the division in Heaven and ultimately casting these angels into hell for eternity.

You lose.

Re: Woman's Love Defined By Obedience To Man
« Reply #71 on: July 03, 2018, 05:22:26 PM »

Ladislaus, don't run, boy. What's your response to my above ^ response to you (the post just above this one)?


Re: Woman's Love Defined By Obedience To Man
« Reply #72 on: July 03, 2018, 05:25:34 PM »
Ladislaus, don't run, boy. What's your response to my above ^ response to you (the post just above this one)?
boy?  At least you're an equal opportunity insulter...

Re: Woman's Love Defined By Obedience To Man
« Reply #73 on: July 03, 2018, 05:30:59 PM »

Just as I thought, Ladislaus. You run because you have no response, and the reason you have no response is because the truth is on my side. And you know it.

This Ladislaus is the same knucklehead who said "God isn't a Catholic God" quite some time ago.




Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Woman's Love Defined By Obedience To Man
« Reply #74 on: July 03, 2018, 05:49:00 PM »
Just as I thought, Ladislaus. You run because you have no response, and the reason you have no response is because the truth is on my side. And you know it.

This Ladislaus is the same knucklehead who said "God isn't a Catholic God" quite some time ago.

Dude, you really need to grow up.  When someone doesn't answer you within minutes, you try to turn that into "running".