Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Catholic Living in the Modern World => Topic started by: SeanJohnson on August 29, 2019, 05:14:25 AM
-
I have been considering the explosion in the rise of the sodomite population, and noticed how it coincided with the advent of the internet in the mid-1990’s, and wondered whether there could be a correlation.
I recall that executed serial murderer Ted Bundy attributed his descent into perverse fantasy to pornography, and wondered whether, it it can affect men in that way, could it also affect them in other ways?
With these two thoughts in mind, I have long been of the opinion that as boys become sɛҳuąƖly conscious in their pubescent years, in a normal environment, natural law will take its course, and sɛҳuąƖity will develop as God intended.
But, if something should happen which interjects confusion into that development (eg., sɛҳuąƖ abuse, in which a boy begins to question his own sɛҳuąƖity because he felt pleasure amidst the abuse, and then incurs anxiety because of the fact, and draws the erroneous conclusion that he must be ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ against his own wishes, then after years of struggle and conflict, and building on that first mistaken conclusion, makes another erroneous judgment on top of it that, if this is the way he is, he must accept himself so as to have some degree of peace with self. Naturally, at this point, mistaken “self-acceptance” easily transitions to self-approval, which transitions to acceptance of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity as “normal,” and not immoral, since after all, he did not choose to become this way: He just always was!).
But in fact, he was not always so.
It was the confusion, which a little guidance early on after the trauma could have rectified, which caused a transformation.
I am forming an opinion that a similar psychological process is taking place because of pornography:
Something causes a young teen or teenager to disregard the conscience (drugs, alcohol, or simple fallen nature), or maybe it happens by accident, that he stumbles across some homo-erotic material, and he begins to wonder if he has taken pleasure with what he has seen. The conflict begins, and the same process outlined above takes place.
I have discovered an article by a mental health doctor which corroborates these suspicions regarding a link between pornography viewed by adolescents and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity here:
https://www.mentalhelp.net/internet/addiction/pornography-exposure-and-confusion/ (https://www.mentalhelp.net/internet/addiction/pornography-exposure-and-confusion/)
If this process I describe is correct, and pornography is a cause of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity, then parents who let their children surf the internet unattended are incurring tremendous culpability, given the widespread availability of filth.
But it also means that it is pointless to rage against the ride of sodomy without attacking the cause.
Homo-erotic porn bears some degree of responsibility for the rise (and acceptance) of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity in modern societies. But some degree is also to be born by parents who allow this material into their homes (and even by those who send their children away to college, where they are still unprepared to resist the seduction and snares of an evil academia themselves infected, and therefore promoting the infection.
-
But, if something should happen which interjects confusion into that development (eg., sɛҳuąƖ abuse, in which a boy begins to question his own sɛҳuąƖity because he felt pleasure amidst the abuse, and then incurs anxiety because of the fact, and draws the erroneous conclusion that he must be ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ against his own wishes, then after years of struggle and conflict, and building on that first mistaken conclusion, makes another erroneous judgment on top of it that, if this is the way he is, he must accept himself so as to have some degree of peace with self. Naturally, at this point, mistaken “self-acceptance” easily transitions to self-approval, which transitions to acceptance of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity as “normal,” and not immoral, since after all, he did not choose to become this way: He just always was!).
Indeed I read an article one and, although I can't remember the exact figure, some ridiculously high proportion of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs were abused as children. So clearly there is a strong correlation between the two.
The idea of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity as a "sɛҳuąƖ orientation" rather than a disease or perversion is also further disproven by the fact that, despite only maybe 1% of people being ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, 30% of paedophiles are. That's a 30x over-representation. The conclusion is clear, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is just another disease and abominable perversion that can develop in tandem with other perversions.
As for how pornography might cause it, every personal account and study I've read on it shows that it has a desensitising effect whereby the individual becomes bored of the more "vanilla" content they're watching, and move on to "fetish" content. A teenage boy might first look up pictures of naked women, then move on to watching ordinary sex scenes, but grow bored with that too, and might eventually find himself watching all kinds of perverted content. So it's clear that pornography develops perversions, and as ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is a perversion, it's clear to see how one could cause the other.
-
Henry Makow writes about how pornography helps turn men ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ.
-
Pornography has definitely played a part into the confusion with sexes, and violence toward each gender
-
With the explosion of pornography's accessibility, we have a civilization which has been given a practicable way not just to have sɛҳuąƖ pleasure without procreation, but even worse than that: to have sɛҳuąƖ pleasure without other people. That's a pretty big difference, IMO. I'm not sure contraceptive culture could ever have given us that; it could give us selfish sɛҳuąƖ pursuits, sure, but at the end of the day it was still the sort of thing that required habitual cooperation between two people who, however selfish, shared a similar interest and goal at least during their fornication. But even that isn't true anymore. The normative, habitual sɛҳuąƖ lives of modern people are completely solitary, totally independent. With that sort of habituation, is a sɛҳuąƖ accomplice then nothing more than a tool? If Kant was right about anything, it was that havoc would ensue when human beings are treated as means to ends. It's a perspective absolutely pregnant with potential for violence, and I think it explains the relationship between ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity and pornography use at a fundamental level. It isn't just that pornography use tends to accelerate into more and more aggressive perversions, it's that even if it didn't those who use it are being conditioned to pursue sɛҳuąƖ pleasure without other people which obviously entails that to the degree that other people are involved in sɛҳuąƖ pleasure, they are merely tools to be dispensed and disposed of according to one's passion. Ergo, sɛҳuąƖ violence (ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity).
-
I have been considering the explosion in the rise of the sodomite population, and noticed how it coincided with the advent of the internet in the mid-1990’s, and wondered whether there could be a correlation.
Not that I disagree with what you write further down Sean, but the explosion in the sodomite population is entirely connected to the rise of diversity. European white Millennial males are less likely to have committed the sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance than both white Boomers and Gen-Xers (X-ers less so than Boomers). Blacks (think Africa and AIDS here), Hispanics, and East Asians have much higher rates of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity than whites or Europeans.
On the other hand, since the mid-90's there has been an explosion in lesbianism across all races and ethnicities. Something like 15% of women in their 20's admit to having had gone lesbo. When it comes to heterosɛҳuąƖity's decline, its the women, not so much the men.
-
Pornography is generally associated with solitary masturbation while those practicing contraception partake in a form of mutual masturbation. Whether solitary or mutual this sɛҳuąƖ abuse is objectively very evil and as such may -- perhaps, more often than we would care to imagine -- tend to make the individual more open to accepting other evils including ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity -- even to the extent of sometimes becoming a practitioner of same.
As for transgenderism here is an article describing how it is the gateway to pedophilia: http://www.ncregister.com/blog/benjamin-wiker/transgenderism-as-a-gateway-to-pedophilia (http://www.ncregister.com/blog/benjamin-wiker/transgenderism-as-a-gateway-to-pedophilia)
-
A big topic that most of us here would agree on. It's good to be reminded of how porn and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity are linked.
Men are probably less prone to ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity only due to the strength of the natural drive. However, pornography does add jet fuel to the fire, so any fallen inclination or demonic temptations will be increased exponentially. Equally concerning to me is the massive increase of pedophilia (on both sides) and I can't help but think it is largely the result of constant exposure to internet porn and unrestrained diabolic suggestion that go along with it. Women have a more muted drive, and I believe most of the time the subliminal rationale behind their degeneracy is born out of a desire to avoid the physical intimidation a man represents while using deviant means to retain control. Complete control is the name of the game for both sexes and women would do nearly anything to secure a portion of it for themselves without having to be confrontational, at least when they are first entering into relationships. This shouldn't be too much of a surprise considering that the modern sɛҳuąƖ foundation is established first through self-abuse. I would think most sɛҳuąƖ relationships today outside of marriage are probably closer to an assisted form of self-abuse anyway.
One feminine extreme would be to seek out the most outrageous and aggressive behavior in a mate. This is also aided by pornography, obviously. If she doesn't know what she wants, it's better to be wanted. If she can't convince herself that she's living a decent life, get a man or woman who are addicted to impurity that they'll do anything to keep her the center of attention (at least when they know she's looking). Any kind of attention seems to be just another false reassurance of being needed. The other extreme consists of seeking out weak men. Since raw physical power does not express itself in women as it does in men, they have a natural interest in blunting any real potential threat before they settle in. That way a woman can also lay claim to the higher decision making skills and thus garner more material security. Maybe it's like nesting behavior, only ensuring that there is a kill switch for their mate as well. Welcome to the female obsession (gαy or straight) with feminizing men! This is probably why even ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs require a dominant and a submissive in their pairings. It's not that they truly compliment each other, but that they assist each other in digging the grave of their own narcissistic rebellion.
Mostly I think that male ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity comes from some kind of traumatic sɛҳuąƖ experience early in life, as men are the primary targets of all physical abuse, including sɛҳuąƖ. That being said, I'm sure the more gradual process of being exposed to porn and liberalism in general can help make it happen like it does for females. ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is so thoroughly incentivized for those wishing to carve out a permanent protected social space for themselves, that many seemingly normal people (men and women) who you'd never think would've had this problem contract it. The really scary thing is when degeneracy gets to the point of targeting children, and it seems to come from men online a lot more than the women, but then we have the majority of teacher abuse scandals coming from women. Either way, it is demonically inspired. Even some of the most basic natural graces are being withdrawn from the world as belief in the True Christ and the True Catholic Church breaks down.
-
... the explosion in the sodomite population is entirely connected to the rise of diversity. European white Millennial males are less likely to have committed the sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance than both white Boomers and Gen-Xers (X-ers less so than Boomers). Blacks (think Africa and AIDS here), Hispanics, and East Asians have much higher rates of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity than whites or Europeans.
On the other hand, since the mid-90's there has been an explosion in lesbianism across all races and ethnicities. Something like 15% of women in their 20's admit to having had gone lesbo. When it comes to heterosɛҳuąƖity's decline, its the women, not so much the men.
There is no explosion of sodomite population, that is the media blowing up the appearances. I still think the sodomite population is what it always was, no more than 2% of the population. I was of the world and I know the world, and I do not see more sodomites today than I saw say 40 years ago when I lived in one of their favored destinations. The only difference today is that they are more obvious, back in my day the average Trad Joe/Jane did not see that the sodomites were all around them.
-
Will Pornography Make you Queer?
No, it won't if what a man calls pornography involves only women. If a man however watches and seeks to watch pornography involving a man and a woman, then he was already a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, it did not make him one.
-
A lot of young men or girls also were raised by single moms without fathers tend to be easily brainwashed into the lifestyle. Schools target children from broken families.
-
If Dad is into porno, he invites the demons into the home. Don’t be surprised if some of them promote the unnatural vice.
-
I heard so many women are uploading amateur porn videos of themselves onto the internet. These women are severely contributing to the problem. Of course, nobody is forcing the weak men to view the smut, but if it wasn't there in the first place, then the problem wouldn't exist.
-
After reading the posts, what is the solution? A priest I know, thought one solution was a protestant program for the price of $162. of DVDs to help cure those of Porn. My soul hurt, with this solution, which it is not IMO.
-
There is no explosion of sodomite population, that is the media blowing up the appearances. I still think the sodomite population is what it always was, no more than 2% of the population.
I agree, I think the media overestimates the population, so as to make it more attractive and to use the movement for political gains. However, I disagree and think that the population is larger now that it was 20 years ago. If it was 2% 20 years ago, it's probably closer to 5-10% now. That's still very small in the grand scheme of things, but statistically a jump from 2% to 5% is a 250% increase. You might say that such an increase is not likely but if you look back in history at the Greeks and other pagan civilizations, such activity was common. And since the Catholic Western nations have rejected Christian morals for the past 50 years, they are returning to the practice of paganism, which includes worshiping nature and worshiping self, which ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is a top symptom of these spiritual diseases. This is why God always has to destroy such nations that practice this evil; because it's such a moral cancer that once it's established in society, the society will implode (or be conquered) in short order. God's act of destroying it is akin to cutting off a gangrenous limb. There's no life left to save; God has no other choice but to start over.
-
I agree, I think the media overestimates the population, so as to make it more attractive and to use the movement for political gains. However, I disagree and think that the population is larger now that it was 20 years ago. If it was 2% 20 years ago, it's probably closer to 5-10% now. That's still very small in the grand scheme of things, but statistically a jump from 2% to 5% is a 250% increase. You might say that such an increase is not likely but if you look back in history at the Greeks and other pagan civilizations, such activity was common. And since the Catholic Western nations have rejected Christian morals for the past 50 years, they are returning to the practice of paganism, which includes worshiping nature and worshiping self, which ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is a top symptom of these spiritual diseases. This is why God always has to destroy such nations that practice this evil; because it's such a moral cancer that once it's established in society, the society will implode (or be conquered) in short order. God's act of destroying it is akin to cutting off a gangrenous limb. There's no life left to save; God has no other choice but to start over.
Strict adherence to the 2% rule lends credence to a purely naturalistic view of man. The more demonic power is allowed to attack the Church and hold sway over society, the more the ratio will increase. It may have started a very small percentage prior to the Kinsey Report, but since then I think 10% or so isn't far off. The moderns have patterned their sɛҳuąƖity off of prison rape and child abuse.
-
I agree, I think the media overestimates the population, so as to make it more attractive and to use the movement for political gains. However, I disagree and think that the population is larger now that it was 20 years ago. If it was 2% 20 years ago, it's probably closer to 5-10% now.
I don't remember the exact figures, but in one of his talks regarding communist tactics, Fr. John O'Connor said no matter what it is that is being promoted or protested, it only takes like 2% or 3% to get the majority to join that 2% or 3% - making that 2% or 3% a much, much larger group.
Over the years, this has proven itself to be true. Whether there is a larger percentage of queers today or not, there are certainly more queers now than 40 years ago and certainly there are a whole lot more people that accept them as normal or harmless these days than in the past, which only helps fuel their agenda and keeps their numbers growing.
-
The other extreme consists of (women) seeking out weak men. Since raw physical power does not express itself in women as it does in men, they have a natural interest in blunting any real potential threat before they settle in. That way a woman can also lay claim to the higher decision making skills and thus garner more material security. Maybe it's like nesting behavior, only ensuring that there is a kill switch for their mate as well. Welcome to the female obsession (gαy or straight) with feminizing men!
Modern women who seek weak men enjoy the control/authority for a while, but then regret it and end up hating the man (and themselves) because deep down women want a strong man and they want to feel safe and secure by his masculinity (which is why the "fifty shades of gray" books are so popular - because they play to the woman's psychological need for being able to trust in a man who is in charge). Ergo, the woman gets divorced, which is proven by the fact that over 75% of divorces are initiated by the wife.
.
When human nature rebels, they create disorder in God's plan. By and large, men have been neutered by feminist politics and the legal system and by a culture of fun, pleasure and sports. Women are happy when they are subservient to a man and when they feel secure of his authority. Men are happy when they are in charge and in control of their environment. Feminism creates the temptation that women can make THEMSELVES secure by being their OWN authority. Women buy into this lust for control, being their fallen nature desires this rebellion, as did Eve. But this just creates disorder.
.
The good news is, that all this disorder will eventually end in war, either global or civil. I say this is good news because when the current state of affairs devolves into chaos, then the natural order of things will return, just as a balloon held under water will eventually rise to the surface. Human nature cannot be subverted forever. Once society breaks down due to war, then men will step up and fight or die. And women will no longer be protected by the state, so they will have to be subservient to men. It won't be pretty, but the wages of sin never are. God will clean up this mess and He will guide those who have to walk this crazy road of recovery from chaos to normalcy.
-
Whether there is a larger percentage of queers today or not, there are certainly more queers now than 40 years ago and certainly there are a whole lot more people that accept them as normal or harmless these days than in the past, which only helps fuel their agenda and keeps their numbers growing.
Yes, I think most of the normal people who go gαy are those who have given up on religion, of whatever age. And there are a lot of people who have given up on religion.
It may have started a very small percentage prior to the Kinsey Report, but since then I think 10% or so isn't far off. The moderns have patterned their sɛҳuąƖity off of prison rape and child abuse.
Let's not forget that most people in power (national, state, local politicians...lawyers, judges...college presidents...media...Fortune 500 CFOs and CEOs...) the list goes on and on. All of these people are typically high-ranking freemasons who are exposed to gαy-dom and (eventually) child rape, child abuse and ritual sacrifice. They promote the queer lifestyle in various ways, because this is what their master wants, who is satan.
European white Millennial males are less likely to have committed the sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance than both white Boomers and Gen-Xers (X-ers less so than Boomers). Blacks (think Africa and AIDS here), Hispanics, and East Asians have much higher rates of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity than whites or Europeans.
Interesting. Do you have more info on this and why it is?
-
They are definitely trying to blur the lines between normal behavior and homo perversion.
Contraception brings any normal couple a big step closer to being a sodomite couple, because neither is fertile! Both are 100% selfish. Not just engaging in sterile relations (because that could be said of older couples as well) but PURPOSELY, artificially sterile relations.
Sure, plenty of Prottys attack sodomites, but they really don't have a leg to stand on. When the sodomites retort with, "I prefer A to get my pleasure, you prefer B." there is no valid retort for them. I mean, no retort that isn't hypocritical and inconsistent.
But a thing about porn -- it's not just a bunch of nudes. If only! As others pointed out, there is "vanilla" porn but then there are dozens of specialized "fetishes" ready to go when that vanilla porn stops being interesting enough to "do the job". And like drugs, porn loses its effect over time, so that you need a greater and greater dose with the passage of months and years.
But early in this "cycle" is an emphasis on SODOMY, even between men and women. That is to say, copulation outside the natural vessel, and in particular "the back door". If you listen to modern speech, watch modern movies, you'd swear it's every guy's dream (spoken or unspoken) to have a girl who likes "the back door". That has to be a porn thing, because I've never used porn and to me that whole idea seems stupid. It is best summed up with a one word answer: WHY?
To a sane mind, not perverted or addled by pornography, one would always prefer to eat the fine meal set before them in a restaurant, rather than saying "no thanks, I'll pass today" and going out to the parking lot and licking sand, dirt, and bugs off the pavement instead. Or maybe taking a large syringe and injecting a weak "nutrient solution" directly into their stomach, like diabetics do with insulin.
So let's see what (((They))) have done -- a huge number of normal, heterosɛҳuąƖ couples are/were promiscuous, their union is purposely/artificially sterile, and they even practice sodomy.
Now you see why the Homo lobby has gained so much power? The majority has practically joined them!
-
They are definitely trying to blur the lines between normal behavior and homo perversion.
Contraception brings any normal couple a big step closer to being a sodomite couple, because neither is fertile! Both are 100% selfish. Not just engaging in sterile relations (because that could be said of older couples as well) but PURPOSELY, artificially sterile relations.
Sure, plenty of Prottys attack sodomites, but they really don't have a leg to stand on. When the sodomites retort with, "I prefer A to get my pleasure, you prefer B." there is no valid retort for them. I mean, no retort that isn't hypocritical and inconsistent.
But a thing about porn -- it's not just a bunch of nudes. If only! As others pointed out, there is "vanilla" porn but then there are dozens of specialized "fetishes" ready to go when that vanilla porn stops being interesting enough to "do the job". And like drugs, porn loses its effect over time, so that you need a greater and greater dose with the passage of months and years.
But early in this "cycle" is an emphasis on SODOMY, even between men and women. That is to say, copulation outside the natural vessel, and in particular "the back door". If you listen to modern speech, watch modern movies, you'd swear it's every guy's dream (spoken or unspoken) to have a girl who likes "the back door". That has to be a porn thing, because I've never used porn and to me that whole idea seems stupid. It is best summed up with a one word answer: WHY?
To a sane mind, not perverted or addled by pornography, one would always prefer to eat the fine meal set before them in a restaurant, rather than saying "no thanks, I'll pass today" and going out to the parking lot and licking sand, dirt, and bugs off the pavement instead. Or maybe taking a large syringe and injecting a weak "nutrient solution" directly into their stomach, like diabetics do with insulin.
So let's see what (((They))) have done -- a huge number of normal, heterosɛҳuąƖ couples are/were promiscuous, their union is purposely/artificially sterile, and they even practice sodomy.
Now you see why the Homo lobby has gained so much power? The majority has practically joined them!
Once one becomes addicted to the physical act, the imagination scours the subject's soul of any value outside of fulfilling that purpose. Pornography is the most efficient way of doing that and the further technology advances, it only gets worse. We have already entered into a Blade Runner-esque dystopian future of "pleasure model" robots and hologram AI girlfriends and sex acts.
Naturally, porn completely bypasses the idea that Our Lord is the Master of all creation and that every individual is called to be holy. There is a sense of a Godforsaken alternate reality whenever this stuff comes through on screen (mainstream or not) and you almost never hear about the immediate or long-term real consequences. All the evidence is there if you want to look though. We see elite actors and actresses do softcore stuff in movies all the time but then when their dumpster-fire lives become mainstream news, it's all shrugged it off like one has nothing to do with the other. That's at least one of my issues with the production of "The Passion." Gibson brought in a lot of actors who were unrepentant in this regard, most especially Monica Bellucci. There were some scenes where I got the distinct impression she didn't have the faintest idea how to play the part and failed miserably. Personal tastes aside, there were plenty of other problems with that project, but the actions of the director and the actors long after the movie until this day speaks volumes as well.
But back to the point, it is frightening to consider how far a man or woman can fall at just a click of a button. The lengths of depravity contained within this stuff causes us to carry more sɛҳuąƖ guilt on average than all previous generations combined.
Let's not forget that most people in power (national, state, local politicians...lawyers, judges...college presidents...media...Fortune 500 CFOs and CEOs...) the list goes on and on. All of these people are typically high-ranking freemasons who are exposed to gαy-dom and (eventually) child rape, child abuse and ritual sacrifice. They promote the queer lifestyle in various ways, because this is what their master wants, who is satan.
Indisputable as far as I'm concerned. I would think most of those elites are the result of satanic occult induction! The rest of the population first gets fooled into barely tolerating it (legal only), then by normalizing it (social). Again, from the top down. All the while the next few steps of actively promoting it, showing it, identifying with it, are supplied by the shock troops of satanically inspired sɛҳuąƖ revolutionaries and have always continued to gain power and traction as long as I can remember. I'd bet today it's so bad that some unfortunate people are guilt-tripped into trying it for themselves due to how twisted around their normal senses of shame and honor have become.
-
Yes I think pornography might lead to ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity.
Not directly, but through various related sɛҳuąƖ sins. One Catholic nun spoke of this. And one researcher said gαys are not born that way, so it should be caused by sins.
-
It seems to me that the current proliferation of alternative sex restrooms is legitimizing the sin of Sodom.
Principles are at the root of corruption. The legalization of birth control systems was the Rosetta Stone that culminated with abortion, the principle violated being that a fertilized egg is not understood as a PERSON. The Supreme Court did not know what a person is.
-
European white Millennial males are
less likely to have committed the sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance than both white Boomers and Gen-Xers (X-ers less so than Boomers).
-
European white Millennial males are
less likely to have committed the sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance than both white Boomers and Gen-Xers (X-ers less so than Boomers).
I disagree. The Millennial generation is the most fαɢɢօty generation since Sodom & Gomorrah. It is true that Boomers pioneered fαɢɢօtry and committed a lot of pedo-sodomite abuse against little boys under the radar, and the effect is more fαɢs in today's society. Abused boys are more likely to become fag themselves and abuse little boys.
-
Once you accept the sin of contraception all sɛҳuąƖ morality becomes ‘negotiable’ because it is all a perversion of God’s purpose.
-
I agree that the root of this problem is in pornography. It corrupts the mind to depths that in former ages would have been unimaginable.
I think it is important to look at the timeline of when pornography really gained traction in society, which was the late 60’s and 70’s and it became even more prevalent in the Internet age.
If the real Catholic Church with a real Pope were in control there would have been endless preaching against this very grave modern evil. Catholics at every parish would have been reminded of the gravity of mortal sin, that it will lead to Hell, and that watching this garbage is a always a mortal sin. What were Paul VI, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, and now Francis doing to combat this, the most vile and pervasive moral evil in the history of the world. Absolute nothing!
A Pope, even a bad one, would never sit idly by doing nothing as the wolf is universally, in every diocese, country, city and village throughout the entire world is now and has been for decades devouring the sheep, by perverting their minds with pornography.
-
Viewing porn is one of the most effeminate and cuckish behaviors around. Watching two people use each other like property, instead of taking action to procure a real life partner for marriage and love.