Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Why do Protestants Assume We do Not Accept Jesus?  (Read 4635 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Why do Protestants Assume We do Not Accept Jesus?
« on: February 25, 2012, 02:52:06 PM »
The whole sacrifice of the Mass is Christ centered.  :incense:

Sorry. I as just venting. It is so difficult to reason with Protestants.

Offline Capt McQuigg

  • Supporter
Why do Protestants Assume We do Not Accept Jesus?
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2012, 03:04:31 PM »
If they think we don't accept Jesus, albeit that is a protestant twist, they do have some very unusual interpretations.

No kidding, I once had a conversation about 13 or so years ago where the young man earnestly and with no malice or even bad thoughts intended, he said that Catholics have crucifixes because they don't believe Jesus rose from the dead.

I knew he just completely lacked knowledge so I never rolled my eyes or resorted to sarcasm at any time - never do this because it ruins any chance of a legitimate conversation - and I said to him that the crucifix means that we Catholics believe that Jesus rose body and soul into Heaven.  

Since I was explaining it in a plain straightforward way, he was receptive to the idea and understood it.  You could see it in his eyes that he realized how wrong he was.  

We talked for about another half hour about priests and other Catholic items.  

This conversation was possible because he was active in his Bible study group and was truly interested in learning.



Why do Protestants Assume We do Not Accept Jesus?
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2012, 03:39:08 PM »
Simple: because they're confused.

They think the Catholic Church is nothing more than a Mary-worshipping cult. One Protestant who owns some anti-Catholic website went as far as to say that Catholics "are just pagans who hide behind complex and confusing doctrines".

In reality, it is the Protestants who are in error. It's funny how they say we are cultists for following the Pope, when the Protestant Reformation was a cult.

Why do Protestants Assume We do Not Accept Jesus?
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2012, 08:07:23 PM »
Protestant might believe all kinds of things. They frequently believe that the Latin Vulgate is heretical, accusing it of being deliberately changed to satisfy a more pagan interpretation of Christianity. They believe that Catholics deify Mary, considering her to be somehow made to be part of the Trinity, and so warping Christianity to be in line with some pagan (including ancient Egyptian) cults who have a deistic trinity consisting of a Father/Mother/Son. They also believe that graven images of God amount to idolatry, so crucifixes with a corpus are no-go. Some see that praying at statues is akin to idolatry also. The above does not really include Lutherans or Anglicans, who generally have a better understanding of basic theology and so are less easily deluded. Some Protestants are offended by Easter eggs, because they have pagan origins, and others argue against various aspects of how Catholics celebrate Christmas, and more creative people come up with arguments against pretty much everything else, because it is against their business model to lose their flock to Catholicism.

Now most of these accusations are Masonic and Jєωιѕн in origin, because in their cult a lot of emphasis is given to study of ancient religions (including тαℓмυdic Judaism) and this knowledge is used to discredit Catholicism.

Traditional Catholics can usually give good refutations to all of the above, as most if not all are based on a misunderstanding of what is fundamental to the religion and what is cultural adaptation. Cultural adaptation is not necessarily wrongful. To give a fictitious example, If everybody in a given city or region had the habit of eating cashews at lunchtime on First Tuesdays to pay homage to some kind of "nut deity", there is nothing stopping people from turning Cashews Tuesday into, say, a devotion to St. Bob, bishop and martyr, who dedicated his life to helping nuts and the poor but was slain by a marauding crowd of masonic zealots. Of course masons will chip away (so to speak) trying to spread fear uncertainty and doubt, saying that cashews have some kind of geometric shape that means the whole thing is a masonic symbol of a partial eclipse, and so credit themselves with having invented everything and ridiculing Catholics as somehow worshiping the Sun and Moon. Catholics are then left bemused at this bizarre accusation and it will then take several generations before a defector from the Masons reveals that the whole thing was made up, but century after century people will come up with new ways to attack what by that time has become part of the Catholic liturgical calendar.

Why do Protestants Assume We do Not Accept Jesus?
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2012, 08:45:59 PM »
Quote from: Maizar
Protestant might believe all kinds of things. They frequently believe that the Latin Vulgate is heretical, accusing it of being deliberately changed to satisfy a more pagan interpretation of Christianity. They believe that Catholics deify Mary, considering her to be somehow made to be part of the Trinity, and so warping Christianity to be in line with some pagan (including ancient Egyptian) cults who have a deistic trinity consisting of a Father/Mother/Son. They also believe that graven images of God amount to idolatry, so crucifixes with a corpus are no-go. Some see that praying at statues is akin to idolatry also. The above does not really include Lutherans or Anglicans, who generally have a better understanding of basic theology and so are less easily deluded. Some Protestants are offended by Easter eggs, because they have pagan origins, and others argue against various aspects of how Catholics celebrate Christmas, and more creative people come up with arguments against pretty much everything else, because it is against their business model to lose their flock to Catholicism.

Now most of these accusations are Masonic and Jєωιѕн in origin, because in their cult a lot of emphasis is given to study of ancient religions (including тαℓмυdic Judaism) and this knowledge is used to discredit Catholicism.

Traditional Catholics can usually give good refutations to all of the above, as most if not all are based on a misunderstanding of what is fundamental to the religion and what is cultural adaptation. Cultural adaptation is not necessarily wrongful. To give a fictitious example, If everybody in a given city or region had the habit of eating cashews at lunchtime on First Tuesdays to pay homage to some kind of "nut deity", there is nothing stopping people from turning Cashews Tuesday into, say, a devotion to St. Bob, bishop and martyr, who dedicated his life to helping nuts and the poor but was slain by a marauding crowd of masonic zealots. Of course masons will chip away (so to speak) trying to spread fear uncertainty and doubt, saying that cashews have some kind of geometric shape that means the whole thing is a masonic symbol of a partial eclipse, and so credit themselves with having invented everything and ridiculing Catholics as somehow worshiping the Sun and Moon. Catholics are then left bemused at this bizarre accusation and it will then take several generations before a defector from the Masons reveals that the whole thing was made up, but century after century people will come up with new ways to attack what by that time has become part of the Catholic liturgical calendar.


It is sad  a post such as yours is so lengthy and is the truth but still only exposes a small part of how deceived Protestants are. Hopefully many of these Protestants will soon be receptive to the truth.  :reading: