Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => Catholic Living in the Modern World => Topic started by: josefamenendez on November 07, 2020, 10:33:36 PM

Title: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: josefamenendez on November 07, 2020, 10:33:36 PM
From AKA Catholic

Who is Taylor Marshall? Part 1: The Crucified Rabbi
 Guest Contributor (https://akacatholic.com/author/guest-contributor/)  November 6, 2020  No Comments (https://akacatholic.com/who-is-taylor-marshall-part-1-the-crucified-rabbi/#comments)
(https://akacatholic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/TN-and-Bergoglio-1024x683.jpg) (https://akacatholic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/TN-and-Bergoglio.jpg)
By: Dr. Jesse Russell
Something strange has happened to traditional Catholic media.
For at least five years, there has been a radical shift in both the tone and content of much of the stalwarts of traditionalist publications and journals as well as a new generation of more polished, “Web 2.0” friendly podcasters, writers, and meme-smiths.
This change has followed the rapid influence of “JPII” conservative Catholics into the traditionalist movement, a phenomenon initially triggered by Pope Benedict XVI’s July 2007 Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificuм as well as the general “trad-friendly” tenor of the Bavarian theologian’s pontificate.
These growing ranks of refugees from the John Paul II era were accustomed to the upbeat and flashy world of Steubenville conferences, EWTN news reports, and National Catholic Register articles.
Upon first approach, the often dour, Count Dracula-esque, “get off my lawn,” demeanor of some in the traditionalist milieu was off-putting to those nursed on late twentieth and early twenty-first century conservative American Catholicism, a movement very much influenced by the very bourgeois and suburbanite Evangelical Protestantism.
However, as if by magic, many of the old traditionalist publications (as well as, interestingly, some traditionalist groups) began a radical about face in how they presented their material, adopting the methods of “Web 2.0”—especially the world of YouTube-ing with the aid of relatively cheap A.V. equipment and sophisticated, professional grade editing software.
This rhetorical shift was itself matched by a marked change in the content of traditionalist media.
No longer were certain “red pilled” topics acceptable in either electronic or print traditionalist media.
Beginning in 2019, there was further a decided effort to unite major members of the Catholic right together—regardless of how these Catholics interpreted Vatican II and the Novus Ordo Missae.
As quickly became apparent, this initiative to fuse together the disparate factions in traditionalism with trad-leaning conservative Catholics was not for the sake of a genuine search for a true and clear understanding of what has happened to the Church over the past century, but rather to form a political alliance to attempt to ensure that president Donald Trump would receive the lion’s share of the Catholic vote in 2020.
While many traditionalists have made (and continue to make) legitimate arguments for Catholic support of Donald Trump, the frenzied and almost messianic tone of traditionalist support of Donald Trump became increasingly unnerving.
Moreover, it soon became evident that these rebranded Catholic traditionalists had a curious relationship with the secular media empire of the neo-populist right, a movement with curious ties to both foreign and domestic entities traditionally hostile to the interests of the Catholic Church.
While “old school” traditionalist media groups spear-headed this effort, a new, rising star quickly was anointed as the spokesman of Trumpian neo-traditionalism: Dr. Taylor Marshall.
A former Anglican minister whose entrance to the Catholic Church in May of 2006 brought him into the high powered world of Opus Dei (Marshall began his Catholic career as the assistant director of Opus Dei’s Catholic Information Center in Washington, DC), Marshall had made a career in Catholic education as well as in the burgeoning business of online blogging, vlogging, and other forms of internet self-promotion.
However, the publication of Marshall’s 2019 Infiltration and its curious subsequent promotion on a host of conservative and populist media outlets, the east Texan Catholic convert quickly became the face of the new brand of Catholic traditionalist.
A reading of Infiltration is essential to our argument, but it will have to wait until the third installment of our series.
In order to understand who Taylor Marshall is as well as who has helped to promote him and the new rebranding of Catholic traditionalism, we must turn to Dr. Marshall’s 2009 work, The Crucified Rabbi: Judaism and the Origins of Catholic Christianity
Based on a series of lectures that Marshall gave at the Catholic Information Center, The Crucified Rabbi is, in effect, a polyphonic book with two principal voices.
The first is the Catholic voice, which makes a solid and reasonable assessment of those who identify as Jєωιѕн in the contemporary, as well as those who have been critical of various powerful elements in the Jєωιѕн community.
Marshall rightly notes in The Crucified Rabbi that “to disagree with Zionism or Israeli politics is not anti-Semitism” and one “can be opposed to the Jєωιѕн тαℓмυd, Zionism, Israeli politics, and even the Jєωιѕн religion without hating Jєωs or seeking their extermination.”
Marshall makes a number of important points here.
Since the discovery of the contents of the тαℓмυd, Catholics have, until the twentieth century, viewed this key text of diasporic Judaism as a fundamentally wicked book full of blasphemous and sacrilegious material.  Thus, criticism of the тαℓмυd does not necessarily translate into malice toward Jєωs as an ethnic group.
Moreover, while many Evangelicals and Catholic neoconservatives are fanatical supporters of the state of Israel, a Christian is certainly able to present legitimate criticism of Israel and its supporters without being inspired by hatred or malice.
In The Crucified Rabbi, Marshall further notes that there “is a vast difference between the biblical Judaism of Moses and the тαℓмυdic Judaism of the rabbis in the centuries after Christ.”
Again, this point is critical, for many Catholics assume that the religion of contemporary Jєωs is merely a continuation of the Old Testament religion when, in fact, тαℓмυdic Judaism incorporates a number of beliefs and practices that differ markedly from the faith of Moses.
Indeed, in The Crucified Rabbi, Marshall even goes so far as to say that “post-Pentecostal Judaism is a dead letter.”
However, at the same time, there is a second voice in The Crucified Rabbi, which, paradoxically, gives the impression (whether Marshall intends or not) that тαℓмυdic Judaism is synonymous with the Old Testament religion.
More importantly, Marshall’s The Crucified Rabbi creates the impression that, for the past 2,000 years, Jєωs have been the victims “of numerous examples of violence” perpetrated on them by Christians. Although these “Jєωιѕн persecutions were sparked by secular politics,” Marshall continues, “we cannot deny that it was baptized Christians who committed these acts of injustice.”
Marshall’s characterization of Jєωιѕн-Christian relations as being a one sided persecution of Jєωs by Catholics is especially curious.
It seems to chafe against the argument presented by Dr.  E. Michael Jones in his The Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History, which Dr. Jones released in 2008.
In Jones’s view, the past two thousand years of Catholic-Jєωιѕн relations has been marked by efforts by members of the Jєωιѕн community to destroy Catholic civilization through revolutionary mischief.
Marshall’s book, it must be noted, was released in 2009, a year after Jones’s and presents a radically different picture of Catholic Jєωιѕн relations.
Finally, Marshall admits that in an earlier edition of Crucified Rabbi, he condemned the Catholic teaching of “supersessionism” as “an erroneous teaching.” Due to critical feedback he received, Marshall edited these statements in later editions of the book.
Nonetheless, Marshall approvingly provides Pope John Paul II’s statement that the “people of Israel” are “the people of the covenant.” Marshall further writes that “the people of Israel continue to be a perpetual eschatological sign of God’s love. They are a reminder that the ‘gifts and calling of God is irrevocable’ (Rom 11:29). The preserving presence of Israel on earth is perhaps the best proof that God exists…”
Whatever Marshall means by these words, they lead to the impression that God still has a covenant with the people of Israel (and perhaps even the state of Israel?).
As a final aside, Marshall has boasted on his website that he himself is of αѕнкenαzι Jєωιѕн ancestry (allegedly only 9.65%).
Certainly, having Jєωιѕн ancestry does not prove that Taylor Marshall’s motives are somehow impure.
What is weird, however, is that Marshall pulled his revelatory post down after it began to circulate on various traditionalist blogs.
Why?
To answer this question, we must dig deeper into the life and work of Taylor Marshall, and, by doing so, we will uncover just how and why not simply traditionalist Catholic media, but virtually the entire Catholic traditionalist movement in America has been, it appears, infiltrated.
Stay Tuned for Part II of Who is Taylor Marshall? Sword and Serpent.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 07, 2020, 11:04:56 PM
In Chapter 3 of his book Salvation is from the Jєωs (https://books.google.com/books?id=dXmSDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Salvation+is+from+the+Jєωs&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjBkYCQirjiAhVDVK0KHSC-D-oQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q&f=false)Roy Schoeman advises that Jєωs should leaven the Church like yeast (https://books.google.com/books?id=dXmSDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Salvation+is+from+the+Jєωs&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjBkYCQirjiAhVDVK0KHSC-D-oQ6AEIKDAA#v=snippet&q=yeast&f=false)Schoeman contradicts God’s repeated and emphatic warnings to “beware the leaven of the Pharisees” (Matthew 16:6 (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=47&ch=16&l=6#x)16:11 (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=47&ch=16&l=11#x)16:12 (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=47&ch=16&l=12#x)Mark 8:15 (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=48&ch=8&l=15#x)Luke 12:1 (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=49&ch=12&l=1#x)). Sadly, Taylor Marshal is oblivious to such subversion:
Here Come the Hebrew Catholics https://taylormarshall.com/2010/10/here-come-hebrew-catholics.html (https://taylormarshall.com/2010/10/here-come-hebrew-catholics.html)
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Matthew on November 08, 2020, 12:08:46 PM
Nonetheless, Marshall approvingly provides Pope John Paul II’s statement that the “people of Israel” are “the people of the covenant.” Marshall further writes that “the people of Israel continue to be a perpetual eschatological sign of God’s love. They are a reminder that the ‘gifts and calling of God is irrevocable’ (Rom 11:29). The preserving presence of Israel on earth is perhaps the best proof that God exists…”
Whatever Marshall means by these words, they lead to the impression that God still has a covenant with the people of Israel (and perhaps even the state of Israel?).
As a final aside, Marshall has boasted on his website that he himself is of αѕнкenαzι Jєωιѕн ancestry (allegedly only 9.65%).
Certainly, having Jєωιѕн ancestry does not prove that Taylor Marshall’s motives are somehow impure.
What is weird, however, is that Marshall pulled his revelatory post down after it began to circulate on various traditionalist blogs.
Why?
That figures!
Why am I not surprised...
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: dymphnaw on November 08, 2020, 05:11:04 PM
I'm looking forward to Pt. II. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Incredulous on November 08, 2020, 07:13:00 PM


Thank you for this article!


So Taylor Marshall admits he's a Jєω-boy (pretending to be) on a pilgrimage of grace to Catholic tradition.

And we can see it.  After a few beers, his schnoz really stands out.


(https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse3.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.6dfrduLpQ77CvH9_nyHRLQHaFJ%26pid%3DApi&f=1)

That's all we need to know about him.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Matto on November 08, 2020, 09:46:29 PM
We were speaking about Marshall after Mass today. I mentioned this article and I said I don't trust him. But others think he is good. Even Ed, who is cynical. Only I don't trust him. But maybe others will come to my side after reading these articles.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Stanley N on November 08, 2020, 10:53:15 PM
I've only watched one of his videos. He said a lot of correct things, but he also made some mistakes in the theology. Arguably minor, but still mistakes.

He's a former anglican/episcopalian priest converted to Catholicism. He has some credentials but maybe he shouldn't be trying to teach others yet, at least not on the topic of that video.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 03:14:22 AM
I've only watched one of his videos. He said a lot of correct things, but he also made some mistakes in the theology. Arguably minor, but still mistakes.

He's a former anglican/episcopalian priest converted to Catholicism. He has some credentials but maybe he shouldn't be trying to teach others yet, at least not on the topic of that video.
With rare exceptions, converts, especially converts from Judaism, should keep their mouths SHUT and their ears OPEN.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Incredulous on November 09, 2020, 07:13:33 AM
We were speaking about Marshall after Mass today. I mentioned this article and I said I don't trust him. But others think he is good. Even Ed, who is cynical. Only I don't trust him. But maybe others will come to my side after reading these articles.

Your instincts are correct.

In his own media, he's openly embraced Escriva's cult theology and Opus Dei.  

The fact that he's admittedly a Jєω brings it all together.

Church history is littered with Marranos who have done extensive damage to the Catholic Faith from within.

Giovanni Montini, a.k.a., Pope Paul VI... was the consummate example of a modern marrano disaster.

Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Prayerful on November 09, 2020, 05:54:46 PM
Call me jorge bergoglio (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/) isn't a fan. They have a lot on him, but I cannot seem to find their master post, which has a full run down from zionist sympathies, part Jєωιѕн descent, easily getting employment with Opus Dei and so forth. Personally, wanting to make bank from the Faith isn't wholly credible, but not necessarily a conspiracy. Yet some might see a favored 'safe pair of hands' pseudo radical. Not sure I could want into Opus Dei offices and say
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 08:00:16 PM
Call me jorge bergoglio (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/) isn't a fan. They have a lot on him, but I cannot seem to find their master post, which has a full run down from zionist sympathies, part Jєωιѕн descent, easily getting employment with Opus Dei and so forth. Personally, wanting to make bank from the Faith isn't wholly credible, but not necessarily a conspiracy. Yet some might see a favored 'safe pair of hands' pseudo radical. Not sure I could want into Opus Dei offices and say
https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/search/label/Taylor%20Marshall (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/search/label/Taylor%20Marshall)
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 08:10:07 PM
I think this post is a little unfair. The book in question is over a decade old. 

The man seems to have mad a hard shift towards tradition in the past couple of years. Marshall used to be anti-sspx. He now attends an sspx chapel in texas semi-regularly. He used to be anti-Lefebvre. Now he constantly praises him and Michael Davies, and others. 

But people here read a post on a book that's 12 years old and hold him to it. Y'all are acting like a bunch of women. To the women in the group, you might be excused. To the men. Shameful. Clucking about everyone whom you think lesser than yourselves. I admonish you as your brother in Christ. I am not perfect either. 

Ya know. We've dreamt of a time when the masses would turn towards tradition. When people would support the Old Mass and old teachings of Holy Mother Church. Yet it's happening in our lifetime. And people on this forum are finally proving all those people true who for years have called us traditionalist pharisees. Do not be left behind. 

"What good does it do to speak learnedly about the Trinity if, lacking humility, you displease the Trinity? Indeed it is not learning that makes a man holy and just, but a virtuous life makes him pleasing to God. I would rather feel contrition than know how to define it. For what would it profit us to know the whole Bible by heart and the principles of all the philosophers if we live without grace and the love of God? Vanity of vanities and all is vanity, except to love God and serve Him alone."
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 08:18:20 PM
Are these recent enough for you?

March 2020  Marshall interviews John-Henry Westen of LifeSiteNews (co-founded by Opus Dei member) about Francis betraying Catholics in China. Mention of McCarrick is made but no mention that Marshall brought him to Opus Dei’s Catholic Information Center in Washington, D.C. where he spoke about selling out Catholics in Communist China on 25 April 2007 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0u61ZshcBQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0u61ZshcBQ)


• March 2020   Marshall once more interviews Alexander Tschugguel about his recent fight with and recovery from coronavirus  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DSLe6vf1cw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DSLe6vf1cw)  interestingly during the interview Tschugguel and Marshall reveal their conspiring to throw the Pachamama idols into the Tiber River and Mashall paying for Tschugguel's and his friend's airfare to carry out the deed https://youtu.be/_DSLe6vf1cw?t=3999 (https://youtu.be/_DSLe6vf1cw?t=3999) Once again the omissions are signifigant such as the Pachamama idols were in the church of a cardinal who is a strong supporter of Opus Dei. Louie Verrecchio explains how it was nothing more than a marketing ploy in his entry, REVELATION: Dr. Taylor Marshall, ABM, is short https://akacatholic.com/revelation-dr-taylor-marshall-abm-is-short/ (https://akacatholic.com/revelation-dr-taylor-marshall-abm-is-short/) For those who are wondering about Alexander Tschugguel, there is also more than appears to the naked eye. This thread is a good place to start for the curious https://twitter.com/HereIsJorge/status/1191421256123465728 (https://twitter.com/HereIsJorge/status/1191421256123465728)


Lest anyone has a soft spot for Opus JuDei:  http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html (http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html)

Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 08:21:02 PM
Ya know. We've dreamt of a time when the masses would turn towards tradition. When people would support the Old Mass and old teachings of Holy Mother Church. Yet it's happening in our lifetime. And people on this forum are finally proving all those people true who for years have called us traditionalist pharisees. Do not be left behind.
I am not asking anyone to not remain steadfast in protecting what we have received. What I mean here is that the Restoration may not happen as you or I ever envisioned it. If Our Lady is to conquer through the Holy Rosary, it may very well be that she is choosing to do so in her own way. We have the Tradition. Some of us fell right into it seamlessly. Found His Excellency, ABL, heard his truth and that was it. But it doesn't seem to be so for many others. But there is absolutely no doubt that there is a greater interest among Catholics right now in the Traditions they have been robbed of. Instead of pointing out everyone's error alone, how are we reaching out to them to show them the fullness of Truth found in our Holy Religion. 
Frankly, Marshall is pro-(at least not anti)sedevecantist. That means something, to me at least. It means he's a man seeking and who is open to truth. And I'm not a sede. But I appreciate him being willing to listen to the arguments and see people like the late Fr. Chekada as an ALLY. If someone like Marshall can do that, why can't we? 

Pray for me. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 08:23:13 PM
Are these recent enough for you?

March 2020  Marshall interviews John-Henry Westen of LifeSiteNews (co-founded by Opus Dei member) about Francis betraying Catholics in China. Mention of McCarrick is made but no mention that Marshall brought him to Opus Dei’s Catholic Information Center in Washington, D.C. where he spoke about selling out Catholics in Communist China on 25 April 2007 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0u61ZshcBQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0u61ZshcBQ)


• March 2020   Marshall once more interviews Alexander Tschugguel about his recent fight with and recovery from coronavirus  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DSLe6vf1cw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DSLe6vf1cw)  interestingly during the interview Tschugguel and Marshall reveal their conspiring to throw the Pachamama idols into the Tiber River and Mashall paying for Tschugguel's and his friend's airfare to carry out the deed https://youtu.be/_DSLe6vf1cw?t=3999 (https://youtu.be/_DSLe6vf1cw?t=3999) Once again the omissions are signifigant such as the Pachamama idols were in the church of a cardinal who is a strong supporter of Opus Dei. Louie Verrecchio explains how it was nothing more than a marketing ploy in his entry, REVELATION: Dr. Taylor Marshall, ABM, is short https://akacatholic.com/revelation-dr-taylor-marshall-abm-is-short/ (https://akacatholic.com/revelation-dr-taylor-marshall-abm-is-short/) For those who are wondering about Alexander Tschugguel, there is also more than appears to the naked eye. This thread is a good place to start for the curious https://twitter.com/HereIsJorge/status/1191421256123465728 (https://twitter.com/HereIsJorge/status/1191421256123465728)


Lest anyone has a soft spot for Opus JuDei:  http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html (http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html)
First quote: March 2007. Again. That's 13 years ago. Do you not see the point that a man's views can change in that time. Marshall's obviously have, by his own admittance. 
Second quote: I have no idea what you're getting at. They threw the damned Pachamama idol in the river. They recorded it. What did you do? 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 08:24:59 PM
You have missed entirely his recent concealment of the role of Opus JuDei, infiltration that Marshall has concealed.

Nobody is judging his soul, but his affinity for Opus JuDei's "leaven of the Pharisees" is well worth avoiding: http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html (http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html)
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 08:27:01 PM
...., REVELATION: Dr. Taylor Marshall, ABM, is short https://akacatholic.com/revelation-dr-taylor-marshall-abm-is-short/ (https://akacatholic.com/revelation-dr-taylor-marshall-abm-is-short/) ......

A quick look at the article above makes me think it's about a man who disparages Marshall for promoting his own website/channel while he curiously does exactly that which he condemns in Marshall. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 08:29:17 PM
You have missed entirely his recent concealment of the role of Opus JuDei, infiltration that Marshall has concealed.

Nobody is judging his soul, but his affinity for Opus JuDei's "leaven of the Pharisees" is well worth avoiding: http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html (http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html)
I don't know what else to say buddy. He wrote a book. Opened a lot of people's eyes to the horrors in our Church. He didn't do it YOUR way or say everything YOU wanted said so now.... what?
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 08:30:56 PM
I don't know what else to say buddy. He wrote a book. Opened a lot of people's eyes to the horrors in our Church. He didn't do it YOUR way or say everything YOU wanted said so now.... what?
That is your best defense for Marshall still carrying water for Opus JuDei?  http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html (http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html)

After all, even the rabbis and the Jerusalem Post speak of the "horrors in our Church."

That is a low bar.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 08:33:52 PM
http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html (http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html)

Do you own stock in this website? You sure seem to reference it incessantly. Why all the link-backs? 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 08:36:03 PM

After all, even the rabbis and the Jerusalem Post speak of the "horrors in our Church."

That is a low bar.
I'm not defending anything. You're pointing out an error of omission, in your opinion. I'm showing the good this man has done for the Church, asking us to recognize that we are not all perfect and can change, and not everyone who is an ally will see eye-to-eye with us. That's it. I'm no Marshall apologist. I see that he has done good for the Church and support him for that much. I would do the same for you or anyone else. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 08:37:01 PM
That is your best defense for Marshall still carrying water for Opus JuDei?  http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html (http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html)

After all, even the rabbis and the Jerusalem Post speak of the "horrors in our Church."

That is a low bar.
Also, you didn't respond to my post. But if you don't want to, that's okay. I think I can understand why. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 08:37:15 PM
Do you own stock in this website? You sure seem to reference it incessantly. Why all the link-backs?
Non-responsive.
Please have the integrity to deal with the content.
(http://judaism.is (http://judaism.is) is my site!)
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 08:40:22 PM
Non-responsive.
Please have the integrity to deal with the content.
(http://judaism.is (http://judaism.is) is my site!)
I did respond. 

This makes sense now. You are looking for traffic to your site. You use Cathinfo to do so. If someone (Marshall) doesn't conform to the reality your site provides, they are anathema. Simple enough.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 08:41:08 PM
I'm not defending anything. You're pointing out an error of omission, in your opinion. I'm showing the good this man has done for the Church, asking us to recognize that we are not all perfect and can change, and not everyone who is an ally will see eye-to-eye with us. That's it. I'm no Marshall apologist. I see that he has done good for the Church and support him for that much. I would do the same for you or anyone else.
It may not be your judgment, but it is certainly my judgment that (1) a long affiliation with kabbalistic sodomite Opus Dei and (2) continuing to conceal kabbalistic sodomite Opus Dei infiltration (while pointing fingers elsewhere) is not "an error of omission," a veritable misdirection, that should be overlooked or absolved.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 08:44:11 PM
I did respond.

This makes sense now. You are looking for traffic to your site. You use Cathinfo to do so. If someone (Marshall) doesn't conform to the reality your site provides, they are anathema. Simple enough.
No.  You have not responded to the matter of kabbalistic sodomite Opus Dei and Marshall still carrying water for them.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 08:47:10 PM
09/11/2020Have a good night Mark. (by the way your questions are misleading and assume too much. I'm too stupid to remember what logical fallacy that is called).
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 08:53:02 PM
Here is my initial post critical of Marshall:
In Chapter 3 of his book Salvation is from the Jєωs (https://books.google.com/books?id=dXmSDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Salvation+is+from+the+Jєωs&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjBkYCQirjiAhVDVK0KHSC-D-oQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q&f=false), Roy Schoeman advises that Jєωs should leaven the Church like yeast (https://books.google.com/books?id=dXmSDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Salvation+is+from+the+Jєωs&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjBkYCQirjiAhVDVK0KHSC-D-oQ6AEIKDAA#v=snippet&q=yeast&f=false). Schoeman contradicts God’s repeated and emphatic warnings to “beware the leaven of the Pharisees” (Matthew 16:6 (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=47&ch=16&l=6#x), 16:11 (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=47&ch=16&l=11#x), 16:12 (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=47&ch=16&l=12#x), Mark 8:15 (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=48&ch=8&l=15#x), Luke 12:1 (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=49&ch=12&l=1#x)). Sadly, Taylor Marshal is oblivious to such subversion:
Here Come the Hebrew Catholics https://taylormarshall.com/2010/10/here-come-hebrew-catholics.html (https://taylormarshall.com/2010/10/here-come-hebrew-catholics.html)
My subsequent criticisms of Marshall center on the same issue, "the leaven of the Pharisees," specifically kabbalistic sodomite Opus Dei and Marshall still carrying water for them.

What "logical fallacy" covers Judaizing subversion and perversion?
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 09:01:02 PM
Here is my initial post critical of Marshall:My subsequent criticisms of Marshall center on the same issue, "the leaven of the Pharisees," specifically kabbalistic sodomite Opus Dei and Marshall still carrying water for them.

What "logical fallacy" covers Judaizing subversion and perversion?
Ya know there are a ton of people who quote Chesterton's old works and call him a heretic. The man went from atheist to Catholic, in the end. Unfortunately that last point is lost on many and they quote his old works as if they held the same weight as his last ones. 
...
https://taylormarshall.com/2010/10/here-come-hebrew-catholics.html (https://taylormarshall.com/2010/10/here-come-hebrew-catholics.html)
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 09:07:20 PM
Ya know there are a ton of people who quote Chesterton's old works and call him a heretic. The man went from atheist to Catholic, in the end. Unfortunately that last point is lost on many and they quote his old works as if they held the same weight as his last ones.
...
https://taylormarshall.com/2010/10/here-come-hebrew-catholics.html (https://taylormarshall.com/2010/10/here-come-hebrew-catholics.html)
What part of "still carrying water for them" didn't you understand?

Quote
March 2020   … Once again the omissions are signifigant such as the Pachamama idols were in the church of a cardinal who is a strong supporter of Opus Dei.
I'd have a very different opinion of Marshall if he stopped his misdirection away from and abjured kabbalistic sodomite Opus Dei.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 09:10:32 PM
What part of "still carrying water for them" didn't you understand?
I'd have a very different opinion of Marshall if he stopped his misdirection away from and abjured kabbalistic sodomite Opus Dei.
Please go back and read my original few posts on the subject. I think you've missed my point completely. We're arguing in circles. (not arguing a point which you believe to be true does not constitute carrying water for someone.) 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 09:25:29 PM
I complained about Marshall's history of Judaizing.
You complained that the criticisms of Marshall are in the past.
I pointed out that in 2020 he is still concealing Opus JuDei's nefarious activity.

It is you who misses the point—Marshall's concealment of the kabbalistic sodomite Judaizers (while hypocritcally pointing fingers about "infiltration") is not only in the past but also in 2020.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Incredulous on November 09, 2020, 09:42:23 PM
Opus Dei trolls... are you listening?

We trad Catholics challenge you to create a Trad media pundit that we cannot debunk as a fraud?

You’ve got complete media dominance with unlimited resources. Why can’t you do it?

Voris, Schneider, Matt, Taylor and more...

You’ve failed repeatedly because you’re a natural enemy of Jesus Christ and our Holy religion.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 09:44:09 PM
I complained about Marshall's history of Judaizing.
You complained that the criticisms of Marshall are in the past.
I pointed out that in 2020 he is still concealing Opus JuDei's nefarious activity.

It is you who misses the point—Marshall's concealment of the kabbalistic sodomite Judaizers (while hypocritcally pointing fingers about "infiltration") is not only in the past but also in 2020.
I think the difference is you "assume" he is concealing. It's not hypocritical to point fingers of Church infiltrators and not point out every single infiltration/evil-group in the Church. Marshall has not actively denied Opus Dei being an evil organization. 

And even if he did- he hasn't in recent years to my knowledge- that would not mean that he is somehow evil/ malicious/ or nefarious himself, as you indicate when you say he's [actively] concealing. If you're an honest man, you have to admit room for the fact that one of the following is a possibility:
(1)may just not agree with you. 
(2)he hasn't seen the evidence you've seen
(3)you're wrong. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 09:53:40 PM
Opus Dei trolls... are you listening?

We trad Catholics challenge you to create a Trad media pundit that we cannot debunk as a fraud?

You’ve got complete media dominance with unlimited resources. Why can’t you do it?

Voris, Schneider, Matt, Taylor and more...

You’ve failed repeatedly because you’re a natural enemy of Jesus Christ and our Holy religion.
May God bless you. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: josefamenendez on November 09, 2020, 10:03:31 PM
Taylor Marshall single handedly destroyed  traditional  Fisher More College. That was within the past few years. Look it up
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: josefamenendez on November 09, 2020, 10:08:18 PM
 Home (https://akacatholic.com/)

Blog Post (https://akacatholic.com/category/blog/)

Taylor Marshall weighs in on FMC

Taylor Marshall weighs in on FMC
 Louie (https://akacatholic.com/author/louie/)  March 4, 2014  203 Comments (https://akacatholic.com/taylor-marshall-weighs-in-on-fmc/#comments)
Dr. Taylor Marshall has broken his silence to share his reasons for leaving Fisher More College and to weigh-in on Bishop Olson’s recent decision to forbid celebration of the traditional Mass in the college’s chapel.
In a FaceBook (https://www.facebook.com/DrTaylorMarshall/posts/400180263452671) post today, Dr. Marshall offers the following allegations as indicative of the “serious pastoral problems” at FMC:
1. Mr. King, president of FMC, refused to disassociate himself from a faculty member who made public statements suggesting that Vatican II is invalid.
2. Financial mismanagement on the part of Mr. King.
3. FMC hosted a “public repudiation of Vatican II and the Ordinary Form.”
4. Mr. King would not allow the so-called “Ordinary Form” to be celebrated at the college.
5. Mr. King “contracted an irregular / suspended” priest.
Let’s review each one with some common sense observations and questions, of which there are many.
1. Does Dr. Marshall mean to say “disassociate the college and its curriculum?” If not, this sounds like a private matter. If so, it would make sense that the bishop would feel compelled to act. Even the SSPX recognizes Vatican II as valid in that it met the canonical requirements of an ecuмenical council, even as its text suffers from any number of serious flaws.
Assuming that he did mean “the college” and not just Mr. King personally, one cannot help but consider the various “Catholic” colleges throughout the nation that routinely teach flat out heresy and yet suffer no censure whatsoever. I digress.
2. Internal financial considerations are institutional matters for trustees and board members to address.
3. What is meant by “repudiation” of the Council and the Novus Ordo? If it means questioning validity, that invites the bishop’s attention. If it means pointing out very real and serious flaws in each, that’s another story.
4. Apart from someone demanding a celebration of the Novus Ordo in the college chapel, this lack of permission would not be known. Given the nature of the college, this causes one to wonder who has been requesting it and why.  Was someone doing so to intentionally agitate matters? Too many questions remain.
5.  How does Dr. Marshall know that the “contracted priest” in question is suspended? Was he contracted to teach and lecture, or to celebrate the sacraments? Again, more questions remain than answers.
Getting to the crux of the matter, Dr. Marshall makes a mistake when he concludes:
Quote
Regarding Summorum Pontificuм in this situation. It doesn’t apply here since the college chapel does not have a priest requesting to say the Latin Mass and the chapel therefore falls under the direct pastoral control of the bishop.
[color][size][font][size][font]
There is no need whatsoever for a priest to “request the Latin Mass.” It is enough simply for a priest to wish to offer it. Period. That’s the entire point of Summorum Pontificuм.
As for the chapel falling under the bishop’s pastoral control, fine, but based upon Summorum Pontificuм, or more properly speaking, the Instruction Universae Ecclesia (http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_commissions/ecclsdei/docuмents/rc_com_ecclsdei_doc_20110430_istr-universae-ecclesiae_en.html), that control only allows for him to restrict the traditional Mass under the following condition:
[/font][/size][/font][/size][/color]
Quote
The faithful who ask for the celebration of the forma extraordinaria must not in any way support or belong to groups which show themselves to be against the validity or legitimacy of the Holy Mass or the Sacraments celebrated in the forma ordinaria or against the Roman Pontiff as Supreme Pastor of the Universal Church. (Article 19)
[color][size][font][size][font]
It would seem to me that the worst case scenario at Fisher More, based on all that has been shared, is that Bishop Olson has reason to suspect that Mr. King and at least one of his faculty members is “against the validity of the forma ordinaria and/or the Roman Pontiff.”
A reasonable reading of Summorum Pontificuм and Universae Ecclesia would seem to indicate that this alone is not enough to deprive the entire college community of the traditional Mass; rather, it would seem fairly obvious that the intent of UE 19 concerns groups that are organized in opposition to papal authority and the validity of the forma ordinaria. Otherwise, we must believe that one rotten apple is enough to put an end to the traditional Mass in any given community. Clearly, that’s not what the instruction is encouraging.
That being the case, a more prudent action on Bishop Olson’s part would have been to request in writing a statement from the college as to its official position as an institution, while addressing any remaining problems with specific individuals directly. Taking the traditional Mass away is a severe action, not an initial step.
As it stands, Bishop Olson is depriving the entire college community of a celebration of the Roman Rite that is rightfully theirs as faithful Catholics. It is difficult to reconcile this action with the appropriate esteem for the traditional liturgy that we rightly expect of our bishops, as opposed to merely tolerating it on a limited basis.
[/font][/size][/font][/size][/color]
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 10:14:18 PM
....
In a FaceBook (https://www.facebook.com/DrTaylorMarshall/posts/400180263452671) post today.....


2014. 
its 2020. 

Marshall has changed his views, publicly. He has apologized, publicly, for times he has spoken out against SSPX and their priests. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 10:16:49 PM
Taylor Marshall single handedly destroyed  traditional  Fisher More College. That was within the past few years. Look it up
I know about FMC. I know people, personal friends, where affected negatively by it. I know also that, as I just mentioned above, Marshall has publicly renounced his former views on the SSPX, which led to the demise of FMC, at that time. 

Yall are having a real hard time finding recent information that is damning to Marshall. I mean, I don't even personally agree with Marshall on everything, and yet, here I am having to defend the man for the sake of truth and clarity. Yeesh. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 10:40:24 PM
We have posted and linked detailed timelines of his activities, including evidence of his intimate connections with kabbalistic sodomite Opus JuDei for decades. He has published a book on infiltration, but the single key lacuna is his omission of Opus JuDei from his exposé.

We have posted numerous recent situations, as recently as March 2020, in which Marshall continues to cavort with Opus JuDei operatives. Despite those recent opportunities, Marshall has neither abjured his connections to Opus JuDei nor has he exposed Opus JuDei infiltrators.

And you expect us to believe that his decades of Opus JuDei affiliations and his omission of exposing Opus JuDei infiltration, kabbalism, and sodomy is just an accident. He accidentally didn't notice the operations of those with whom he was intimate for decades??? We call that a "cohencidence," no accidental oversight at all.

(http://judaism.is/images/definition%20denial.jpg?crc=299446342)
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 10:48:13 PM
Life Pro Tip: don't be the smartest guy you know. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Donachie on November 09, 2020, 10:58:27 PM
in old Spain they used to say there are three ways to waste water, to mix it with wine, to throw it in the sea, to baptize a Jєω. i'm not trying to be an "αnтι-ѕємιтє" but i see things can be strange in the ways of confusion
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 11:05:36 PM
Life Pro Tip: don't be the smartest guy you know.
Non-responsive.

You have inaccurately (dishonestly?) insisted that Marshall's Opus JuDei connections are only in the past. You have tied yourself in knots to avoid admitting that as recently as March 2020 he had a perfect opportunity to reveal that the Pachamama idolatry occurred in the church of an Opus JuDei operative. Marshall was involved in that affair, but did not reveal the connection with his beloved Opus JuDei.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Nadir on November 09, 2020, 11:17:54 PM
It’s strange that Taylor Marshall, in his latest “Infiltration the plot to destroy the Church from within” c 2019, has hardly a word about the Jєωs, in particular about their role in Vat 2, my husband tells me. I’m about half way through know right now. Anybody else read it?
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 11:28:13 PM
I've already stated my case. The facts are what they are. You focus on what you perceived him to fail to do or mention. I focus on what he actually did.  I believe my case is far stronger as it deals with the facts, as they are amd for what they are: good and eye opening for many Catholics. I see your argument as one which throws the baby out with the bathwater. "He didn't do it my way." 

Well, son, in this world there are doers. People who make a positive difference in the Church. Who are the cause of many conversions to the One Holy Catholic Faith. Who lift the blinders of so many Catholics once unable to see the counterfeit church for what it is. 

And then there are finger pointers. As the restoration of Holy Mother Church comes to fruition, they will stay in the swamp with the likes of fake monks Mikey and Pete Dimond; fake bishop Pfeiffer; a priestless Mr. Gibson's community; etc. Etc. Etc.  
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 11:30:49 PM
It’s strange that Taylor Marshall, in his latest “Infiltration the plot to destroy the Church from within” c 2019, has hardly a word about the Jєωs, in particular about their role in Vat 2, my husband tells me. I’m about half way through know right now. Anybody else read it?
As a Catholic in the traditional movement for many years I found it hard to read. It was redundant and incomplete, yes. But my whole argument here is that when you contrast it with his position only a few years earlier- I mean only two or so- it gives one a lot of hope for Marshall that he may continue to be "red-pilled" to the countless other issues at hand..
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 11:39:18 PM
I've already stated my case. The facts are what they are. You focus on what you perceived him to fail to do or mention. I focus on what he actually did.  I believe my case is far stronger as it deals with the facts, as they are amd for what they are: good and eye opening for many Catholics. I see your argument as one which throws the baby out with the bathwater. "He didn't do it my way."

Well, son, in this world there are doers. People who make a positive difference in the Church. Who are the cause of many conversions to the One Holy Catholic Faith. Who lift the blinders of so many Catholics once unable to see the counterfeit church for what it is.

And then there are finger pointers. As the restoration of Holy Mother Church comes to fruition, they will stay in the swamp with the likes of fake monks Mikey and Pete Dimond; fake bishop Pfeiffer; a priestless Mr. Gibson's community; etc. Etc. Etc.  

As if Judas' skilled keeping of the Apostle's purse demands that we neither notice nor mention his treachery, "Dad"?
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 11:42:24 PM
As a Catholic in the traditional movement for many years I found it hard to read. It was redundant and incomplete, yes. But my whole argument here is that when you contrast it with his position only a few years earlier- I mean only two or so- it gives one a lot of hope for Marshall that he may continue to be "red-pilled" to the countless other issues at hand..

Actually, your "whole argument" is that it is insignificant that Marshall is still in 2020 carrying water for kabbalistic sodomite Opus JuDei.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 11:46:06 PM
Actually, your "whole argument" is that it is insignificant that Marshall is still in 2020 carrying water for kabbalistic sodomite Opus JuDei.
No its not. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 11:47:08 PM
As if Judas' skilled keeping of the Apostle's purse demands that we neither notice nor mention his treachery, "Dad"?
No son. Gonna have to whip ya if you keep being hard headed though. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 11:49:36 PM
No its not.

Hilarious, "Dad."

You have spent the last few hours insisting—against the evidence—that his Opus Judei affiliations are in the "past" and that we should neither notice nor mention his ongoing concealment of kabbalistic sodomite Opus JuDei operations.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 11:52:35 PM
No son. Gonna have to whip ya if you keep being hard headed though.

Hilarious still, "Dad."

You have spent hours tonight harping that Marshall has done so much that you think is good, we should neither notice nor criticize his decades of ongoing support for and concealment of kabbalistic sodomite Opus JuDei and their operatives with whom he still maintains intimate contact and whom he still promotes.

Judas did a great job of keeping the Apostles' purse. Why then would we ever criticize Judas?
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 11:54:00 PM
Hilarious, "Dad."

You have spent the last few hours insisting—against the evidence—that his Opus Judei affiliations are in the "past" and that we should neither notice nor mention his ongoing concealment of kabbalistic sodomite Opus JuDei operations.
My whole point is that you have no irrefutable proof that he is "actively" doing this. At best - And this is a stretch- is that you assume. There's no irrefutable proof ("evidence"). We ain't gonna just take your word for it. And the "evidence" is in the fruit of his good works. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 11:55:04 PM
Hilarious still, "Dad."

You have spent hours tonight harping that Marshall has done so much that you think is good, we should neither notice nor criticize his decades of ongoing support for and concealment of kabbalistic sodomite Opus JuDei.

Judas did a great job of keeping the Apostles' purse. Why then would we ever criticize Judas?
I've spent hours typing responses to a man who spent more than days making a website he incessantly links back to and expects all to just agree with?
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 09, 2020, 11:55:58 PM
Judas did a great job of keeping the Apostles' purse. Why then would we ever criticize Judas?
Paul persecuted Christians. Why would we ever follow him?
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 09, 2020, 11:59:33 PM
My whole point is that you have no irrefutable proof that he is "actively" doing this. At best - And this is a stretch- is that you assume. There's no irrefutable proof ("evidence"). We ain't gonna just take your word for it. And the "evidence" is in the fruit of his good works.

It requires his free will to do what he has done. That is "active."

Your peculiar usage of "active" would require us to read hearts, minds, and souls in order to identify any "active" deed.

By your non-Catholic usage, nobody could observe anything objective about any external action of any person, murderers and adulterers in flagrante delicto  included.

As I said, you are twisting yourself in knots to deny what is manifest: Marshall still consorts with and conceals kabbalistic sodomite Opus Judei and its operatives.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 10, 2020, 12:01:50 AM
Paul persecuted Christians. Why would we ever follow him?
Paul publicly abjured and repented his persecution.

Marshall has neither publicly abjured nor repented kabbalistic sodomite Opus JuDei. Quite the contrary, Marshall persists.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 10, 2020, 12:02:28 AM

Your peculiar usage of "active" would require us to read hearts, minds, and souls in order to identify any "active" deed.
Active: throwing pachamama in the river. 
Non-active: "not" mentioning a detail you found important. 
It may very well be important. But the fact is is that it was an omission. You do indeed act as if to read minds and hearts. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 10, 2020, 12:04:29 AM
Paul publicly abjured and repented his persecution.

Ha! I have mentioned many times that Marshall has apologized publically. He just didn't reach out to Mark76 on Cathinfo to make a specific adjuration. I see the problem now. 
I'm done for tonight. Dunno if I'd look forward to more of this go- nowhere conversation to be honest. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 10, 2020, 12:06:25 AM
Active: throwing pachamama in the river.
Non-active: "not" mentioning a detail you found important.
It may very well be important. But the fact is is that it was an omission. You do indeed act as if to read minds and hearts.

Marshall actively wrote a book about infiltration and did not expose the infiltration by those with whom he was most intimate.

Marshall continues to actively consort with and promote Opus JuDei operatives.

Manifest matters. Just another cohencidence.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 10, 2020, 12:10:17 AM
Ha! I have mentioned many times that Marshall has apologized publically. He just didn't reach out to Mark76 on Cathinfo to make a specific adjuration. I see the problem now.
I'm done for tonight. Dunno if I'd look forward to more of this go- nowhere conversation to be honest.
Please quote Marshall's apology for Judaizing.
Please quote Marshall's apology for consorting with and promoting kabbalistic sodomite Opus JuDei.
Please quote Marshall's apology for concealing the role of Opus Judei in the Pachamama idolatry.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 10, 2020, 12:14:57 AM
I've spent hours typing responses to a man who spent more than days making a website he incessantly links back to and expects all to just agree with?
So… it is laudable that Marshall still promotes kabbalistic sodomite Opus JuDei, but blameworthy that for decades I have assembled evidence against the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan, the most organized earthly opposition to Jesus Christ?

Let all take note.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Nadir on November 10, 2020, 04:42:55 AM
Paul persecuted Christians. Why would we ever follow him?
Because Paul sincerely repented and completely turned away from his evil ways. Paul became an apostle of Jesus, while Judas went to keep company with the father of lies. Do you understand?
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Incredulous on November 10, 2020, 05:00:54 AM
Taylor Marshall single handedly destroyed  traditional  Fisher More College. That was within the past few years. Look it up
“The poor little Jєω.”
:laugh1:
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Pax Vobis on November 10, 2020, 08:08:15 AM
How did a former episcopal pastor become Chancellor at a Catholic University?  Is he also a lawyer?
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Stanley N on November 10, 2020, 08:17:17 AM
How did a former episcopal pastor become Chancellor at a Catholic University?  Is he also a lawyer?

Chancellor is not a specifically legal role.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Pax Vobis on November 10, 2020, 08:21:38 AM
Ok, maybe it's academic.  But how does an Episopalian-not-catholic-trained person end up as Chancellor of a supposed orthodox college?  What sense does that make?  What person in power put Marshall there, and why?
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Stanley N on November 10, 2020, 08:31:31 AM
What sense does that make?

He had been catholic for a few years by that time. It was a small college, probably few faculty.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 10, 2020, 08:32:56 AM
Ok, maybe it's academic.  But how does an Episopalian-not-catholic-trained person end up as Chancellor of a supposed orthodox college?  What sense does that make?  What person in power put Marshall there, and why?
Bishop Williamson is also a convert to Catholicism. St. John Newman as well. My understanding is he converted, then went on to get his Doctoral degree in philosophy at the catholic college, University of Dallas where he focused on scholastic philosophy. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: josefamenendez on November 10, 2020, 08:58:14 AM
I know about FMC. I know people, personal friends, where affected negatively by it. I know also that, as I just mentioned above, Marshall has publicly renounced his former views on the SSPX, which led to the demise of FMC, at that time.

Yall are having a real hard time finding recent information that is damning to Marshall. I mean, I don't even personally agree with years ago, and noMarshall on everything, and yet, here I am having to defend the man for the sake of truth and clarity. Yeesh.
Yes 2014, and after crushing tradition in a Catholic college 6 years ago he is now the standard bearer and go-to guy for tradition? Why don't you ask Mr King what he thinks? All better now?
I guess humility and repentance are a thing of the past for you. There is no good reason to trust self aggrandizing Taylor Marshall (and his " Magnum Opus" book is REALLY poorly written for a PhD lacking significant footnotes or citing appropriate sources (Wikipedia?)). He may very well be co-intellpro or at least a sayanim. I think it would be important to follow the money with this guy. Why didn't he shut up about his association with the pachymama situation? He just HAD to come out and crow about his involvement . Humility much? The pachymama situation is very fishy indeed with him in the mix. It no longer seems like an organic, righteous christian action, but a thoroughly staged event for personal accolades and maybe a lot more.
In a world where perception trumps truth , Mr Marshall fits in nicely.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 10, 2020, 09:02:05 AM
…My understanding is [Marshall] converted, then went on to get his Doctoral degree in philosophy at the catholic college, University of Dallas where he focused on scholastic philosophy.

…and worked—and in 2020 still works—intimately with kabbalistic sodomite Opus JuDei operatives:
https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/search/label/Taylor%20Marshall (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/search/label/Taylor%20Marshall)
http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html (http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html)

Please quote Marshall's apology for Judaizing.
Please quote Marshall's apology for consorting with and promoting kabbalistic sodomite Opus JuDei.
Please quote Marshall's apology for concealing the role of Opus Judei in the Pachamama idolatry.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Pax Vobis on November 10, 2020, 09:09:29 AM
Marshall converted 5 years before his philosophy degree, then a year later, became Chancellor.  So 6 years of being "catholic" from a novus ordo training is sufficient for being Chancellor at a Catholic university?  He was also on the Board at the university...who put him there?  Just seems fishy and/or imprudent by the university officials.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: andy on November 10, 2020, 09:48:50 AM
One little detail regarding the name "New Saint Thomas Institute". Why to combine "New" and "Saint Thomas" in a single title? Besides it sounds like an oxymoron. What "new" means here?
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Matthew on November 10, 2020, 09:56:06 AM
Marshall converted 5 years before his philosophy degree, then a year later, became Chancellor.  So 6 years of being "catholic" from a novus ordo training is sufficient for being Chancellor at a Catholic university?  He was also on the Board at the university...who put him there?  Just seems fishy and/or imprudent by the university officials.
This is my point as well. Are there no experienced trads, that we need to rush new converts into high-profile teaching and spokesman positions?
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Pax Vobis on November 10, 2020, 10:26:54 AM
Quote
Are there no experienced trads, that we need to rush new converts into high-profile teaching and spokesman positions?

Ultimately, the problem is that the University wasn't Trad.  So, typical novus ordo mgmt sees the "glamour" of Dr Marshall's resume (doctorate in philosophy, and whatever other episcopalian degrees) and since he's well-spoken, they hire him.  Any University that calls the TLM the 'extraordinary form' and bows to the wishes of the local diocese was never going to hire any Trads anyway.  But still, this university could've done some good, for those young adults who would've learned something orthodox.  Pretty telling that the university failed over a real estate deal; sounds like the professors were duped by some financial "expert" they trusted and he torpedoed the school.  Inside job.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 10, 2020, 10:48:42 AM
About Marshall's Judaizing.

In enthusing about "Hebrew Catholics" Marshall made the claim: "I did not observe any so-called 'Judaizing' or appeals to become a 'Jєωιѕн Church within a Church.'" Here Come the Hebrew Catholics by Taylor Marshall https://taylormarshall.com/2010/10/here-come-hebrew-catholics.html (https://taylormarshall.com/2010/10/here-come-hebrew-catholics.html)

Yeah, he "did not observe."

Somehow Marshall "perceived a deep love for traditional liturgy," yet "did not observe" and still has not observed that Hebrew Catholics have altered the Canon of the "traditional" Mass to include тαℓмυdic formulae, the Kiddush and Motzi, preceding the Consecration. Hebrew Catholics Follow Their Own Church by Donald Snyder, Forward, April 15, 2009 https://forward.com/news/104859/hebrew-catholics-follow-their-own-church/ (https://forward.com/news/104859/hebrew-catholics-follow-their-own-church/)

Somehow Marshall "did not observe" that the Hebrew Catholic bookstore sells a "holy" card portraying both Jesus and Mary as тαℓмυdic Jєωs, complete with barbed wire and a "Jude" patch. "Hebrew-Catholics" change agents steeped in тαℓмυdic Master Race pride–Hebrew Catholics make up a false religion of their own contrivances and the rabbis http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/10/hebrew-catholics-make-up-false-religion.html (http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/10/hebrew-catholics-make-up-false-religion.html)

Somehow Marshall "did not observe" that the Hebrew Catholics continue to practice damned тαℓмυdic rites, including seders. Hebrew Catholic seder liturgy https://www.hebrewcatholic.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/AHC-Haggadah-Draft-9-spread.pdf (https://www.hebrewcatholic.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/AHC-Haggadah-Draft-9-spread.pdf),

Somehow Marshall "did not observe" that some Hebrew Catholics, including one Jesuit Hebrew Catholic priest, express their intent to be buried in Jєωιѕн cemeteries by rabbis according to тαℓмυdic rites. Hebrew Catholics Follow Their Own Church by Donald Snyder, Forward, April 15, 2009 https://forward.com/news/104859/hebrew-catholics-follow-their-own-church/ (https://forward.com/news/104859/hebrew-catholics-follow-their-own-church/)

Somehow Marshall "did not observe" that the Hebrew Catholics promote "a real respect for [тαℓмυdic] Jєωs as they see themselves, and we follow the Jєωιѕн liturgical calendar and observe many of their holidays, like Sukkot and Hanukkah." Hebrew Catholics Follow Their Own Church by Donald Snyder, Forward, April 15, 2009 https://forward.com/news/104859/hebrew-catholics-follow-their-own-church/ (https://forward.com/news/104859/hebrew-catholics-follow-their-own-church/)

Somehow Marshall "did not observe" Cantate Domino. http://judaism.is/marranos.html (http://judaism.is/marranos.html)

All of Marshall's inverted powers of observation are consistent with the deceptions of Escriv(b)a, Marrano, Kabbalist, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, servant of the ѕуηαgσgυє, and his subversive Opus JuDei.

Rather than apologizing, repenting, and making reparation for any of his Judaizing deceits, Marshall continues to consort with and conceal the operations of Opus JuDei.

Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: roscoe on November 10, 2020, 11:54:39 AM
TM Podcast on YTube starts in 5 Mins... :popcorn:
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 10, 2020, 11:56:09 AM
This is my point as well. Are there no experienced trads, that we need to rush new converts into high-profile teaching and spokesman positions?
You have to remember these aren't SSPX trads. They're "NO" trads , if you will. So yeah, there are better people but they chose Marshall for the reasons Pax Vobis mentioned. A bad move. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 10, 2020, 12:02:13 PM
You have to remember these aren't SSPX trads. They're "NO" trads , if you will. So yeah, there are better people but they chose Marshall for the reasons Pax Vobis mentioned. A bad move.
You claimed that Marshall had apologized for his transgressions.
Where are the apologies? Quote the apologies, for example, for these:


About Marshall's Judaizing.

In enthusing about "Hebrew Catholics" Marshall made the claim: "I did not observe any so-called 'Judaizing' or appeals to become a 'Jєωιѕн Church within a Church.'" Here Come the Hebrew Catholics by Taylor Marshall https://taylormarshall.com/2010/10/here-come-hebrew-catholics.html (https://taylormarshall.com/2010/10/here-come-hebrew-catholics.html)

Yeah, he "did not observe."

Somehow Marshall "perceived a deep love for traditional liturgy," yet "did not observe" and still has not observed that Hebrew Catholics have altered the Canon of the "traditional" Mass to include тαℓмυdic formulae, the Kiddush and Motzi, preceding the ConsecrationHebrew Catholics Follow Their Own Church by Donald Snyder, Forward, April 15, 2009 https://forward.com/news/104859/hebrew-catholics-follow-their-own-church/ (https://forward.com/news/104859/hebrew-catholics-follow-their-own-church/)

Somehow Marshall "did not observe" that the Hebrew Catholic bookstore sells a "holy" card portraying both Jesus and Mary as тαℓмυdic Jєωs, complete with barbed wire and a "Jude" patch. "Hebrew-Catholics" change agents steeped in тαℓмυdic Master Race pride–Hebrew Catholics make up a false religion of their own contrivances and the rabbis http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/10/hebrew-catholics-make-up-false-religion.html (http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/10/hebrew-catholics-make-up-false-religion.html)

Somehow Marshall "did not observe" that the Hebrew Catholics continue to practice damned тαℓмυdic rites, including sedersHebrew Catholic seder liturgy https://www.hebrewcatholic.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/AHC-Haggadah-Draft-9-spread.pdf (https://www.hebrewcatholic.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/AHC-Haggadah-Draft-9-spread.pdf),

Somehow Marshall "did not observe" that some Hebrew Catholics, including one Jesuit Hebrew Catholic priest, express their intent to be buried in Jєωιѕн cemeteries by rabbis according to тαℓмυdic ritesHebrew Catholics Follow Their Own Church by Donald Snyder, Forward, April 15, 2009 https://forward.com/news/104859/hebrew-catholics-follow-their-own-church/ (https://forward.com/news/104859/hebrew-catholics-follow-their-own-church/)

Somehow Marshall "did not observe" that the Hebrew Catholics promote "a real respect for [тαℓмυdic] Jєωs as they see themselves, and we follow the Jєωιѕн liturgical calendar and observe many of their holidays, like Sukkot and Hanukkah." Hebrew Catholics Follow Their Own Church by Donald Snyder, Forward, April 15, 2009 https://forward.com/news/104859/hebrew-catholics-follow-their-own-church/ (https://forward.com/news/104859/hebrew-catholics-follow-their-own-church/)

Somehow Marshall "did not observe" Cantate Dominohttp://judaism.is/marranos.html (http://judaism.is/marranos.html)

All of Marshall's inverted powers of observation are consistent with the deceptions of Escriv(b)a, Marrano, Kabbalist, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, servant of the ѕуηαgσgυє, and his subversive Opus JuDei.

Rather than apologizing, repenting, and making reparation for any of his Judaizing deceits, Marshall continues to consort with and conceal the operations of Opus JuDei.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: choakley on November 10, 2020, 12:03:51 PM
I never liked Taylor Marshall. He emanates "career Catholicism".
Btw, "Novus Ordo trad" is an oxymoron.

Mark79 shows evidence of TM's constant judaizing.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 10, 2020, 12:24:00 PM
You claimed that Marshall had apologized for his transgressions.
Where are the apologies? Quote the apologies, for example, for these:
Catholic Identity Conference 2019
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Stubborn on November 10, 2020, 12:34:08 PM
You have to remember these aren't SSPX trads. They're "NO" trads , if you will.
NO trads are often referred to as simply, "conservatives".
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 10, 2020, 12:35:06 PM
NO trads are often referred to as simply, "conservatives".
Cool. Let's add it to the trad wiki. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Stubborn on November 10, 2020, 12:39:13 PM
Cool. Let's add it to the trad wiki.
Whatever, just be sure to remove "NO" trads.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 10, 2020, 12:45:25 PM
Whatever, just be sure to remove "NO" trads.
Yes comrade. We must keep the agitprop in sync. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Stubborn on November 10, 2020, 12:58:22 PM
Yes comrade. We must keep the agitprop in sync.
I have no idea who TM is, never listened to him, wouldn't know him if I ran into him, but from skimming this thread he sounds like a typical conservative.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: s2srea on November 10, 2020, 01:06:57 PM
I have no idea who TM is, never listened to him, wouldn't know him if I ran into him, but from skimming this thread he sounds like a typical conservative.
He pretty much is. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Incredulous on November 10, 2020, 07:38:03 PM


s2srea,

It's understandable to like TM. 

He's in on a the latest trad events, he's polished and has good stuff, (probably hand fed to him by his Opus Dei script writers).

I've always thought this with the Dimond brothers, that they are fed material from a judaic ghost writers team.  (Stock & trade of the Revolution),

It's just, as you know, that on this forum, we're a little thick skinned.  We've studied the betrayals to tradition for too many years.

It is hard to cut TM any slack because of his Protestant, Opus Dei and judaic connections.

I hope he dies in a state of grace and goes to Heaven, but I'm not following him for Trad topics. 

Can't help but think he'd be prone to betray Tradition, like so many others have.

Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Cera on November 10, 2020, 07:55:00 PM
Those who don't like him don't have to watch him. What DO you read/ watch for breaking Catholic News? Life Site News? But they have Mother Miriam, so you wouldn't like them either. CathInfo? Please.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: josefamenendez on November 10, 2020, 08:04:16 PM
Ultimately, the problem is that the University wasn't Trad.  So, typical novus ordo mgmt sees the "glamour" of Dr Marshall's resume (doctorate in philosophy, and whatever other episcopalian degrees) and since he's well-spoken, they hire him.  Any University that calls the TLM the 'extraordinary form' and bows to the wishes of the local diocese was never going to hire any Trads anyway.  But still, this university could've done some good, for those young adults who would've learned something orthodox.  Pretty telling that the university failed over a real estate deal; sounds like the professors were duped by some financial "expert" they trusted and he torpedoed the school.  Inside job.
Re: Fisher More College:
TM was upset with Mr King's position repudiating Vll; that along with Mr King having Fr Gruner  say Mass at the college. As TM questioned Fr Gruner's incardination he reported the whole ball of wax to the local Bishop, who then ceased the TLM at the college as a result. I'm not sure about the real estate holdings, but the college could not have possibly gone on without the Mass, as that is the primary reason those students enrolled there.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Stanley N on November 10, 2020, 08:07:12 PM
... but I'm not following him for Trad topics.

He seems to cover fairly routine topics that I expect most well-catechised Catholics would (or should) know. He doesn't seem to cover any complex topics, so I doubt you're missing anything informationally.

What he does have is a little fire in his speech. That sort of passion attracts some people, and they may learn a bit from listening to him.

But like any human source, he makes some mistakes, and you should cross reference what he says with other sources.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 10, 2020, 08:30:37 PM
Catholic Identity Conference 2019
As if that is a quote? 
As if the alleged apology in 2019 covers what he did so far in 2020?
Is he so much of a Judaizer that he prays the Kol Nidre for the lies he is planning to tell? http://judaism.is/kol-nidre.html (http://judaism.is/kol-nidre.html)
I have made accusations against him using VERBATIM QUOTES.
You claim he apologized, but have quoted NOTHING.
I call your bluff.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Croagh Patrick on November 11, 2020, 05:21:04 AM
More evidence, seems to be a plagiariser also taken from Ann Barnhardt's site:

Dear Ann,
Please know that on PAGE 15 of the MCCARRICK REPORT (https://www.barnhardt.biz/2020/11/10/the-what-absolutely-everyone-knew-report/) they are covering up his teenage ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ activities. Since the report starts off at the beginning with cover-ups and lies, why would anyone believe the rest of the report?
The first sentence of the second paragraph on page 15 says that McCarrick graduated from Fordham Prep in 1949. From the first sentence in the first paragraph mentioning that he was born in 1930 to the first sentence in the second paragraph saying that he graduated from Fordham prep in 1949, the report mentions NOTHING about his tumultuous years at XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL in NYC.
Below is the timeline for McCarrick’s teenage years at Xavier, the year and a half between Xavier and Fordham Prep, and his three missing years out of public view by the age of 20 when he was more than likely being groomed for the sodomite priesthood by Cardinal “Nellie” Spellman’s ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ network. Where was “Teddy” and what was he doing those the 16 months between Xavier and Fordham Prep?
https://lesfemmes-thetruth.blogspot.com/2019/01/mccarrick-was-missing-for-3-years.html (https://lesfemmes-thetruth.blogspot.com/2019/01/mccarrick-was-missing-for-3-years.html?m=1)
Also, note the wording in my article of the paragraph for the dates May 1946 – September 1947. “Missing for 16 months with undisclosed whereabouts” were the exact words that a friend who entered Xavier the same year that McCarrick did wrote to me. I accused Taylor Marshall of plagiarism. He wrote his book INFILTRATION by looking everything up on the internet then copying and pasting and on page 122 (I think) of his book he used my timeline and the EXACT SAME words of my friend – “undisclosed whereabouts” – except Marshall said “whereabouts undisclosed.” I didn’t even think of that wording – my friend did – which is why I know that Taylor Marshall was using my timeline.
At any rate, no one paid attention to what seems to be so obvious – which is that, given the academic rigor of both Xavier and Fordham Prep in those days, “Teddy” would never have gotten into Fordham Prep after truancy, poor grades and being expelled from Xavier. But Cardinal Spellman definitely could get him in. After “Teddy” entered Fordham Prep he zoomed to the top of his class and earned 4 superiors his senior year. Some turnaround from 16 months before when he was expelled from Xavier.
(https://www.barnhardt.biz/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/img_3234-1.jpg)
A year ago or so I contacted George Neumayr and he agreed with me. I asked him if he could somehow get Xavier to let him see their archives for the year McCarrick had been expelled – school year of 1945-46 but nothing ever came of it.
I still have the page copied from Fordham Prep’s website before they removed it saying that McCarrick had been Fordham Prep’s “Whiz Kid” of 1949.
Just thought you should know all this …which was figured out by my friends when they read somewhere that McCarrick had graduated from Fordham Prep in 1949. They knew that both they and McCarrick had entered Xavier in the same year (Sept 1944) and that they had graduated from Xavier in May of 1948….while McCarrick graduated from FP in May 1949. McCarrick himself says he was EXPELLED from Xavier.
Please read the comments after the post. I posted three of these articles on McCarrick but got criticized for it being gossip and not factual. Well, it IS factual. Every bit of it.
Susan Matthiesen
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Viva Cristo Rey on November 11, 2020, 06:00:21 AM
Many zoomed to top of their classes after sleeping for grades. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Stanley N on November 11, 2020, 12:55:10 PM
I'm missing how the last two posts relate to Taylor Marshall.

Do those posts belong to a different thread about someone else with the initials TM?
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: dymphnaw on November 12, 2020, 07:53:34 AM
I'm missing how the last two posts relate to Taylor Marshall.

Do those posts belong to a different thread about someone else with the initials TM?
 Mrs. Mattheisen says that Taylor Marshall plagiarized her post on Ted McCarrick for his Infiltration book. That's one reason why he's been nick-named Dr. Cut and Paste. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Minnesota on November 12, 2020, 08:21:57 AM
Odd for someone with a PhD, considering the large (often 100+ page) thesis one writes to earn a PhD. There is probably more he has plagiarized.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Cera on November 15, 2020, 01:59:04 PM
Mrs. Mattheisen says that Taylor Marshall plagiarized her post on Ted McCarrick for his Infiltration book. That's one reason why he's been nick-named Dr. Cut and Paste.
Unable to find any docuмentation for your charge.

The only  Mrs. Mattheisen I can find is dead.

Please provide source.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Incredulous on November 15, 2020, 02:50:06 PM

Rather, if you don’t know what the Opus Dei cult is, do more research.

Many wealthy “Marcos” regime Filipinos who left the country after his demise, were recruited and sucked into the secret society.

Naively thinking they are of the Catholic elite, they will lose their souls.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Yeti on November 15, 2020, 03:54:44 PM
Taylor Marshall pretended not to know who had thrown the pachamama into the Tiber. Then a few months later he came out and admitted he had planned and orchestrated the whole thing.
.
Avoid people who pull stunts like this.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: StLouisIX on November 15, 2020, 04:20:33 PM
Another one of Taylor Marshall's controversies was his and Timothy Gordon's dispute with Dr. E Michael Jones, which ended up with Marshall striking Dr. Jones' YouTube channel when the latter tried to upload a video to defend his position. 

How Marshall handled the situation disgusted me so much that I unsubscribed from his YouTube channel and avoided his material for several months afterward. 

Here is an article which covered that controversy: http://www.theeponymousflower.com/2019/05/taylor-marshall-and-tim-gordon-slander.html
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 15, 2020, 06:01:03 PM


http://www.theeponymousflower.com/2019/05/taylor-marshall-and-tim-gordon-slander.html (http://www.theeponymousflower.com/2019/05/taylor-marshall-and-tim-gordon-slander.html)

Did Marshall offer another one of those s2srea's unfindable "apologies" for all that?

It is important to understand how Opus JuDei promotes the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan: http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html (http://judaism.is/opus-dei.html)

Marshall's long and intimate connection with Opus JuDei (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/search/label/Taylor%20Marshall) reminds me of the Chabad "Messiah's" encouragement of deceit: "Be Chabad on the inside (http://judaism.is/chabad.html)."  Marshall's modus operandi seems like a parallel, "Be Opus JuDei on the inside."  He seems to behave like a treacherous marrano (http://judaism.is/marranos.html).
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Prayerful on November 15, 2020, 06:35:24 PM
He pretty much is. 🤷🏻‍♂️
If someone unfamiliar with things saw his recent broadcasts, they'd think Donald Trump was a Catholic Saint. Francis and Modernism remain the bigger danger than some President Biden cheating his way, or rather others doing the cheating for him, into office.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Nadir on November 16, 2020, 02:06:29 AM
He pretty much is. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Just what does that mean?
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Nadir on November 16, 2020, 04:16:12 AM
Unable to find any docuмentation for your charge.

The only  Mrs. Mattheisen I can find is dead.

Please provide source.

The problem is in Dymphna’s spelling. It’s Susan Matthiesen.
LES FEMMES - THE TRUTH: From Age 15 McCarrick Was Groomed for the Sodomite Priesthood
https://lesfemmes-thetruth.blogspot.com/2018/08/from-age-15-mccarrick-was-groomed-for.html

Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Cera on November 16, 2020, 05:08:13 PM
The problem is in Dymphna’s spelling. It’s Susan Matthiesen.
LES FEMMES - THE TRUTH: From Age 15 McCarrick Was Groomed for the Sodomite Priesthood
https://lesfemmes-thetruth.blogspot.com/2018/08/from-age-15-mccarrick-was-groomed-for.html

So I went to this link and it says NOTHING about Taylor Marshall. I can find no basis whatsoever for the allegation of plagiarism. The one attack on Marshall I was able to find was a joke. He cited a source and provided a  FOOTNOTE. Duh.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: josefamenendez on November 16, 2020, 07:16:58 PM
I think the point Nadir was making was that the  previous poster showed where the author Susan Matthiesen accused Taylor Marshall of plagiarizing her piece about McCarrick; and the reason you couldn't find her (Matthiesen)was that the original spelling of the name was wrong. Also this was the article referred to by the author that Taylor Marshall plagiarized. If you read through the posts and the article you can see it ( "undisclosed whereabouts"). He of course, would not be mentioned in the article. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: andy on November 20, 2020, 04:57:53 PM
Part II is out https://akacatholic.com/who-is-taylor-marshall-part-ii-infiltration/. What are those 3 groups "Certainly, there is evidence that these groups have infiltrated the Church; however, there seem to be at least two (or perhaps three) groups missing from the list."?
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Nadir on November 20, 2020, 09:24:48 PM
So I went to this link and it says NOTHING about Taylor Marshall. I can find no basis whatsoever for the allegation of plagiarism. The one attack on Marshall I was able to find was a joke. He cited a source and provided a  FOOTNOTE. Duh.
What does "duh" mean?
I said nothing about Taylor Marshall. I answered you to show that you were looking for the wrong (misspelled) name.


Quote
The only  Mrs. Mattheisen I can find is dead.
Part imagination and lack of reading comprehension on your part!
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: josefamenendez on November 20, 2020, 09:37:51 PM
Part II is out https://akacatholic.com/who-is-taylor-marshall-part-ii-infiltration/. What are those 3 groups "Certainly, there is evidence that these groups have infiltrated the Church; however, there seem to be at least two (or perhaps three) groups missing from the list."?
Thank you for posting this ( Part ll)
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Nadir on November 21, 2020, 01:29:30 AM
Akacatholic is bein* censored, or at least these articles, so here:

By: Dr. Jesse Russell
In 2015, Indiana attorney David Wemhoff published what is perhaps the most important American Catholic journalistic exposé of the second decade of the twentieth century: John Courtney Murray, Time/Life, and the American Proposition.
In his masterwork, Wemhoff chronicles the alleged colonization and infiltration of the Catholic Church in America by the American intelligence community through figures such as Fr. John Courtney Murray, S.J.
Just as the American intellectual establishment had set about selling American style political and economic liberalism to the world via outlets such as Henry Luce’s Time Magazine, so too did organizations such as the Central Intelligence Agency seek to hijack the Catholic Church for the spread of Americanism, not only among American Catholics, but to Catholics throughout the world.
While Catholics might not agree with everything in his book, Wemhoff’s work provides the missing piece of the puzzle of the likely source of the Catholic neo-conservative movement and grants an explanation for why so many (even non-American) Catholic prelates and laity became so rabidly Americanist throughout the twentieth century, peddling religious liberty, “democratic capitalism,” ecuмenism, and a host of notions that primed Catholics for service to America in the Cold War, and later War on Terror, and now the interior civil strife that is tearing the fabric of the republic to pieces.
One of the most interesting elements of Wemhoff’s analysis is the idea that Catholics were instructed by their CIA and other American establishment influencers to label anyone who disagreed with Americanism (even traditionalists and monarchists) as commies and “reds.” These orders possibly explain why Catholic neo-conservatives have worked to suppress traditionalist critiques of liberalism, free market economics, consumerism, and usury.
As difficult as this may be for some Catholics to admit, this may mean that many of the claims concerning Marxist and KBG influence in the Church could possibly be, if not exaggerated, then at the very least manipulated to serve an Americanist agenda.
Taking into account the groundbreaking work of Hoover Institute scholar, Antony C. Sutton, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, which chronicles the bankrolling of the Soviet Union by American financiers (as the work of other scholars that points to strange American and European connections with the Soviet Union), Wemhoff’s work opens a very curious question.
Is it possible that the same Cold War dialectic allegedly controlled by wealthy globalist interests was at work within the Church itself?
Is it possible that the Catholic neo-conservatives and liberals were both sparring partners moving the Modernist dialectic further to its logical and radical conclusion?
Perhaps.
At the very least, we now have a clearer picture of how the Catholic neo-conservatives got their start and who (at least potentially) was paying their way during the 1980s as well as the Zenith of the “JPII” era during the 1990s and 2000s.
In the current Year of Our Lord 2020, with the resurgence of traditionalism and the rise of Trumpian populism, the Catholic neoconservatives have taken the back seat in Catholic discourse.
It thus appears that their Americanist backers in both the private and public sectors have been forced to switch tactics and recruit and influence a new generation of media figures, theologians, and clerics to promote the Americanist agenda under the new guise of “traditionalism” or “populism.”
Among contemporary Catholic media figures there is no more popular salesman of this rebranded Americanism than Taylor Marshall.
A relatively obscure Catholic blogger until very recently, Marshall not only has become the public face of traditionalist Catholicism, he is increasingly one of the most recognizable promoters of Trumpianism.
The key work that has rocketed Marshall to his success is his 2019 magnum opus: Infiltration: The Plot to Destroy the Church from Within.
As has often been remarked, Marshall’s work offers little that is new to traditionalists.
Indeed, in many ways, Infiltration is a composite of tradlore and conspiriana that had been printed for years in the pages of The Remnant, Catholic Family News, and a host of other websites.
What is curious, as in The Crucified Rabbi, is what Marshall doesn’t say in Infiltration.
According to Taylor Marshall, the Church has been infiltrated by the following organizations:
[color][size][font]
Certainly, there is evidence that these groups have infiltrated the Church; however, there seem to be at least two (or perhaps three) groups missing from the list.
The readers of AKA Catholic will, no doubt, know who these groups are.
Why, one might ask, would Marshall seemingly deliberately omit these groups from Infiltration?
To answer this question, we need look no further than the Catholic and, more importantly, secular media outlets that have catapulted Taylor Marshall into the limelight.
Is there any connection between these media outlets and Western intelligence as well as any other organizations that might benefit from Marshall’s omissions in Infiltration?
We might also wonder if, as with The Crucified Rabbi, Marshall and his backers are trying to head off the work of alternative Catholic researchers like David Wemhoff and E. Michael Jones who have broadened the list of infiltrators into the Catholic Church.
While Wemhoff and Jones are better researchers than Marshall, Taylor Marshall’s presentation is much flashier and far reaching than the latter two researchers, and thus, as Aristotle noted long ago in his Rhetoric, the personality of a speaker will often overshadow the better argument of another in the mind of an audience.
Before proceeding to part three of our series, we are left with a very curious question:
Is there a Catholic organization that has a long history of liaisons with the CIA as well as other Western intelligence groups?
If so, does Taylor Marshall have any connection with this hypothetical Catholic organization?
Stay tuned for Who is Taylor Marshall? Part III: The Sword and the Serpent
(https://akacatholic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/aka-Spin-Job.jpg) (https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=E7C4J9NJGSUUU)

Share this post on:[0]=https%3A%2F%2Fakacatholic.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2020%2F11%2FInfiltration.jpg&p[title]=Who%20is%20Taylor%20Marshall%3F%C2%A0Part%20II%3A%20Infiltration](https://akacatholic.com/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/96x96/facebook.png)]=https%3A%2F%2Fakacatholic.com%2F%3Fp%3D18165&p[images][0]=https%3A%2F%2Fakacatholic.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2020%2F11%2FInfiltration.jpg&p[title]=Who%20is%20Taylor%20Marshall%3F%C2%A0Part%20II%3A%20Infiltration](https://akacatholic.com/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/96x96/facebook.png) (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fakacatholic.com%2F%3Fp%3D18165&t=Who%20is%20Taylor%20Marshall%3F%C2%A0Part%20II%3A%20Infiltration&s=100&p[url=http://=https%3A%2F%2Fakacatholic.com%2F%3Fp%3D18165&p[images)(https://akacatholic.com/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/96x96/twitter.png) (http://twitter.com/share?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakacatholic.com%2F%3Fp%3D18165&text=Hey%20check%20this%20out)(https://akacatholic.com/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/96x96/google_plus.png) (https://plus.google.com/share?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakacatholic.com%2F%3Fp%3D18165)(https://akacatholic.com/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/96x96/reddit.png) (http://www.reddit.com/submit?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakacatholic.com%2F%3Fp%3D18165&title=Who%20is%20Taylor%20Marshall%3F%C2%A0Part%20II%3A%20Infiltration)
Follow us on:(https://akacatholic.com/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/96x96/facebook.png) (https://www.facebook.com/louie.verrecchio)(https://akacatholic.com/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/96x96/twitter.png) (https://twitter.com/LouieVerrecchio)(https://akacatholic.com/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/96x96/google_plus.png) (http://google.com/+LouieVerrecchio)(https://akacatholic.com/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/96x96/vimeo.png) (https://vimeo.com/user12213053)

Related Posts
 (https://akacatholic.com/in-search-of-solutions-to-the-present-crisis/)
(https://akacatholic.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/JPII-lying-in-state-e1486830183676-191x120.jpg)
 (https://akacatholic.com/in-search-of-solutions-to-the-present-crisis/)
In search of solutions to the present crisis
 (https://akacatholic.com/in-search-of-solutions-to-the-present-crisis/) (https://akacatholic.com/urgent-the-most-important-petition-youll-ever-sign/)
(https://akacatholic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Petition-191x120.jpg)
 (https://akacatholic.com/urgent-the-most-important-petition-youll-ever-sign/)
URGENT: The most important petition you’ll ever sign
 (https://akacatholic.com/urgent-the-most-important-petition-youll-ever-sign/) (https://akacatholic.com/jorge-in-morocco-preaching-a-fake-jesus/)
(https://akacatholic.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Jorge-and-the-Imam-191x120.jpg)
 (https://akacatholic.com/jorge-in-morocco-preaching-a-fake-jesus/)
Jorge in Morocco: Preaching a #FAKE “Jesus”
 (https://akacatholic.com/jorge-in-morocco-preaching-a-fake-jesus/)
[/font][/size][/color]

Recent Posts
[color][size][font]
Popular Posts
[/font][/size][/color]


Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Nadir on November 21, 2020, 01:31:07 AM
Sorry for the messy post. It’s the best I could do.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: josefamenendez on November 21, 2020, 07:46:40 AM
In the current Year of Our Lord 2020, with the resurgence of traditionalism and the rise of Trumpian populism, the Catholic neoconservatives have taken the back seat in Catholic discourse.
It thus appears that their Americanist backers in both the private and public sectors have been forced to switch tactics and recruit and influence a new generation of media figures, theologians, and clerics to promote the Americanist agenda under the new guise of “traditionalism” or “populism.”
Among contemporary Catholic media figures there is no more popular salesman of this rebranded Americanism than Taylor Marshall.

Yes, this. Taylor Marshall seems particularly crafted to fit the role of a "Traditionalist Influencer" while not losing the basic philosophy of judaic neoconservatism. Another wellplaced sayanim , Jєω or not.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: 2Vermont on November 21, 2020, 08:36:52 AM
You might find this interesting:

https://novusordowatch.org/2020/08/assessing-taylor-marshalls-infiltration/

Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: MMagdala on November 21, 2020, 12:30:18 PM
No traditionalist Catholics should be fawning over lay so-called "leaders" or self-proclaimed "experts."  You should be led by qualified, ordained men, formed in Tradition.  If you don't believe you have access to any of those, anywhere, then rely on the Fathers and Doctors, as well as long-ago orthodox and sainted Popes.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Mark 79 on November 21, 2020, 12:51:24 PM
You might find this interesting:

https://novusordowatch.org/2020/08/assessing-taylor-marshalls-infiltration/
Excellent. Thank you.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: StLouisIX on November 21, 2020, 12:58:02 PM
During an interview from March of this year, Taylor Marshall openly states that he is considering an interview with Bishop Williamson. Although nothing has come of this, it is still interesting that he even floated the idea in the first place.

Link to the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAmhoqjyiEA&feature=emb_title



Skip to 22:10 for Marshall talking about interviewing +Williamson

It would seem that +Williamson would not be opposed to such an interview, considering the fact that he was interviewed by another YouTube channel back in May. Here is that interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7o90Iu-bUsg&t=4663s


My original thread on this subject: https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/dr-taylor-marshall-considering-an-interview-with-bishop-williamson/msg690583/#msg690583


Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Bonaventure on November 30, 2020, 08:44:49 AM
If true, this is interesting.

(https://i.ibb.co/Mk8zMcD/TM.jpg)

https://twitter.com/BackwardsFeet/status/1333131056149565441
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Matto on November 30, 2020, 11:23:36 AM
It amazes me how much money some of the trad talking heads make. He is not the only one. I used to think that the trad market was so niche that to become one of the trad talking heads was to relegate oneself to poverty. But clearly I was wrong.

That priest also claimed that TM has a big Bennyvacantist market as there was a poll where 50 percent of those who responded in his audience believe that Benedict is still the Pope. I guess that is bigger than normal sedevacantism now.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: andy on November 30, 2020, 11:42:20 AM
That priest also claimed that TM has a big Bennyvacantist market as there was a poll where 50 percent of those who responded in his audience believe that Benedict is still the Pope. I guess that is bigger than normal sedevacantism now.
Does abp. Vigano add to the drama (by being Bennyvacantist) vide https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/ewtn's-raymond-arroyo-interviews-archbishop-vigano-mccarrick-report?
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Cera on November 30, 2020, 12:32:34 PM
No traditionalist Catholics should be fawning over lay so-called "leaders" or self-proclaimed "experts."  You should be led by qualified, ordained men, formed in Tradition.  If you don't believe you have access to any of those, anywhere, then rely on the Fathers and Doctors, as well as long-ago orthodox and sainted Popes.
This is especially true of Tradition in Action, an anti-Catholic, anti-clerical heretical cult (according to Bishop Meyer.) Their leader Atila laid face down on the floor in front of Plinio, the founded of their original group, Tradition, Family and Property, and said confession to this layman and "consecrated" his life to him.
Some traditional Catholics have been duped by both of these groups, which make Taylor Marshall look like an ancient sainted Pope in comparison.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Cera on November 30, 2020, 12:34:06 PM
If true, this is interesting.



Who is Fr. Hedman? A new N. O. priest? Please give the link for your screen save.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: StLouisIX on November 30, 2020, 01:00:53 PM
Nick Fuentes and Dr. Taylor Marshall had a dispute a few months ago, here is Nick's side of the story:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZOcyusbX00




Whatever you think of Nick (I don't have a particularly high opinion of him anymore), it is still interesting to note that these two had interacted positively in the past, and that Marshall allegedly backstabbed him.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Matto on November 30, 2020, 01:11:16 PM
Wow. Nick Fuentes calls himself a traditional Catholic? Does he go to the Latin Mass? I don't watch his show so I don't know.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: StLouisIX on November 30, 2020, 01:51:25 PM
Wow. Nick Fuentes calls himself a traditional Catholic? Does he go to the Latin Mass? I don't watch his show so I don't know.
When I used to follow him, I remember that he stated once that the Douay Rheims Bible is the best version of the Holy Bible, although (I think?) he said that he owns another, more modern(ist) version such as the RSV. 

Not too sure if he goes to the Latin Mass, I don't think he has publicly made a statement on this. 
Here's his take on the "civil unions" comment from Pope Francis: 



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmr4cxuD0lI




He seems to hold the R&R position, albeit too trusting of the Conciliar Church establishment. Not too sure if he's said anything about SSPX or the Resistance. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: claudel on November 30, 2020, 03:26:56 PM

… I remember that he stated once that the Douay Rheims Bible is the best version of the Holy Bible, although (I think?) he said that he owns another, more modern(ist) version such as the RSV.

There is nothing modernist about the RSV-CE. It is a slander to describe it thus. The RSV-CE should be at or near the top of any English-speaking Catholic's preferred translations. I certainly place it several rungs higher than the original DR and even the Challoner-Rheims, which is largely superseded by the long-out-of-print Confraternity revision of the forties and fifties.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Prayerful on November 30, 2020, 03:43:37 PM
Wow. Nick Fuentes calls himself a traditional Catholic? Does he go to the Latin Mass? I don't watch his show so I don't know.
Nick Fuentes is friendly with some extraordinarily immoral, often sɛҳuąƖly confused people, including an Australian I don't want to name. He seems to be nearly the biggest streamer on Dlive, a Turkish run, Chicom owned, streaming website. Honestly I think he's a Fed asset. Half of a recent rally in Phoenix were these stony faced older men, plus a bunch of drug users who travel around in an RV.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: StLouisIX on November 30, 2020, 03:52:53 PM
There is nothing modernist about the RSV-CE. It is a slander to describe it thus. The RSV-CE should be at or near the top of any English-speaking Catholic's preferred translations. I certainly place it several rungs higher than the original DR and even the Challoner-Rheims, which is largely superseded by the long-out-of-print Confraternity revision of the forties and fifties.
You may be right. Perhaps it was irresponsible of me to say that, and if I am wrong, I take back what I have said. I was thinking more so of an edition such as the infamous New American Bible, but he did not mention that one, to my knowledge. I am, however, suspicious of any new Bible version post-Vatican II. One issue with the RSV-CE seems to be that it was a product of ecuмenism.

From the Introduction to 1965 RSV-CE New Testament:

"At the present time, however, the sciences of textual criticism and philology, not to mention others, have made such great advances that the bible text used by translators is substantially the same for all — Protestants and Catholics alike. Thus, for example, Catholics no longer make their translations from the Latin Vulgate; though it is arguable that before the development of textual criticism it was in certain respects a better way of making a translation than to make it from late and in some places corrupt Greek manuscripts as was done by some of the Reformers. Today, and indeed since the appearance in 1943 of the Encyclical Letter "Divino Afflante Spiritu" encouraging Biblical studies, Catholics like everyone else go back to the original languages and base their translations on the same critical principles.

Although twenty years have passed since the Encyclical Letter first appeared, there is still no Catholic translation of the whole Bible from the original languages available to English-speaking readers, though at least two are well on the way to completion. It was in fact with a view to filling this rather obvious gap in the shortest possible time that some Catholic scholars considered the possibility of so editing the Revised Standard Version, on its appearance in 1952, as to make it acceptable to Catholic readers.

Following up these advances in Biblical knowledge comes the great improvement in relations between the Christian Churches of which we are witnesses at the present time and which is not without its influence in still further narrowing the margin of difference between Bible translations. This is not to say that all differences have disappeared. There is frequently more than one way of translating a word or phrase with the critical evidence for each interpretation fairly evenly balanced. In such cases each man will translate according to his background and training. Thus a Roman Catholic might and indeed usually would give more weight to a reading or an interpretation which was traditional in his Church.

......

A small committee of members of the Catholic Biblical Association was formed and permission obtained to examine this translation and suggest any changes that might be required to make it acceptable to Catholics. The Standard Bible Committee of the U.S.A. was then approached and they gave a warm welcome to the proposal. Here was a wonderful opportunity to make a real step forward in the field of ecuмenical relations.

......

In the present edition the aim has been to make the minimum number of alterations and to change only what seemed absolutely necessary in the light of Catholic tradition." (Emphasis mine)

http://www.bible-researcher.com/rsv-ce.html
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: StLouisIX on November 30, 2020, 04:03:13 PM
Nick Fuentes is friendly with some extraordinarily immoral, often sɛҳuąƖly confused people, including an Australian I don't want to name. He seems to be nearly the biggest streamer on Dlive, a Turkish run, Chicom owned, streaming website. Honestly I think he's a Fed asset. Half of a recent rally in Phoenix were these stony faced older men, plus a bunch of drug users who travel around in an RV.
He WAS friendly with that particular man, until that individual went to a Trump rally and repeated a Hitler speech (in English) which denounced the Jєωs. Then, Fuentes disavowed him for "bad optics". It says a lot that THIS would cause him to cut ties with such an individual, not the degenerate activities that he partook in. 

Fuentes claimed that he tried to convert that man to Christianity when he met with him, take his word for what you will.

He could be an asset...but I personally think that he's just in it for himself. He seems to care more about influence and power than the Faith, which is why he allies himself to Zionist assets like Alex Jones and is on friendly terms with sɛҳuąƖ degenerates who have enough of a following. I do not want to make unfounded assumptions, but that is how it appears to me. 


Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: claudel on November 30, 2020, 05:02:06 PM

… I was thinking more so of an edition such as the infamous New American Bible, but he did not mention that one, to my knowledge.

Happily, there is no connection between the NAB, in any of its four or five different rewrites, and the RSV, with or without the "CE" tagged on.

As for the material you emphasize with underscoring, I hope you don't think it contains any gotchas. Indeed, the highlighted sentences offer no more than an admirably honest statement of the facts, not least with regard to the arguably superior reliability of the Vulgate in much of the past. As Holy Mother Church considers only the urtext versions of the Testaments divinely inspired, however, there was nothing "modernist" in her embrace, starting in the forties, of the developments in biblical scholarship and archaeology that facilitated far wider use of the Hebrew and Greek sources in the making of new vernacular translations. It hardly needs explaining that genuine scholarship has nothing in common with the textually unwarranted use of "gender neutrality" nor with the desire to make Sacred Scripture more "gαy friendly."
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: dymphnaw on November 30, 2020, 05:20:16 PM
So I went to this link and it says NOTHING about Taylor Marshall. I can find no basis whatsoever for the allegation of plagiarism. The one attack on Marshall I was able to find was a joke. He cited a source and provided a  FOOTNOTE. Duh.
Oh for pity's sake. 
https://www.barnhardt.biz/2020/11/10/mccarrick-report-covers-up-teddys-expulsion-from-xavier-high-school-and-sodomitical-activity/
Susan Matthiesen wrote an email to Ann Barnhardt. See the link above. She says it plainly. 
"Also, note the wording in my article of the paragraph for the dates May 1946 – September 1947. “Missing for 16 months with undisclosed whereabouts” were the exact words that a friend who entered Xavier the same year that McCarrick did wrote to me. I accused Taylor Marshall of plagiarism. He wrote his book INFILTRATION by looking everything up on the internet then copying and pasting and on page 122 (I think) of his book he used my timeline and the EXACT SAME words of my friend – “undisclosed whereabouts” – except Marshall said “whereabouts undisclosed.” I didn’t even think of that wording – my friend did – which is why I know that Taylor Marshall was using my timeline."
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: StLouisIX on November 30, 2020, 06:01:11 PM
Happily, there is no connection between the NAB, in any of its four or five different rewrites, and the RSV, with or without the "CE" tagged on.

As for the material you emphasize with underscoring, I hope you don't think it contains any gotchas. Indeed, the highlighted sentences offer no more than an admirably honest statement of the facts, not least with regard to the arguably superior reliability of the Vulgate in much of the past. As Holy Mother Church considers only the urtext versions of the Testaments divinely inspired, however, there was nothing "modernist" in her embrace, starting in the forties, of the developments in biblical scholarship and archaeology that facilitated far wider use of the Hebrew and Greek sources in the making of new vernacular translations. It hardly needs explaining that genuine scholarship has nothing in common with the textually unwarranted use of "gender neutrality" nor with the desire to make Sacred Scripture more "gαy friendly."
My bad then. I assumed that there was a connection between the two. 

I underlined those portions because I found them somewhat ambiguous, as on one hand the docuмent praises the “ecuмenical” aspect of this work, but at the same time wants this translation to be faithful to Catholic Tradition. 

However, do you know if the footnotes of this translation contain any modernist tendencies? Just curious at this point. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: claudel on November 30, 2020, 07:31:15 PM

My bad then. I assumed that there was a connection between the two.

I underlined those portions because I found them somewhat ambiguous, as on one hand the docuмent praises the “ecuмenical” aspect of this work, but at the same time wants this translation to be faithful to Catholic Tradition.

However, do you know if the footnotes of this translation contain any modernist tendencies? Just curious at this point.

You're not bad, just a bit misinformed. Don't beat yourself up.

Apropos the footnotes, everybody involved with preparing the RSV-CE was absolutely scrupulous. That includes the staff of Oxford University Press, which was making a big investment that could have cost them a fortune in lost sales if Catholic scholars, hierarchy, and reviewers smelled a rat. Remember, these were the fifties.

The true meaning of "ecuмenical" in the context of biblical research was nothing more than a public acknowledgment of the fact that Christians (and even many Jєωs) who worked in the related fields of ancient manuscripts and biblical archaeology tended to know and like one another and to share a devotion both to their work and to the truth—that is, truth as it related to the integrity of biblical source materials. (Things have changed for the worse in this century, however.) For example, most people outside the field are unaware that during the past fifty or sixty years, some of the most important work in finding and reconstructing biblical MSS has been done by scholars who are fundies and Evangelicals. When, long ago, I expressed surprise about this, the expert (a Catholic) who told me said, "Well, when you think about it, it's less surprising that it initially seems. For them, the literal text of the Bible is the crux of their entire belief system. They have no Tradition as we do, no institutional structure extending back nineteen hundred years. When all you have is the Word of God, literally nothing is more important than getting the individual words right."
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: claudel on November 30, 2020, 07:49:20 PM

There is nothing modernist about the RSV-CE. It is a slander to describe it thus. The RSV-CE should be at or near the top of any English-speaking Catholic's preferred translations.

Apropos trustworthy and untrustworthy translations of the Bible, especially with regard to absence of gender-neutrality distortions, has anyone ever taught you the Psalm 1 rule of thumb? If not, let me.

All else being equal and other questions of accuracy being put to one side for the nonce, the opening words of Psalm 1 will tell you whether you have an honestly translated Bible in front of you. If those opening words are "Blessed is the man" or "Fortunate is the man" or "Happy is the man," you can lower your guard. If, however, the words are "Blessed are those" or a similar variant of one of the other two forms above, you know that gender neutrality infects the sacred books.

One of the very finest English translations is to be found in the New Jerusalem Bible—or at least it would be if all the phony plurals were expunged and replaced with the authentic forms: "he," "him," and "man."
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Cera on December 01, 2020, 12:14:19 PM
Oh for pity's sake.
https://www.barnhardt.biz/2020/11/10/mccarrick-report-covers-up-teddys-expulsion-from-xavier-high-school-and-sodomitical-activity/
Susan Matthiesen wrote an email to Ann Barnhardt. See the link above. She says it plainly.
"Also, note the wording in my article of the paragraph for the dates May 1946 – September 1947. “Missing for 16 months with undisclosed whereabouts” were the exact words that a friend who entered Xavier the same year that McCarrick did wrote to me. I accused Taylor Marshall of plagiarism. He wrote his book INFILTRATION by looking everything up on the internet then copying and pasting and on page 122 (I think) of his book he used my timeline and the EXACT SAME words of my friend – “undisclosed whereabouts” – except Marshall said “whereabouts undisclosed.” I didn’t even think of that wording – my friend did – which is why I know that Taylor Marshall was using my timeline."
This has already been addressed. What she called "plagiarism" is not -- it's perfectly legitimate to cite a source and footnote it giving credit to that source. Go to the original docuмent and you will see.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: magdalena59 on December 25, 2020, 03:45:25 PM
Well, I just read through this whole thread on Taylor Marshall and I don't usually post comments but with all charity, ...

When the young Alexander threw the pachamama in the river, he took a lot of insults and attacks from the internet world and when he was interviewed he talked about the possibility of being charged with a crime and people were asking him if he had a lawyer. 

I found it very upsetting when later Marshall admits to his involvement after allowing that young man to be insulted, attacked and possibly face criminal charges all alone while Marshall sat in his youtube chair. It is apparent in the video that Alexander asks Marshall if it was now the time to tell the people about Marshall's involvement, so guess who is saying, don't tell anybody I had anything to do with it. Marshall also says in the video he wasn't prepared but go ahead, so it is apparent that it wasn't his idea even to come clean at that moment.  I don't know, I find that pretty horrible. 

Also, I hope with all that money Marshall is receiving on patreon, (according to Fr. Paul Hedman's tweet), his books, and his institute that Marshall would have been willing to help that young man pay for his lawyer fees if needed, but I doubt it because IMHO Alexander was being used.


With all charity, IMHO Marshall seems to be someone on a spiritual journey without a map, rather than any type of traditional Catholic.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Incredulous on December 25, 2020, 05:19:06 PM

No doubt,  Marshall has an unlimited line of credit with Bank Opus judei.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Prayerful on December 25, 2020, 08:34:30 PM
He WAS friendly with that particular man, until that individual went to a Trump rally and repeated a Hitler speech (in English) which denounced the Jєωs. Then, Fuentes disavowed him for "bad optics". It says a lot that THIS would cause him to cut ties with such an individual, not the degenerate activities that he partook in.

Fuentes claimed that he tried to convert that man to Christianity when he met with him, take his word for what you will.

He could be an asset...but I personally think that he's just in it for himself. He seems to care more about influence and power than the Faith, which is why he allies himself to Zionist assets like Alex Jones and is on friendly terms with sɛҳuąƖ degenerates who have enough of a following. I do not want to make unfounded assumptions, but that is how it appears to me.
So he disavowed the Antipodean for attacking the Jєωs? This just is funny. Perhaps it is a long after the fact effort to enter the GOP mainstream. He is undoubtedly a grifter, but probably an asset in the sense that he lets himself be an approved dead end for those who seek to oppose the Powers That Be, a bit like Biden voter Richard Spencer, a grown man whose parents provide him with the sort of locked down trust ($90,000 per year but no say over the source of the funds, the family agri-business and investments) meant for children or idiots. I doubt Nick Fuentes has some sort of de-briefing as a formal, but following him seems like a useless diversion. The same could be said of many other alt-right streamers who seem rhetorically sound, but are utterly degenerate, worse than the Australian pervert. Nick Fuentes allying with them suggests a clout chaser. Yes, it'd be wrong to make unfounded, uncharitable assumptions, but the evidence suggests Nick Fuentes is dubious. 
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: Matthew on December 26, 2020, 12:30:44 AM
With all charity, IMHO Marshall seems to be someone on a spiritual journey without a map, rather than any type of traditional Catholic.

A complete newbie to Tradition might be sucked in to Taylor Marshall fandom. But not me. NOT A FAN.

If he were defending Archbishop Lefebvre, and his successors including Bp. Williamson -- now we'd be talking.

He's 100% definitely controlled opposition, a classic case of it.

But instead, Taylor gives no credit where credit is due. He ignores the pioneering work of the Trads who went before him. It's all about him, his personality, his popularity, and his channel.
Title: Re: Who is Taylor Marshall?
Post by: StLouisIX on December 26, 2020, 12:50:08 PM
So he disavowed the Antipodean for attacking the Jєωs? This just is funny. Perhaps it is a long after the fact effort to enter the GOP mainstream. He is undoubtedly a grifter, but probably an asset in the sense that he lets himself be an approved dead end for those who seek to oppose the Powers That Be, a bit like Biden voter Richard Spencer, a grown man whose parents provide him with the sort of locked down trust ($90,000 per year but no say over the source of the funds, the family agri-business and investments) meant for children or idiots. I doubt Nick Fuentes has some sort of de-briefing as a formal, but following him seems like a useless diversion. The same could be said of many other alt-right streamers who seem rhetorically sound, but are utterly degenerate, worse than the Australian pervert. Nick Fuentes allying with them suggests a clout chaser. Yes, it'd be wrong to make unfounded, uncharitable assumptions, but the evidence suggests Nick Fuentes is dubious.
I'll post that video and some other relevant information in the Nick Fuentes thread so as not to derail this one: 

https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/nick-fuentes/msg680853/#msg680853