I think this post is a little unfair. The book in question is over a decade old.
The man seems to have mad a hard shift towards tradition in the past couple of years. Marshall used to be anti-sspx. He now attends an sspx chapel in texas semi-regularly. He used to be anti-Lefebvre. Now he constantly praises him and Michael Davies, and others.
But people here read a post on a book that's 12 years old and hold him to it. Y'all are acting like a bunch of women. To the women in the group, you might be excused. To the men. Shameful. Clucking about everyone whom you think lesser than yourselves. I admonish you as your brother in Christ. I am not perfect either.
Ya know. We've dreamt of a time when the masses would turn towards tradition. When people would support the Old Mass and old teachings of Holy Mother Church. Yet it's happening in our lifetime. And people on this forum are finally proving all those people true who for years have called us traditionalist pharisees. Do not be left behind.
"What good does it do to speak learnedly about the Trinity if, lacking humility, you displease the Trinity? Indeed it is not learning that makes a man holy and just, but a virtuous life makes him pleasing to God. I would rather feel contrition than know how to define it. For what would it profit us to know the whole Bible by heart and the principles of all the philosophers if we live without grace and the love of God? Vanity of vanities and all is vanity, except to love God and serve Him alone."