Author Topic: Visiting other planets is routine - Satanic? (Read 10476 times)

Croix de Fer · « **Reply #75 on:** February 13, 2014, 12:59:39 AM »

Quote

There is no such occult power that can exist and be stronger then the legitimate power. It's impossible by the nature of power itself.

Not when this occult force is guided by legions of demons, and perhaps, Satan himself; and when they print and control most of the world's money supply. How else could these same Bankersteins effect themselves into so many strategic positions of influence and importance, in both the public and private sectors to include government; geopolitics; domestic & global economy; mass media & Hollywood; cultural hubs & "education"; religion; etc., when they only comprise 2 % of the U.S. population, and 1/4 of one percent of the global population?

Does not Matthew 27:25 tell us of the ongoing disposition, or curse, of these people?

icterus · « **Reply #76 on:** February 13, 2014, 12:45:41 PM »

Quote

Why no return to the moon? Is it because the moon is just a dead dusty rock with no real intrinsic value? Kind of like one super expensive road trip?

I'll add to Claudel's answer:

The space program was not entirely popular with all Americans. There was a backlash during the Apollo missions about the cost vs. social programs. After several missions, the public grew bored and accustomed to it, the propaganda value decreased, and NASA had to switch its priorities to seem responsible...hence the 're-usable' spacecraft.

The re-usable spacecraft was only partially re-usable and I suppose could be honestly called a boondoggle. It sucked up a tremendous amount of money and didn't ever achieve its goals of cost or convenience.

Now that we've come to the end of that regrettable era, people are talking about big missions again.

Personally, I'm not in favor of spending money on NASA. As much as I enjoy technology, I'm not in favor of the USA spending public money on space missions.

icterus · « **Reply #77 on:** February 13, 2014, 12:47:19 PM »

Ascent wrote:

Quote

when they print and control most of the world's money supply. How else could these same Bankersteins effect themselves into so many strategic positions of influence and importance, in both the public and private sectors

Um...by printing and controlling money?

There's no need to multiply causes. Bankers are, by definition, in control of a lot of money. Money implies power. Ergo, bankers are apt to be powerful.

See, I had no need to mention Satan in there at all.

Cuthbert · « **Reply #78 on:** February 13, 2014, 03:19:56 PM »

Well I guess according to icky those ceremonies of devil-worship which are conducted regularly in the Masonic lodges which these banker pieces of filth attend are just to pass the time of day & don't really mean anything or reflect their beliefs & spiritual allegiance in any way. I guess icky's more learned than Gougenot des Mousseaux, Msgr. Jouin, Cardinal Caro y Rodriguez & Fr. Fahey. Time to stop crowing icky, lest a hawk come down & carry you off. You had best go back to picking dung with the chickens.

Croix de Fer · « **Reply #79 on:** February 13, 2014, 07:51:53 PM »

Quote from: icterus

Ascent wrote:

Quote
when they print and control most of the world's money supply. How else could these same Bankersteins effect themselves into so many strategic positions of influence and importance, in both the public and private sectors

Um...by printing and controlling money?

There's no need to multiply causes. Bankers are, by definition, in control of a lot of money. Money implies power. Ergo, bankers are apt to be powerful.

See, I had no need to mention Satan in there at all.

They acquired banking positions through the assistance of Satan. Deduction is not really needed to see this point when reading the whole comment, which basically states their rise to various positions of power is due to Satan helping them. Your attempt to dissect a comment and isolate a certain point, then try to ridicule it under a false premise (wrongfully saying I'm "multiplying causes"), completely fails. That's as bad as strawman argumentation. What's the matter, are you still upset that many people handed you your gluteus maximus regarding NASA and their fake moon landings, therefore, you try to compensate and elevate yourself by fallaciously pointing out "error" in other comments? Are you really that jaded in life and unhappy with yourself?(rhetorical question)

icterus · « **Reply #80 on:** February 14, 2014, 01:12:31 PM »

Quote

many people handed you your gluteus maximus regarding NASA and their fake moon landings

No, no one handed me anything. I dealt with Andy's nutjobbery, and I'll deal with any other that pops up, provided I'm interested and have time.