How dare you accuse me of trying to corrupt the meaning of scripture?
I'll go further than that. You're lying.
The translation often given is "beat" in that verse of Ecclesiasticus. Did you acknowledge that that's what chastise means in context? Of course not. You are dishonest.
By trying to figure out how you were defining a word?
No, by denying that the word means what it means.
We are coming up with different definitions for the same words.
The word only has one meaning in context. You aren't admitting the meaning, because you're not interested in honest discussion.
I spread decption? By saying I read a priest's perspective on how that phrase is used now, and how it doesn't have to mean "to hit"?
Yes, a modernist deception. The Church has always accepted the plain meaning of those passages. Then some liberal priest decides to redefine it, and you go along with it because you don't like corporal punishment.
I have tried to subvert Catholic teaching? I have all kinds of literature, taught by a traditional parish, and none of it speaks of the absolute NECESSITY of beating one's children. I have listened to traditional priests give lectures on this issue. You have twisted my words from my original post to accuse me of some vile stuff, and I am not falling for it.
Now you move the goal-posts and suggest that you were claiming it was about "absolute necessity"
You need to admit that the Bible counsels corporal punishment, and that the Church has always understood that the Bible authorizes it.
Again, your anger-demon is not going to get me. You have done an awful thing by making the accusations you have just made. Still not mad over here, just disgusted and a little sad. You know nothing about me, and I cannot believe someone would say those things to me in real life. How the computer acts as a shield!
You act like a typical malicious liberal, smearing my justified indignation at your disgusting falsification of scripture as some sort of personal problem.
We cannot permit vicious people such as yourself to participate in the smearing of trad parents by cultural marxists, liberal "Catholics", and their "trad" collaborators.
I will happily clarify my position with a traditional priest the next time I get to sit-down with one. I did not do what you are accusing me of, and you need to stop, for your own sake.
Those who know me and read my actual words in the OP would all off their chairs in shock and laughter to read your last response. Cultural marxist I am not, liberal "Catholic" I am not either. Truly crazy, your responses have become.Oh, if you only knew.
If anyone who matters to this site is reading, Tele has suggested a ban for me. If he is the rule of this forum, please ban me.