You just described your own maneuvering the whole time and projected onto me. I've given plenty of facts (basis) for my claims.
The motives you attribute to people who are opposed to prenups are not facts. They are something that you have fabricated from your imagination.
Facts:
1) Courts exponentially favor women over men; and courts are subversive & legislate from the bench
2) There is a much higher probability of "divorce" than a marriage lasting "until death do us part"
3) When these "divorces" occur, the courts give the equity & houses to women, and women are given at least half of all other assets, wealth and savings, despite the man acquiring & building all of it or having owned it before they even got married.
4) "Trad Catholics" are not immune to the epidemic of "divorces". Plenty of "divorces" among trads.
I agree with these and accept them as facts.
Nothing you proposed about what Catholics should do is a true aegis (insurance plan or defense) for men to protect themselves from women preying on everything men built and acquired on their own. One of human conditions the Catholic Church warns us about is people failing what they should do, and teaching us to take measures to protect ourselves from the enemy - spiritual or temporal - who do the opposite of what they should do
Thus, the only viable option to protect men, who are considering marriage, is to get a prenup (and, even better, to reject getting a State marriage license).
Nothing you have proposed is a solution to protect men. Everything you have stated is based off of a Catholic utopia that doesn't exist, nor will it ever exist, before Christ returns and establishes His Heavenly kingdom on earth. But that's what (you) Jews are good at, right? They draft up those utopias and sell them to gullible people. Look at communism, socialism, "social justice", "equality", etc. They offer no real solutions to help or protect people, rather they subject them to more deceit & ills.
Ain't no stopping the truth.
Another subjective opinion with no substance justifying the rejection of prenups. You haven't posted one Catholic citation to support your argument.
I know that marriage without divorce is possible, not because of utopian beliefs, but because I have been married for 38 years. I know, from personal experience, that the main thing that prevents divorce is the determination never to resort to divorce. If a person as sinful and flawed as I am can manage to remain married, then it is possible for just about anybody.
I have a lot of sympathy for men as they face so much injustice around marriage, but I don't see going into marriage expecting to get divorced as a good solution. I also see your emphasis on protecting men as problematic since it is difficult to reconcile with the Catholic understanding of marriage, shown in a passage in Ephesians 5.
Right after a verse that says a wife must obey her husband, we see:
Husbands, love your wives, as Christ also loved the church, and delivered himself up for it.Our Lord did not protect himself. He gave His life for the Church. And that is the model for the husband's relationship the wife.