Your disagreement means that your soul is at grave risk. One cannot call oneself Catholic and not (at least desire to) accept and abide by Catholic teaching. It will not go well for you when you come before the Judge of your soul.
Actions speak louder than words though, and I don't usually ask for proof to back up a claim, but I will on this one, where does the Church site that one who disagrees yet abides by Catholic Teaching is at risk of anything.
It is nothing more than a disagreement I can accept to abide by what the Church teaches but there is nothing that says I have to actually like what the church teaches. By that logic that you gave it would be like saying I disagree with the laws of this country and thusly I am risk of penalty under law to be arrested and interrogated to find out exactly what i disagree with and then probably punished to some degree for that disagreement with the government, even though i have abided by the law and never broke a law.
You are basically saying that as a Catholic one has to be happy with all the Teachings of the Church, and Agree with all the teachings of the Church or else. Obedience to the law and being happy with laws are two different things that do not have to go hand in hand.
Now maybe God chooses to reward those more who agree with and are happy with everything that the Church does and teaches, who knows, that is something completely different.
it is very easy to not agree and to abide by a law at the same time, it is not an impossiblity or a contradiction. I can disagree and even hate that I have to legally stop at a stop sign out in the middle of no where , with no chance of ever seeing a vehicle pass by for hours or days on end, but I stop my vehicle at the stop sign, call BS on having to stop even though no one is around, and then continue on with my life. and then find a forum about driving laws and then complain about the absurdity of having to stop at a stop sign in the middle of no where , with no possible chance of a vehicle showing up.
What is a real contradiction and an impossibilty and hypocritical is to say Hi I am Catholic, I agree and like everything the Church teaches and does, but when no one is watching , i have sex with whom ever i choose when ever i want, I don't attend mass regularly , and I am a democrat who supports the politicals party view on abortion.
An the idea that death and disease is running rampant due to practicing safe sex, there is zero proof on that statement, just as there is zero proof on the psychological damage from someone restraining from engaging sɛҳuąƖ activity at a normal age for human development.
An as to how Jesus said about Marriage, that statement doesn't hold anything any more with how the Church turns around and allows for an annulment and divorce. An then Jesus even mentions divorce or the ability to write a bill of divorce..
An yes I am saying that Catholic Married couples are unable to enjoy marital relations while both people are fertile, because the purpose of intercourse is to pro create, an if the married couple wants to enjoy marital relations how are they supposed to do so if they do not want to or are not ready to have a child. An I am not for abortion either , I am just saying why have free will and then be told we are only to procreate and you cant use a condom or birth control if you are not ready to have a child. The church takes the decision out of the couples hands and removes that option from them out of their own debating.