Regarding the chest and limbs, women's dress was considered to fall within "Marylike modesty" as long as the top did not fall under two finger widths below the base of the neck, the sleeves reached the elbows, and the skirt covered the knees entirely when sitting. This was in the mid 20th century when liberalism and feminism were already widespread, so I would assume St. Alphonsus' standards would be higher (e.g., skirt covering ankles, sleeves to the wrists, nothing at all beneath the throat exposed).
Now, St. Alphonsus speaks of the "bosom" being exposed, so I don't think two, three, or even four inches below the neck being bare would be be considered a mortal sin of scandal..as that's not really the "bosom". Probably just a lesser sin of immodesty.
With the legs, I could see him meaning as a mortal sin of scandal the calves being entirely exposed. That would seem somewhat excessive to me, but that could also be my liberalism talking