I find it interesting how the Priest makes him renounce that the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Son. It is my understanding that within the EO they dispute amongst themselves whether or not He actually does proceed from the Son. My understanding is that the problem they actually have with Catholics is the Pope's authority to modify the creed of an Ecuмenical Council. But this is the greater problem of EO: inconsistency of doctrine - but that's what you get when nobody's "in charge".
This demonstrates quite clearly that the Orthodox aren't just some nice people who are confused, as the Conciliar ecuмenists make them out to be. They're quite pertinacious.
What's a tragic shame is that they reject intercommunion with Catholics (refuse the Last Sacraments, refuse them Communion, etc.) while the NO is perfectly fine with the Orthodox receiving the Sacraments. I recall some talking head on EWTN radio talking about how Orthodox are welcome to receive Catholic sacraments, but that the Orthodox will not allow Catholics to receive Sacraments from them. So in a sense the Orthodox have much more conviction regarding the necessity of correct faith to belong to the Church and be saved than these NO pseudo-Catholics.
We have the V2 papal claimants asserting that the Procession of the Holy Ghost problem is just a simple misunderstanding and we really believe the same thing about it, and the differences are highly nuanced, to the point that the NO have been removing "and the Son" from the creeds, essentially caving to the Orthodox heresy.