Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: What's your "least trad" opinion?  (Read 110 times)

3 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: What's your "least trad" opinion?
« Reply #5 on: Today at 06:48:28 AM »
Yeah, I once saw a video of a large group of black high school girls taking over an intersection in Chicago twerking on top of cars. 
I can't see by what means the grace of faith would reach such a person. 

Re: What's your "least trad" opinion?
« Reply #6 on: Today at 07:05:36 AM »
Yeah, I once saw a video of a large group of black high school girls taking over an intersection in Chicago twerking on top of cars.
I can't see by what means the grace of faith would reach such a person.
I posted this a while ago
https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/louis-billot's-theory-on-'adults-in-age-not-in-reason'-'npcs'/

To me a lot of posting is just thinking out loud and sharing interesting stuff, so I wouldn't say I subscribe entirely to Billot's theory, and it seems it wasn't well received in his day due to its complete novelty. But I can't help but find it kind of compelling: these people you see like that are the embodiment of the popular idea of limbo, they're like in the limbo between an ape and a human.


Re: What's your "least trad" opinion?
« Reply #7 on: Today at 07:30:23 AM »
I actually quite like the city. In a lot of trad circles, and indeed in many sede churches, there's this cowboy/country larp. Actual farmers excepted, naturally. But why are you strolling into church on a Sunday in a cowboy hat and cowboy boots when we know well you're not a farmer? Even beyond this, there's the endless litany of "off the grid" and "return to the land" types who somehow manage to spend hours on Twitter daily. But my grievances with larpers aside, the city really gets overhated; in particular my own city of St. Louis.

Re: What's your "least trad" opinion?
« Reply #8 on: Today at 07:50:09 AM »
I think guns are overrated.

For context:
- I think men who aren't violent criminals should own at least one firearm and be able to use it safely and proficiently.
- I am NOT in favor of gun control.
- Boys should be introduced to them at a young age. Situations could vary.
- I own three guns. Two are them are expensive 50 caliber handcannons.

That being said, I wanted to be a knight on horseback growing up. I own 6 swords and a dagger. I fenced for four years in high school and I greatly enjoyed it. I have always been fascinated by swords and pre-firearm warfare. I don't care at all about modern warfare with guns, drones, missiles, etc. Pretty much all of it seems like it is long range and I find that impersonal, unnatural, and uninteresting.

One of my favorite movies is "The Last Samurai" with Tom Cruise. It's not a Catholic movie but it is basically a critique of modernity (technology, firearms, large city living, etc.) The movie also gives proper appreciation for traditional and natural means of living like farming, swordfighting, village life, etc.

The American political right does have a tendency to treat guns like they are the 8th sacrament of the church which I think is annoying. I don't think this is a huge problem in tradition. But I do get a sense that a few people would fly off the handle if I shared my view on firearms.

Finally, I do want to say that I think it is disgusting when men are gung ho about guns and their rifleman skills but they are out of shape and probably could not even beat a 15 year old in hand to hand combat. I've seen too many fat cops patrolling around like they are the best thing since sliced bread. When the government tries to confiscate your guns and ammo, you will be worthless and unable to defend your family. This in my opinion is where guns cheapen masculinity. You are powerful but lack strength. There should not be a big disconnect between the two.