In my experience very few if any SSPX priests (that's where I go) can guide young people in matters of MJ, alcohol, self-abuse, pornography and pre-marital relations, because they have no personal experience whatsoever. …
You made this very revealing statement.
You claimed that your "
experience" (your exact word) allowed you to know the
advice of multiple priests (you used the plural) and were in a position to know
the results of that advice regarding
five concerns. So, unless 1 penitent had sins related to all five topics, you are claiming you have knowledge of the sins of
multiple penitents before and after the advice of multiple priests.
You cannot know the advice of multiple priests unless you were told by the priests and penitents or
listened at the confessional. Which is it? Did multiple priests break the seal of the confessional? Or did you listen to the confessions of others? Or did multiple people decide that they also needed to confess their sins to you? Which is it?
You cannot know the outcome of that advice unless you can compare the sins before and after the advice. To make that comparison you must have knowledge of the sɛҳuąƖ activities of multiple people. How did you get that knowledge? Did all those penitents give you a tally of their porn use, masturbation, and fornication? Were you doing occult paranormal "remote viewing"? Or were you a
serial Peeping Tom?
Of course, there is another possibility…
You lied that you have "experience," simply did the Meg thing, presumed you know the interior forum and project acts about which
you could only perversely know or imagine, and are just what we know you to be—a
rabid blowhard perverted bullsh*tter.
Your own statement reveals that you are a
seriously disordered person—sɛҳuąƖly and spiritually—who foams and
perversely ruminates about and projects the sɛҳuąƖ sins of others. It seems that your stated sɛҳuąƖ past is reflected in your present disorder.
Totally disgusting.